Pseudo-outbreak of haemodiafiltration dialysis fluid contamination: results of a detailed epidemiologic investigation

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Renée Lévesque , Patrice Savard , Bernard Canaud
{"title":"Pseudo-outbreak of haemodiafiltration dialysis fluid contamination: results of a detailed epidemiologic investigation","authors":"Renée Lévesque ,&nbsp;Patrice Savard ,&nbsp;Bernard Canaud","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Compliance with dialysis fluid ultrapurity standards is a paramount for online modalities. More than 200 dialysis fluid samples have been analyzed monthly for years in our two dialysis units, with compliant microbiological results until mid-2020.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>In mid-2020, an unusual occurrence (30%) of contaminated dialysis fluids in dialysis units led us to investigate to determine the source.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Microbiological methods for aquaphilic bacteria culturing and endotoxin detection in dialysis fluids were routinely performed on a monthly basis for all dialysis machines. As the contamination appeared randomly and almost simultaneously in our two units without any routine change or febrile syndrome, we searched for a common cause. Supplier's sampling kits as well as microbiological laboratory procedures were scrupulously investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>21 out of 30 sampling bags filled with sterile water brought back numerous fungi and bacteria. Laboratory's investigation, through the negative control tests performed routinely, exonerated the lab. All batches of bags analyzed later showed variable levels of contamination according to their transport/storage mode or date of manufacturing. Analyses performed by the supplier – methods complying with the medical device's standards but different from those recommended for dialysis fluids purity – remained negative.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our investigation revealed that the contamination of our sampling kits came presumably from the manufacturer's supplying chain. Such false-positive results findings, created serious safety issues and disturbed clinical activities since positive machines were quarantined. Furthermore, it raised a serious concern about manufacturing, microbiological checking and shipping methods for the medical device industry that deserve further attention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/eb/main.PMC10485658.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Compliance with dialysis fluid ultrapurity standards is a paramount for online modalities. More than 200 dialysis fluid samples have been analyzed monthly for years in our two dialysis units, with compliant microbiological results until mid-2020.

Aim

In mid-2020, an unusual occurrence (30%) of contaminated dialysis fluids in dialysis units led us to investigate to determine the source.

Methods

Microbiological methods for aquaphilic bacteria culturing and endotoxin detection in dialysis fluids were routinely performed on a monthly basis for all dialysis machines. As the contamination appeared randomly and almost simultaneously in our two units without any routine change or febrile syndrome, we searched for a common cause. Supplier's sampling kits as well as microbiological laboratory procedures were scrupulously investigated.

Findings

21 out of 30 sampling bags filled with sterile water brought back numerous fungi and bacteria. Laboratory's investigation, through the negative control tests performed routinely, exonerated the lab. All batches of bags analyzed later showed variable levels of contamination according to their transport/storage mode or date of manufacturing. Analyses performed by the supplier – methods complying with the medical device's standards but different from those recommended for dialysis fluids purity – remained negative.

Conclusion

Our investigation revealed that the contamination of our sampling kits came presumably from the manufacturer's supplying chain. Such false-positive results findings, created serious safety issues and disturbed clinical activities since positive machines were quarantined. Furthermore, it raised a serious concern about manufacturing, microbiological checking and shipping methods for the medical device industry that deserve further attention.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

假性爆发血液滤过透析液污染:详细的流行病学调查结果
符合透析液超纯度标准是在线模式的重中之重。多年来,我们的两个透析单元每月分析200多个透析液样本,直到2020年中期,微生物学结果都符合要求。在2020年中期,透析单位中不寻常地出现了受污染的透析液(30%),这促使我们进行调查以确定来源。方法采用微生物学方法对所有透析机透析液进行亲水细菌培养和内毒素检测,每月例行一次。由于污染随机出现,几乎同时出现在我们的两个单位,没有任何常规变化或发热综合征,我们寻找一个共同的原因。供应商的取样包和微生物实验室程序都经过严格调查。在30个装满无菌水的取样袋中,有21个带回了大量的真菌和细菌。实验室的调查,通过常规的阴性对照试验,证明了实验室的清白。随后分析的所有批次的袋子都显示出不同程度的污染,这取决于它们的运输/储存方式或制造日期。供应商进行的分析——方法符合医疗设备的标准,但与透析液纯度的推荐方法不同——仍为阴性。结论我们的调查显示,我们的抽样试剂盒的污染可能来自制造商的供应链。这种假阳性结果的发现造成了严重的安全问题,并扰乱了临床活动,因为阳性机器被隔离了。此外,它对医疗器械行业的制造、微生物检查和运输方法提出了严重关切,值得进一步关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信