Multidisciplinary Approach to Sedation and Early Mobility of Intubated Critically Ill Neurologic Patients Improves Mobility at Discharge.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurohospitalist Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1177/19418744231182897
Megan E Barra, Christine Iracheta, Joseph Tolland, Johnathan Jehle, Ljubica Minova, Karen Li, Mary Amatangelo, Patricia Krause, Ayush Batra, Henrikas Vaitkevicius
{"title":"Multidisciplinary Approach to Sedation and Early Mobility of Intubated Critically Ill Neurologic Patients Improves Mobility at Discharge.","authors":"Megan E Barra, Christine Iracheta, Joseph Tolland, Johnathan Jehle, Ljubica Minova, Karen Li, Mary Amatangelo, Patricia Krause, Ayush Batra, Henrikas Vaitkevicius","doi":"10.1177/19418744231182897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Over-sedation may confound neurologic assessment in critically ill neurologic patients and prolong duration of mechanical ventilation (MV). Decreased sedative use may facilitate early functional independence when combined with early mobility. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a stepwise, multidisciplinary analgesia-first sedation pathway and early mobility protocol on medication use and mobility in the neuroscience intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center prospective cohort study with adult patients admitted to a neuroscience ICU between March and June 2016-2018 who required MV for greater than 48 hours. Patients were included from three separate phases of the study: Phase I - historical controls (2016); Phase II - analgesia-first pathway (2017); Phase III - early mobility protocol (2018). Primary outcomes included propofol requirements during MV, total rehabilitation therapy provided, and functional mobility during ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>156 patients were included in the analysis. Decreasing propofol exposure was observed during Phase I, II, and III (median 2243.7 mg/day vs 2065.6 mg/day vs 1360.8 mg/day, respectively; P = .04 between Phase I and III). Early mobility was provided in 59.7%, 40%, and 81.6% of patients while admitted to the ICU in Phase I, II, and III, respectively (P < .01). An increased proportion of patients in Phase III were walking or ambulating at ICU discharge (26.7%; 8/30) compared to Phase I (7.9%, 3/38, P = .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An interdisciplinary approach with an analgesia-first sedation pathway with early mobility protocol was associated with less sedative use, increased rehabilitation therapy, and improved functional mobility status at ICU discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744231182897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Over-sedation may confound neurologic assessment in critically ill neurologic patients and prolong duration of mechanical ventilation (MV). Decreased sedative use may facilitate early functional independence when combined with early mobility. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a stepwise, multidisciplinary analgesia-first sedation pathway and early mobility protocol on medication use and mobility in the neuroscience intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: We performed a single-center prospective cohort study with adult patients admitted to a neuroscience ICU between March and June 2016-2018 who required MV for greater than 48 hours. Patients were included from three separate phases of the study: Phase I - historical controls (2016); Phase II - analgesia-first pathway (2017); Phase III - early mobility protocol (2018). Primary outcomes included propofol requirements during MV, total rehabilitation therapy provided, and functional mobility during ICU admission.

Results: 156 patients were included in the analysis. Decreasing propofol exposure was observed during Phase I, II, and III (median 2243.7 mg/day vs 2065.6 mg/day vs 1360.8 mg/day, respectively; P = .04 between Phase I and III). Early mobility was provided in 59.7%, 40%, and 81.6% of patients while admitted to the ICU in Phase I, II, and III, respectively (P < .01). An increased proportion of patients in Phase III were walking or ambulating at ICU discharge (26.7%; 8/30) compared to Phase I (7.9%, 3/38, P = .05).

Conclusions: An interdisciplinary approach with an analgesia-first sedation pathway with early mobility protocol was associated with less sedative use, increased rehabilitation therapy, and improved functional mobility status at ICU discharge.

插管危重神经系统患者镇静和早期活动的多学科方法改善出院时的活动能力。
背景和目的:过度镇静可能会混淆危重神经系统患者的神经系统评估,并延长机械通气(MV)的持续时间。减少镇静剂的使用可能有助于早期的功能独立性,与早期的行动能力相结合。本研究的目的是评估逐步,神经科学重症监护室(ICU)药物使用和活动的多学科镇痛第一镇静途径和早期活动方案。方法:我们对2016-2018年3月至6月入住神经科学ICU的需要MV超过48小时的成年患者进行了一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。患者来自研究的三个独立阶段:第一阶段-历史对照(2016);第二阶段-镇痛第一途径(2017);第三阶段-早期移动协议(2018)。主要结果包括MV期间的丙泊酚需求、提供的全面康复治疗以及ICU入院期间的功能活动。结果:156例患者被纳入分析。在I、II和III期观察到丙泊酚暴露量减少(中位数分别为2243.7 mg/天、2065.6 mg/天和1360.8 mg/天;I期和III期之间P=0.04)。在I、II和III期入住ICU的患者中,59.7%、40%和81.6%的患者提供了早期活动能力,与I期(7.9%,3/38,P=0.05)相比,III期患者出院时行走或走动的比例增加(26.7%;8/30),以及改善ICU出院时的功能活动状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信