The Effect of Breast Milk Odor on Feeding Cues, Transition Time to Oral Feeding, and Abdominal Perfusion in Premature Newborns: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Biological research for nursing Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1177/10998004231200784
Adalet Yücel, Sibel Küçükoğlu, Hanifi Soylu
{"title":"The Effect of Breast Milk Odor on Feeding Cues, Transition Time to Oral Feeding, and Abdominal Perfusion in Premature Newborns: A Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Adalet Yücel, Sibel Küçükoğlu, Hanifi Soylu","doi":"10.1177/10998004231200784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study was conducted to determine the effect of odor stimulation with breast milk (BM) applied to premature newborns before and during enteral feeding on feeding cues, transition time to oral feeding and abdominal perfusion.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was a parallel group pretest-post test randomised controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Türkiye. Study data were collected from 32 premature newborns between October 2020 and December 2021. Newborns were randomly assigned to either intervention (<i>n</i> = 16) or control (<i>n</i> = 16) groups. Odor stimulation with BM was applied to newborns in the intervention group (IG) before and during enteral feeding for 3 days. Data were collected with the Newborn Information Form, Abdominal Perfusion Follow-up Form, and Feeding Cues Follow-up Form. Yates corrected and Fisher chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, Cohen Kappa statistics, Permanova analysis, and Wilcoxon test were used in the analysis. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04843293).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of feeding cues in newborns who were exposed to the odor of BM, was higher than in the control group (CG) (<i>p <</i> .05). The transition times to oral feeding were similar in newborns in the IG and CG (<i>p ></i> .05). Abdominal perfusion level of newborns in the IG was higher than the CG (<i>p <</i> .05), and the level of abdominal perfusion showed a significant difference in terms of group*time interaction (<i>p <</i> .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that odor stimulation with BM will be beneficial in improving the digestive functions of premature newborns.</p>","PeriodicalId":8997,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":" ","pages":"160-175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004231200784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present study was conducted to determine the effect of odor stimulation with breast milk (BM) applied to premature newborns before and during enteral feeding on feeding cues, transition time to oral feeding and abdominal perfusion.

Design: This study was a parallel group pretest-post test randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Methods: The study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Türkiye. Study data were collected from 32 premature newborns between October 2020 and December 2021. Newborns were randomly assigned to either intervention (n = 16) or control (n = 16) groups. Odor stimulation with BM was applied to newborns in the intervention group (IG) before and during enteral feeding for 3 days. Data were collected with the Newborn Information Form, Abdominal Perfusion Follow-up Form, and Feeding Cues Follow-up Form. Yates corrected and Fisher chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, Cohen Kappa statistics, Permanova analysis, and Wilcoxon test were used in the analysis. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04843293).

Results: The frequency of feeding cues in newborns who were exposed to the odor of BM, was higher than in the control group (CG) (p < .05). The transition times to oral feeding were similar in newborns in the IG and CG (p > .05). Abdominal perfusion level of newborns in the IG was higher than the CG (p < .05), and the level of abdominal perfusion showed a significant difference in terms of group*time interaction (p < .05).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that odor stimulation with BM will be beneficial in improving the digestive functions of premature newborns.

一项随机对照试验:母乳气味对早产新生儿喂养线索、向口服喂养过渡时间和腹腔灌注的影响。
目的:探讨母乳气味刺激对早产儿肠内喂养前后的喂养提示、转口喂养时间和腹腔灌流的影响。设计:本研究为平行组前-后试验随机对照试验(RCT)。方法:研究在 rkiye新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)进行。研究数据收集于2020年10月至2021年12月期间的32名早产新生儿。新生儿被随机分为干预组(n = 16)和对照组(n = 16)。干预组(IG)新生儿在肠内喂养前和喂养期间进行气味刺激,为期3天。采用新生儿信息表、腹腔灌注随访表和喂养线索随访表收集数据。分析采用Yates校正和Fisher卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Cohen Kappa统计、Permanova分析和Wilcoxon检验。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT04843293)。结果:接触BM气味的新生儿的喂养提示频率高于对照组(CG) (p . 0.05)。IG期和CG期新生儿向口服喂养过渡的时间相似(p > 0.05)。IG组新生儿腹腔灌注水平高于CG组(p . 0.05),且组*时间交互作用差异显著(p . 0.05)。结论:BM气味刺激有助于改善早产儿的消化功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Research For Nursing (BRN) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that helps nurse researchers, educators, and practitioners integrate information from many basic disciplines; biology, physiology, chemistry, health policy, business, engineering, education, communication and the social sciences into nursing research, theory and clinical practice. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信