Comparison of Osseointegration in Novel Laser-Textured and SLA Implants.

Q2 Medicine
Ralph Zarazir, Stephanie Mrad, Georges Aoun, Alain Abi Sleiman, Marianne Mousallem, Joseph Bassil
{"title":"Comparison of Osseointegration in Novel Laser-Textured and SLA Implants.","authors":"Ralph Zarazir,&nbsp;Stephanie Mrad,&nbsp;Georges Aoun,&nbsp;Alain Abi Sleiman,&nbsp;Marianne Mousallem,&nbsp;Joseph Bassil","doi":"10.5455/aim.2023.31.137-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osseointegration is defined as the direct structural and functional connection between neo-formed bone and dental implants. Among the parameters suggested to predominantly influencing the establishment of a successful osseointegration is the quality of the implant surface, which may enhance the strength and speed of this biomechanical process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a novel laser-treated surface, compared to sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surfaces, to enhance and accelerate implant integration in delayed implant placement.<b>Methods:</b> Thirty patients with two missing posterior teeth were enrolled in this study. Each patient received, at a randomly allocated site, an implant with a conventional SLA surface, and at a second site, an implant with laser-textured surface. A total of 60 tissue-level implants were subsequently placed. Implant stability (ISQ) was measured using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). ISQ was assessed at baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1), and 12 weeks (T2) following implant placement. <b>Results:</b> There was a statistical difference in implant stability between laser-textured and SLA group at 12 weeks postoperatively. Implant stabilization showed a successful osseointegration with both surface types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both laser and SLA surface treatments had positive impacts on implant stabilization following delayed placement. Laser-treated surfaces presented higher values of osseointegration at 3 months postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f3/6e/AIM-31-137.PMC10498373.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.137-140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osseointegration is defined as the direct structural and functional connection between neo-formed bone and dental implants. Among the parameters suggested to predominantly influencing the establishment of a successful osseointegration is the quality of the implant surface, which may enhance the strength and speed of this biomechanical process.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a novel laser-treated surface, compared to sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surfaces, to enhance and accelerate implant integration in delayed implant placement.Methods: Thirty patients with two missing posterior teeth were enrolled in this study. Each patient received, at a randomly allocated site, an implant with a conventional SLA surface, and at a second site, an implant with laser-textured surface. A total of 60 tissue-level implants were subsequently placed. Implant stability (ISQ) was measured using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). ISQ was assessed at baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1), and 12 weeks (T2) following implant placement. Results: There was a statistical difference in implant stability between laser-textured and SLA group at 12 weeks postoperatively. Implant stabilization showed a successful osseointegration with both surface types.

Conclusion: Both laser and SLA surface treatments had positive impacts on implant stabilization following delayed placement. Laser-treated surfaces presented higher values of osseointegration at 3 months postoperatively.

Abstract Image

新型激光纹理种植体与SLA种植体骨整合的比较。
背景:骨整合被定义为新生骨与种植体之间的直接结构和功能连接。在影响骨整合成功建立的主要参数中,种植体表面的质量可能会提高这一生物力学过程的强度和速度。目的:本研究的目的是评估一种新型激光处理表面的能力,与喷砂、大粒度、酸蚀(SLA)表面相比,在延迟种植体放置中增强和加速种植体整合的能力。方法:选取30例2颗后牙缺失的患者作为研究对象。每位患者在随机分配的部位接受常规SLA表面的植入物,在另一个部位接受激光纹理表面的植入物。随后共放置了60个组织级植入物。采用共振频率分析(RFA)测量种植体稳定性(ISQ)。ISQ在植入后的基线(T0)、8周(T1)和12周(T2)进行评估。结果:术后12周激光织构组与SLA组种植体稳定性比较,差异有统计学意义。种植体稳定显示两种表面类型的骨结合成功。结论:激光和SLA表面处理对延迟放置种植体的稳定有积极的影响。术后3个月,激光处理的表面具有较高的骨整合值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Medica
Acta Informatica Medica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信