Can Amphotericin B-mediated effects be limited using intranasal versus intravenous route?

IF 3 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic delivery Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-11 DOI:10.4155/tde-2023-0032
Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui, Timothy Yu Yee Ong, Sutherland Maciver, Naveed Ahmed Khan
{"title":"Can Amphotericin B-mediated effects be limited using intranasal versus intravenous route?","authors":"Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui,&nbsp;Timothy Yu Yee Ong,&nbsp;Sutherland Maciver,&nbsp;Naveed Ahmed Khan","doi":"10.4155/tde-2023-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> CNS infections due to parasites often prove fatal. In part, this is due to inefficacy of drugs to cross the blood-brain barrier. <b>Methods:</b> Here, we tested intranasal and intravenous route and compared adverse effects of Amphotericin B administration, through blood biochemistry, liver, kidney and brain histopathological evidence of toxicities <i>in vivo</i> post-administration. <b>Results:</b> It was observed that intranasal route limits the adverse side effects of Amphotericin B, in contrast to intravenous route. <b>Conclusion:</b> As parasites such as <i>Naegleria fowleri</i> exhibit unequivocal affinity toward the olfactory bulb and frontal lobe in the central nervous system, intranasal administration would directly reach amoebae bypassing the blood-brain barrier selectivity and achieve the minimum inhibitory concentration at the target site.</p>","PeriodicalId":22959,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic delivery","volume":"14 8","pages":"485-490"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4155/tde-2023-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: CNS infections due to parasites often prove fatal. In part, this is due to inefficacy of drugs to cross the blood-brain barrier. Methods: Here, we tested intranasal and intravenous route and compared adverse effects of Amphotericin B administration, through blood biochemistry, liver, kidney and brain histopathological evidence of toxicities in vivo post-administration. Results: It was observed that intranasal route limits the adverse side effects of Amphotericin B, in contrast to intravenous route. Conclusion: As parasites such as Naegleria fowleri exhibit unequivocal affinity toward the olfactory bulb and frontal lobe in the central nervous system, intranasal administration would directly reach amoebae bypassing the blood-brain barrier selectivity and achieve the minimum inhibitory concentration at the target site.

两性霉素B介导的作用是否可以通过鼻内和静脉途径受到限制?
目的:由寄生虫引起的中枢神经系统感染通常是致命的。这在一定程度上是由于药物无法穿过血脑屏障。方法:在这里,我们测试了鼻内和静脉给药途径,并通过血液生物化学、肝、肾和脑组织病理学证据比较了两性霉素B给药后体内毒性的不良反应。结果:与静脉注射相比,观察到鼻内途径限制了两性霉素B的不良副作用。结论:由于福氏纳氏菌等寄生虫对中枢神经系统的嗅球和额叶表现出明确的亲和力,鼻内给药将绕过血脑屏障选择性直接到达变形虫,并在靶位点达到最低的抑制浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic delivery
Therapeutic delivery PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Delivering therapeutics in a way that is right for the patient - safe, painless, reliable, targeted, efficient and cost effective - is the fundamental aim of scientists working in this area. Correspondingly, this evolving field has already yielded a diversity of delivery methods, including injectors, controlled release formulations, drug eluting implants and transdermal patches. Rapid technological advances and the desire to improve the efficacy and safety profile of existing medications by specific targeting to the site of action, combined with the drive to improve patient compliance, continue to fuel rapid research progress. Furthermore, the emergence of cell-based therapeutics and biopharmaceuticals such as proteins, peptides and nucleotides presents scientists with new and exciting challenges for the application of therapeutic delivery science and technology. Successful delivery strategies increasingly rely upon collaboration across a diversity of fields, including biology, chemistry, pharmacology, nanotechnology, physiology, materials science and engineering. Therapeutic Delivery recognizes the importance of this diverse research platform and encourages the publication of articles that reflect the highly interdisciplinary nature of the field. In a highly competitive industry, Therapeutic Delivery provides the busy researcher with a forum for the rapid publication of original research and critical reviews of all the latest relevant and significant developments, and focuses on how the technological, pharmacological, clinical and physiological aspects come together to successfully deliver modern therapeutics to patients. The journal delivers this essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats that are readily accessible to the full spectrum of therapeutic delivery researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信