The effect of rehabilitation therapies on quality of life and function in individuals with phantom limb pain after lower-limb amputation: A systematic review.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Elise Gane, Phoebe Petersen, Taylor Killalea, Paige Glavinovic, Isabel Nash, Heather Batten
{"title":"The effect of rehabilitation therapies on quality of life and function in individuals with phantom limb pain after lower-limb amputation: A systematic review.","authors":"Elise Gane, Phoebe Petersen, Taylor Killalea, Paige Glavinovic, Isabel Nash, Heather Batten","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the existing evidence surrounding the effect of rehabilitation therapies on quality of life (QOL) and function of individuals with a lower-limb amputation and experiencing phantom limb pain (PLP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. Four databases were searched with key terms that covered 4 broad areas: phantom limb, lower-limb amputation, rehabilitation interventions, and randomized controlled trial (no date limits). Outcomes of either function or QOL in people receiving rehabilitation for PLP were included. The RoB2.0 risk-of-bias tool was used to rate quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were included, reporting on QOL (n = 5) and function (n = 3), using interventions including mirror therapy, phantom exercises, and muscle relaxation. The evidence was mixed in direction and significance, and this was likely attributed to by the heterogeneity of interventions and types of outcomes as well as incomplete reporting. There was very low certainty in the effect of these rehabilitation interventions to affect QOL or function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall effect of rehabilitation interventions on QOL and function is inconclusive because of the variable results across the included randomized controlled trials. More research is needed to explore the impact of interventions beyond the outcome of pain and to establish a clearer conclusion. Including measures of QOL and function as well as pain in studies with people with PLP is encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the existing evidence surrounding the effect of rehabilitation therapies on quality of life (QOL) and function of individuals with a lower-limb amputation and experiencing phantom limb pain (PLP).

Methods: This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. Four databases were searched with key terms that covered 4 broad areas: phantom limb, lower-limb amputation, rehabilitation interventions, and randomized controlled trial (no date limits). Outcomes of either function or QOL in people receiving rehabilitation for PLP were included. The RoB2.0 risk-of-bias tool was used to rate quality.

Results: Five studies were included, reporting on QOL (n = 5) and function (n = 3), using interventions including mirror therapy, phantom exercises, and muscle relaxation. The evidence was mixed in direction and significance, and this was likely attributed to by the heterogeneity of interventions and types of outcomes as well as incomplete reporting. There was very low certainty in the effect of these rehabilitation interventions to affect QOL or function.

Conclusion: The overall effect of rehabilitation interventions on QOL and function is inconclusive because of the variable results across the included randomized controlled trials. More research is needed to explore the impact of interventions beyond the outcome of pain and to establish a clearer conclusion. Including measures of QOL and function as well as pain in studies with people with PLP is encouraged.

康复疗法对下肢截肢后幻肢痛患者的生活质量和功能的影响:系统综述。
目的:评估有关康复疗法对下肢截肢和幻肢痛患者的生活质量(QOL)和功能影响的现有证据:本综述采用系统综述和元分析首选报告项目方法。使用关键术语对四个数据库进行了检索,这些术语涵盖四大领域:幻肢、下肢截肢、康复干预和随机对照试验(无日期限制)。研究纳入了因幻肢症接受康复治疗者的功能或 QOL 结果。采用 RoB2.0 偏倚风险工具对研究质量进行评分:共纳入了五项研究,报告了 QOL(n = 5)和功能(n = 3),采用的干预措施包括镜像疗法、幻影练习和肌肉放松。证据的方向性和显著性参差不齐,这可能是由于干预措施和结果类型的异质性以及报告的不完整性造成的。这些康复干预措施对影响 QOL 或功能的效果的确定性很低:结论:由于纳入的随机对照试验结果各不相同,因此康复干预措施对患者生活质量和功能的总体影响尚无定论。需要进行更多的研究,以探讨干预措施对疼痛结果以外的影响,并得出更明确的结论。我们鼓励在对 PLP 患者进行研究时,同时纳入对 QOL 和功能以及疼痛的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信