Clot Burden As a Predictor of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension After Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Cohort Study.

0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Esmaeil Gharepapagh, Fatemeh Rahimi, Ata Koohi, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Seyed Ali Mousavi-Aghdas, Parham Sadeghipoor, Ashraf Fakhari, Mehrad Amirnia, Reza Javadrashid, Farid Rashidi
{"title":"Clot Burden As a Predictor of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension After Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Cohort Study.","authors":"Esmaeil Gharepapagh,&nbsp;Fatemeh Rahimi,&nbsp;Ata Koohi,&nbsp;Hooman Bakhshandeh,&nbsp;Seyed Ali Mousavi-Aghdas,&nbsp;Parham Sadeghipoor,&nbsp;Ashraf Fakhari,&nbsp;Mehrad Amirnia,&nbsp;Reza Javadrashid,&nbsp;Farid Rashidi","doi":"10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.22160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A small percentage of acute pulmonary thromboembolisms (PTE) persist as chronic fibrin clots, potentially leading to chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). A scoring system for evaluating the burden of acute PTE based on computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) findings was tested for its association with CTEPH within one year.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort of 475 patients with a definitive diagnosis of acute PTE, the Qanadli score (QS) was calculated on the initial CTPA. Through regular follow-up over 1 year, symptomatic patients underwent extensive evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 475 patients enrolled in the study [age 58.3 ± 16.6, 195 (41.1%) female, QS: 13.01 ± 7.37/40], 321 patients completed the study. A total of 22 (6.8%) patients were definitively diagnosed with CTEPH. In univariate analysis, the initial QS was significantly higher in patients with subsequent CTEPH than in patients without (17 ± 5.6 vs. 13 ± 7.6, P = .009). QS was directly associated with CTEPH (odds ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.16, P = .042). The evolution of CTEPH in men could be predicted with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54% when a cut-off point of 14.5 (43.5%) was set for QS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in this setting was 0.74 with a P-value of .032. Qanadli score failed to predict CTEPH in women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scoring the clot burden in the pulmonary arteries through the Qanadli method can predict the evolution of CTEPH only in men 1 year after acute PTE. Women comprise most of the CTEPH patients. Thus, strict follow-up adherence seems to be even more important in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":"24 5","pages":"276-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/75/trp-24-5-276.PMC10544596.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.22160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A small percentage of acute pulmonary thromboembolisms (PTE) persist as chronic fibrin clots, potentially leading to chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). A scoring system for evaluating the burden of acute PTE based on computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) findings was tested for its association with CTEPH within one year.

Material and methods: In this retrospective cohort of 475 patients with a definitive diagnosis of acute PTE, the Qanadli score (QS) was calculated on the initial CTPA. Through regular follow-up over 1 year, symptomatic patients underwent extensive evaluation.

Results: Of the 475 patients enrolled in the study [age 58.3 ± 16.6, 195 (41.1%) female, QS: 13.01 ± 7.37/40], 321 patients completed the study. A total of 22 (6.8%) patients were definitively diagnosed with CTEPH. In univariate analysis, the initial QS was significantly higher in patients with subsequent CTEPH than in patients without (17 ± 5.6 vs. 13 ± 7.6, P = .009). QS was directly associated with CTEPH (odds ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.16, P = .042). The evolution of CTEPH in men could be predicted with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54% when a cut-off point of 14.5 (43.5%) was set for QS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in this setting was 0.74 with a P-value of .032. Qanadli score failed to predict CTEPH in women.

Conclusion: Scoring the clot burden in the pulmonary arteries through the Qanadli method can predict the evolution of CTEPH only in men 1 year after acute PTE. Women comprise most of the CTEPH patients. Thus, strict follow-up adherence seems to be even more important in women.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

凝块负荷作为急性肺栓塞后慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压的预测指标:一项队列研究。
目的:一小部分急性肺血栓栓塞(PTE)以慢性纤维蛋白凝块的形式持续存在,可能导致慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)。基于计算机断层扫描肺血管造影(CTPA)结果评估急性PTE负担的评分系统在一年内测试了其与CTEPH的相关性。材料和方法:在475名明确诊断为急性PTE的患者的回顾性队列中,根据最初的CTPA计算Qanadli评分(QS)。通过一年多的定期随访,对有症状的患者进行了广泛的评估。结果:在475名参与研究的患者中[年龄58.3±16.6195(41.1%)女性,QS:13.01±7.37/40],321名患者完成了研究。共有22名(6.8%)患者被明确诊断为CTEPH。在单变量分析中,有后续CTEPH的患者的初始QS显著高于没有CTEPH患者(17±5.6 vs.13±7.6,P=.009)。QS与CTEPH直接相关(优势比:1.08,95%置信区间:1.0-1.16,P=.042)。当QS的临界点为14.5(43.5%)时,男性CTEPH发展的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和54%。在该设置中,接收器工作特性曲线下的面积为0.74,P值为.032。Qanadli评分无法预测女性的CTEPH。结论:通过Qanadli方法对肺动脉血栓负荷进行评分只能预测男性急性PTE后1年CTEPH的演变。女性占大多数CTEPH患者。因此,对妇女来说,严格遵守后续行动似乎更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信