Elective Single Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfer in IVF Patients with Suboptimal Ovarian Response is Not Detrimental to Cumulative Pregnancy and Reduces Multiple Pregnancy Rates.

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alessio Paffoni, Sabrina Cesana, Laura Corti, Hilda Wyssling, Alessandro Kunderfranco, Marco Claudio Bianchi
{"title":"Elective Single Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfer in IVF Patients with Suboptimal Ovarian Response is Not Detrimental to Cumulative Pregnancy and Reduces Multiple Pregnancy Rates.","authors":"Alessio Paffoni, Sabrina Cesana, Laura Corti, Hilda Wyssling, Alessandro Kunderfranco, Marco Claudio Bianchi","doi":"10.1007/s13224-023-01768-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether elective single embryo transfer in patients with suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation is detrimental to pregnancy rates compared to double embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control retrospective study was performed in a cohort of couples undergoing IVF at the Infertility Unit of the ASST Lariana with ≤ 9 oocytes and at least 2 viable embryos. A total of 424 women were analyzed in the \"double embryo transfer\" group (<i>n</i> = 212) and elective \"single embryo transfer\" group (<i>n</i> = 212); they were matched 1:1 for female age, ovarian reserve and number of previous cycles. Cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval was the main outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative pregnancy rate per cycle, including the fresh embryo and subsequent frozen embryo transfers, was 26% and 26%, respectively. Considering the main confounding factors, a binomial logistic model indicated that the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate was not significantly affected when a single embryo transfer was performed in women recovering up to nine oocytes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Live birth rate was similar between the two groups, while twin pregnancies were significantly reduced in women receiving single embryo transfer suggesting that elective single embryo transfer in patients with a limited number of embryos is not detrimental to pregnancy rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"73 4","pages":"329-335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-023-01768-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether elective single embryo transfer in patients with suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation is detrimental to pregnancy rates compared to double embryo transfer.

Methods: A case-control retrospective study was performed in a cohort of couples undergoing IVF at the Infertility Unit of the ASST Lariana with ≤ 9 oocytes and at least 2 viable embryos. A total of 424 women were analyzed in the "double embryo transfer" group (n = 212) and elective "single embryo transfer" group (n = 212); they were matched 1:1 for female age, ovarian reserve and number of previous cycles. Cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval was the main outcome.

Results: The cumulative pregnancy rate per cycle, including the fresh embryo and subsequent frozen embryo transfers, was 26% and 26%, respectively. Considering the main confounding factors, a binomial logistic model indicated that the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate was not significantly affected when a single embryo transfer was performed in women recovering up to nine oocytes.

Conclusion: Live birth rate was similar between the two groups, while twin pregnancies were significantly reduced in women receiving single embryo transfer suggesting that elective single embryo transfer in patients with a limited number of embryos is not detrimental to pregnancy rates.

对卵巢反应不佳的试管婴儿患者进行选择性单裂期胚胎移植不会影响累积妊娠率并降低多胎妊娠率。
目的:与双胚胎移植相比,评估对卵巢刺激反应不理想的患者选择单胚胎移植是否不利于妊娠率:一项病例对照回顾性研究的对象是在拉里亚纳不孕症中心接受体外受精的夫妇群,这些夫妇的卵母细胞数不超过9个,且至少有2个可存活的胚胎。共对 424 名妇女进行了分析,分为 "双胚胎移植 "组(n = 212)和选择性 "单胚胎移植 "组(n = 212);这两组妇女的年龄、卵巢储备和前几个周期的次数均为 1:1。主要结果是每次取卵的累积临床妊娠率:每个周期的累积妊娠率(包括新鲜胚胎移植和随后的冷冻胚胎移植)分别为 26% 和 26%。考虑到主要的混杂因素,二项Logistic模型显示,对于最多取回9个卵母细胞的妇女来说,如果进行单次胚胎移植,累积临床妊娠率不会受到显著影响:结论:两组患者的活产率相似,而接受单胚胎移植的女性双胎妊娠率明显降低,这表明对胚胎数量有限的患者进行选择性单胚胎移植不会对妊娠率产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信