Comparison of core and process scores on the California Verbal Learning Test-3 for Parkinson's disease and essential tremor patients.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karen Torres
{"title":"Comparison of core and process scores on the California Verbal Learning Test-3 for Parkinson's disease and essential tremor patients.","authors":"Karen Torres","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2023.2241653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET) are two disorders known to lead to executive dysfunction, presumably through distinct pathways to the frontal lobes via the striatum or cerebellum, respectively. Memory functioning in PD and ET patients has been previously suggested to be adversely impacted by executive dysfunction. The aims of this exploratory study were to compare memory performance between and within groups on the California Verbal Learning Test - 3 (CVLT-3) through the analysis of core and process scores and to understand the relationship of these scores with measures of executive functioning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy PD and 54 ET patients completed comprehensive neuropsychological testing. Independent sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare between group core and process scores on the CVLT-3. Within-subjects analyses were conducted via Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test due to nonparametric data. Spearman's correlations were conducted to explore the relationship between memory process scores and measures of executive functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ET and PD samples were similar with regard to age, education, gender, and general cognitive functioning. PD patients made more repetition errors (<i>U</i> = 2391.50, <i>p</i> = .01) than ET patients and Normal Memory PD patients made more repetition errors than Low Memory PD patients (<i>U</i>= 711.00, <i>p</i>= .00). Correlational analyses revealed repetition errors were negatively associated with tests of inhibition, set shifting, and working memory (<i>r<sub>s</sub> </i>= -.293, -.232). ET patients demonstrated a preference for a serial cluster learning strategy (<i>T</i> = 861.00, <i>p</i> = .005), similar to PD patients (<i>T</i>= 1633.00, <i>p</i> = <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed presence of higher repetition errors in the PD sample that was demonstrated to have a negative relationship with measures of executive functioning. Implications for investigating process (\"qualitative\") scores in memory performance to determine extent of executive involvement are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2023.2241653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET) are two disorders known to lead to executive dysfunction, presumably through distinct pathways to the frontal lobes via the striatum or cerebellum, respectively. Memory functioning in PD and ET patients has been previously suggested to be adversely impacted by executive dysfunction. The aims of this exploratory study were to compare memory performance between and within groups on the California Verbal Learning Test - 3 (CVLT-3) through the analysis of core and process scores and to understand the relationship of these scores with measures of executive functioning.

Method: Seventy PD and 54 ET patients completed comprehensive neuropsychological testing. Independent sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare between group core and process scores on the CVLT-3. Within-subjects analyses were conducted via Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test due to nonparametric data. Spearman's correlations were conducted to explore the relationship between memory process scores and measures of executive functioning.

Results: The ET and PD samples were similar with regard to age, education, gender, and general cognitive functioning. PD patients made more repetition errors (U = 2391.50, p = .01) than ET patients and Normal Memory PD patients made more repetition errors than Low Memory PD patients (U= 711.00, p= .00). Correlational analyses revealed repetition errors were negatively associated with tests of inhibition, set shifting, and working memory (rs = -.293, -.232). ET patients demonstrated a preference for a serial cluster learning strategy (T = 861.00, p = .005), similar to PD patients (T= 1633.00, p = <.001).

Conclusions: The study revealed presence of higher repetition errors in the PD sample that was demonstrated to have a negative relationship with measures of executive functioning. Implications for investigating process ("qualitative") scores in memory performance to determine extent of executive involvement are discussed.

帕金森病患者和本质性震颤患者在加州言语学习测试-3 中的核心得分和过程得分的比较。
导言:帕金森病(PD)和本质性震颤(ET)是两种已知会导致执行功能障碍的疾病,它们可能分别通过纹状体或小脑通往额叶的不同路径。以前曾有研究表明,执行功能障碍会对帕金森病和ET患者的记忆功能产生不利影响。这项探索性研究的目的是通过分析核心和过程得分,比较组间和组内的加州言语学习测验-3(CVLT-3)记忆表现,并了解这些得分与执行功能测量的关系:70名PD和54名ET患者完成了综合神经心理学测试。采用独立样本 t 检验或曼-惠特尼检验来比较 CVLT-3 的组间核心和过程得分。由于采用的是非参数数据,因此通过 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test 进行受试者内分析。斯皮尔曼相关分析用于探讨记忆过程得分与执行功能测量之间的关系:在年龄、教育程度、性别和一般认知功能方面,ET 和 PD 样本相似。记忆障碍患者的重复错误(U=2391.50,p=.01)多于ET患者,而正常记忆障碍患者的重复错误多于低记忆障碍患者(U=711.00,p=.00)。相关分析表明,重复错误与抑制测试、集合转移和工作记忆测试呈负相关(rs = -.293, -.232)。ET患者表现出对序列群学习策略的偏好(T = 861.00,p = .005),与PD患者相似(T = 1633.00,p = 结论):研究表明,帕金森病样本中存在较高的重复错误,这与执行功能的测量结果呈负相关。本研究讨论了调查记忆表现的过程("定性")分数以确定执行参与程度的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信