Ryan M Hill, Paige Picou, Zain Hussain, Blake A Vieyra, Kaylee M Perkins
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training Program.","authors":"Ryan M Hill, Paige Picou, Zain Hussain, Blake A Vieyra, Kaylee M Perkins","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Suicide prevention gatekeeper training programs offer a unique opportunity to increase knowledge about suicide prevention, enhance risk identification, and reduce suicide-related stigma. <i>Aims:</i> This study evaluated the efficacy of an online suicide prevention gatekeeper training program in a randomized trial. <i>Method:</i> Participants were US college students (<i>N</i> = 388). Participants (69.3% women) had a mean age of 19.01 years and identified primarily as Hispanic/Latinx (52.1%) and non-Hispanic White (22.4%). Participants completed pre- and posttest surveys and were randomly assigned to either the ASK About Suicide to Save a Life (AS + K?) suicide prevention gatekeeper training program or an information-only comparison intervention. <i>Results:</i> Participants in the AS + K? condition reported significantly greater gatekeeper preparedness and self-efficacy, and lower stigmatized attitudes at posttraining, as compared with those in the comparison condition. There were no significant differences in likelihood of using gatekeeper skills or suicide-related knowledge across groups. <i>Limitations:</i> This short-term study was not able to assess behavioral change resulting in use of gatekeeper skills over time. <i>Conclusions:</i> Completion of gatekeeper training resulted in increases in preparedness and self-efficacy for engaging in gatekeeper behaviors, as well as a reduction in suicide-related stigma. Despite small intervention effects, the online AS + K? training appears to be a promising program.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Suicide prevention gatekeeper training programs offer a unique opportunity to increase knowledge about suicide prevention, enhance risk identification, and reduce suicide-related stigma. Aims: This study evaluated the efficacy of an online suicide prevention gatekeeper training program in a randomized trial. Method: Participants were US college students (N = 388). Participants (69.3% women) had a mean age of 19.01 years and identified primarily as Hispanic/Latinx (52.1%) and non-Hispanic White (22.4%). Participants completed pre- and posttest surveys and were randomly assigned to either the ASK About Suicide to Save a Life (AS + K?) suicide prevention gatekeeper training program or an information-only comparison intervention. Results: Participants in the AS + K? condition reported significantly greater gatekeeper preparedness and self-efficacy, and lower stigmatized attitudes at posttraining, as compared with those in the comparison condition. There were no significant differences in likelihood of using gatekeeper skills or suicide-related knowledge across groups. Limitations: This short-term study was not able to assess behavioral change resulting in use of gatekeeper skills over time. Conclusions: Completion of gatekeeper training resulted in increases in preparedness and self-efficacy for engaging in gatekeeper behaviors, as well as a reduction in suicide-related stigma. Despite small intervention effects, the online AS + K? training appears to be a promising program.
背景:自杀预防把关人培训项目为增加自杀预防知识、提高风险识别能力和减少自杀相关污名化提供了一个独特的机会。目的:本研究通过随机试验评估了在线自杀预防守门人培训项目的效果。方法:参与者为美国大学生(N:参与者为美国大学生(N = 388)。参与者(69.3% 为女性)的平均年龄为 19.01 岁,主要身份为西班牙裔/拉丁裔(52.1%)和非西班牙裔白人(22.4%)。参与者完成了测试前和测试后的调查,并被随机分配到 "ASK About Suicide to Save a Life"(AS + K?)自杀预防守门人培训项目或仅提供信息的对比干预项目中。结果:与对照组相比,AS + K?条件下的参与者在培训后的守门人准备程度和自我效能感明显提高,污名化态度明显降低。各组在使用守门人技能或自杀相关知识的可能性方面没有明显差异。局限性:这项短期研究无法评估随着时间的推移使用把关人技能的行为变化。结论:完成守门人培训后,参与守门人行为的准备程度和自我效能都有所提高,与自杀相关的耻辱感也有所减少。尽管干预效果较小,但在线 AS + K? 培训似乎是一个很有前景的项目。
期刊介绍:
A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.