Non-identified and directed embryo donation: a questionnaire study on donor and recipient perspectives.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human Fertility Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2023.2238898
Noga Fuchs Weizman, Samantha Yee, Anya Kazay, Evening K'Necht, Anushka A Kuwar, Gillian M Maltz, Clifford L Librach
{"title":"Non-identified and directed embryo donation: a questionnaire study on donor and recipient perspectives.","authors":"Noga Fuchs Weizman, Samantha Yee, Anya Kazay, Evening K'Necht, Anushka A Kuwar, Gillian M Maltz, Clifford L Librach","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2023.2238898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the growing challenge of abandoned surplus embryos in the ART arena, and the limited traction of embryo donation as a viable embryo disposition choice, it is important to better understand barriers to wider adoption of this opportunity. We aim to learn about perspectives and experience of participants in directed and non-identified embryo donation programmes. This was a longitudinal cohort survey study, of all participants in an embryo donation programme in a single university affiliated clinic between 2016 and 2020. Clinical data were extracted from counselling reports. Based on these data, non-identified online questionnaires were constructed and refined via Delphi procedure for face and content validity. Sixty-five online questionnaires were emailed between March-April 2021. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation, Fisher's exact test and t-test were used for analyses. Source of patient awareness, factors influencing the decision-making process, patient perspective and satisfaction were explored. The response rate was 67.2%. Most participants in the non-identified programme learned of it through their treating physicians, whereas most participants in the directed programme learned of it online. The main driver to donate across both cohorts was wanting to give others the opportunity to experience the joy of parenthood. Overall, 45% described moderate to marked difficulty in decision making related to donating their embryos, and this did not differ between cohorts. Non-identified donors reported feeling highly attached to the donated embryos more often than directed donors. Level of satisfaction was higher in the directed donation programme. Participants were more satisfied following directed than non-identified donation, and some even consider their counterparts as extended family. Our findings should be validated in various settings, and on larger samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":" ","pages":"1417-1428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2023.2238898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the growing challenge of abandoned surplus embryos in the ART arena, and the limited traction of embryo donation as a viable embryo disposition choice, it is important to better understand barriers to wider adoption of this opportunity. We aim to learn about perspectives and experience of participants in directed and non-identified embryo donation programmes. This was a longitudinal cohort survey study, of all participants in an embryo donation programme in a single university affiliated clinic between 2016 and 2020. Clinical data were extracted from counselling reports. Based on these data, non-identified online questionnaires were constructed and refined via Delphi procedure for face and content validity. Sixty-five online questionnaires were emailed between March-April 2021. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation, Fisher's exact test and t-test were used for analyses. Source of patient awareness, factors influencing the decision-making process, patient perspective and satisfaction were explored. The response rate was 67.2%. Most participants in the non-identified programme learned of it through their treating physicians, whereas most participants in the directed programme learned of it online. The main driver to donate across both cohorts was wanting to give others the opportunity to experience the joy of parenthood. Overall, 45% described moderate to marked difficulty in decision making related to donating their embryos, and this did not differ between cohorts. Non-identified donors reported feeling highly attached to the donated embryos more often than directed donors. Level of satisfaction was higher in the directed donation programme. Participants were more satisfied following directed than non-identified donation, and some even consider their counterparts as extended family. Our findings should be validated in various settings, and on larger samples.

非识别和定向胚胎捐赠:关于捐赠者和受赠者观点的问卷调查研究。
在人工生殖技术领域,被遗弃的多余胚胎所带来的挑战越来越大,而胚胎捐献作为一种可行的胚胎处置选择,其影响力有限,因此,更好地了解阻碍更广泛地利用这一机会的障碍非常重要。我们旨在了解定向和非定向胚胎捐赠计划参与者的观点和经验。这是一项纵向队列调查研究,调查对象是 2016 年至 2020 年间在一所大学附属诊所参加胚胎捐献计划的所有参与者。临床数据从咨询报告中提取。在这些数据的基础上,构建了非识别在线问卷,并通过德尔菲程序对问卷的面效度和内容效度进行了改进。在 2021 年 3 月至 4 月期间,通过电子邮件发送了 65 份在线问卷。分析采用了描述性统计、交叉表、费雪精确检验和 t 检验。调查内容包括患者的认知来源、影响决策过程的因素、患者的观点和满意度。回复率为 67.2%。大多数未确定计划的参与者是通过主治医生了解到该计划的,而大多数定向计划的参与者是通过网络了解到该计划的。两组参与者捐赠的主要动机都是希望让其他人有机会体验为人父母的喜悦。总体而言,45% 的人在做出捐献胚胎的决定时遇到了中度到明显的困难,这一点在不同组群之间没有差异。与定向捐献者相比,未指定身份的捐献者更常表示对捐献的胚胎感情深厚。定向捐献计划的满意度更高。定向捐献者比非识别捐献者更满意,有些人甚至把他们的同伴视为大家庭。我们的研究结果应在不同环境和更大样本中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信