Improving Resident Hospital Discharge Communication by Changing Electronic Health Record Templates to Enhance Primary Care Provider Satisfaction.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Quality Management in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1097/QMH.0000000000000417
Kimberly A Lynch, Sarah W Baron, Sharon Rikin, Julie Kanevsky, Carol B Kelly, Gianni Carrozzi, Ginger Wey, Karen Yang
{"title":"Improving Resident Hospital Discharge Communication by Changing Electronic Health Record Templates to Enhance Primary Care Provider Satisfaction.","authors":"Kimberly A Lynch, Sarah W Baron, Sharon Rikin, Julie Kanevsky, Carol B Kelly, Gianni Carrozzi, Ginger Wey, Karen Yang","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Despite use of standardized electronic health record templates, the structure of discharge summaries may hinder communication from inpatient settings to primary care providers (PCPs). We developed an enhanced electronic discharge summary template to improve PCP satisfaction with written discharge summaries targeting diagnoses, medication reconciliation, laboratory test results, specialist follow-up, and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Resident template usage was measured using statistical process control charts. PCP reviewers' discharge summary satisfaction was surveyed using 5-point Likert scales analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Residents were surveyed for satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Resident template usage increased from 61% initially to 72% of discharge summaries at 6 months. The PCP reviewers reported increased satisfaction for summaries using the template compared with those without (4.3 vs 3.9, P = .003). Surveyed residents desired template inclusion in the default electronic discharge summary (93%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This system-level resident-initiated quality improvement initiative created a novel discharge summary template that achieved widespread usage among residents and significantly increased outpatient PCP satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Despite use of standardized electronic health record templates, the structure of discharge summaries may hinder communication from inpatient settings to primary care providers (PCPs). We developed an enhanced electronic discharge summary template to improve PCP satisfaction with written discharge summaries targeting diagnoses, medication reconciliation, laboratory test results, specialist follow-up, and recommendations.

Methods: Resident template usage was measured using statistical process control charts. PCP reviewers' discharge summary satisfaction was surveyed using 5-point Likert scales analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Residents were surveyed for satisfaction.

Results: Resident template usage increased from 61% initially to 72% of discharge summaries at 6 months. The PCP reviewers reported increased satisfaction for summaries using the template compared with those without (4.3 vs 3.9, P = .003). Surveyed residents desired template inclusion in the default electronic discharge summary (93%).

Conclusions: This system-level resident-initiated quality improvement initiative created a novel discharge summary template that achieved widespread usage among residents and significantly increased outpatient PCP satisfaction.

通过更改电子健康记录模板改善住院病人出院沟通,提高初级保健提供者的满意度。
背景和目的:尽管使用了标准化的电子健康记录模板,但出院摘要的结构可能会阻碍住院患者与初级保健提供者(PCP)之间的沟通。我们开发了一种增强型电子出院摘要模板,以提高初级保健医生对书面出院摘要的满意度,这些出院摘要主要针对诊断、药物调节、实验室检查结果、专家随访和建议:方法:使用统计过程控制图测量住院医生模板的使用情况。使用 5 点李克特量表调查初级保健医生审阅者对出院摘要的满意度,并使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行分析。对住院医生进行满意度调查:结果:住院医生模板使用率从最初的 61% 提高到 6 个月后的 72%。初级保健医生审阅者对使用模板与未使用模板的出院摘要的满意度均有所提高(4.3 vs 3.9,P = .003)。接受调查的住院医师希望将模板纳入默认的电子出院摘要中(93%):这项由住院医师发起的系统级质量改进计划创建了一个新颖的出院摘要模板,该模板在住院医师中得到广泛使用,并显著提高了门诊初级保健医生的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信