A comparison of visual discomfort experienced by surgeons in wireless versus conventional endoscopy in laparoscopic surgery.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hanjiang Xu, Di Niu, Cheng Yang, Zongyao Hao, Chaozhao Liang
{"title":"A comparison of visual discomfort experienced by surgeons in wireless versus conventional endoscopy in laparoscopic surgery.","authors":"Hanjiang Xu,&nbsp;Di Niu,&nbsp;Cheng Yang,&nbsp;Zongyao Hao,&nbsp;Chaozhao Liang","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was performed to introduce a new wireless endoscopic system. Research and development were based on fifth-generation transmission technology. Eye symptoms and visual discomfort induced by the novel endoscopic system were compared with those induced by the conventional endoscopic system before and during laparoscopic pelvic surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty surgeons successfully conducted laparoscopic pelvic surgeries using a conventional endoscopic system and a wireless endoscopic system. Subjective and objective data were measured to evaluate visual discomfort before and 2 hours after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the conventional endoscopic and wireless endoscopic system groups, no significant differences were found in the presurgical or postsurgical questionnaires. In both groups, tear film breakup times significantly decreased after surgery. However, after comparing the 2 groups, no statistically significant difference was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the conventional endoscopic system, the novel wireless endoscopic system does not cause additional visual discomfort for experienced surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":"17 2","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ef/21/curr-urol-17-077.PMC10489356.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was performed to introduce a new wireless endoscopic system. Research and development were based on fifth-generation transmission technology. Eye symptoms and visual discomfort induced by the novel endoscopic system were compared with those induced by the conventional endoscopic system before and during laparoscopic pelvic surgery.

Materials and methods: Twenty surgeons successfully conducted laparoscopic pelvic surgeries using a conventional endoscopic system and a wireless endoscopic system. Subjective and objective data were measured to evaluate visual discomfort before and 2 hours after surgery.

Results: In the conventional endoscopic and wireless endoscopic system groups, no significant differences were found in the presurgical or postsurgical questionnaires. In both groups, tear film breakup times significantly decreased after surgery. However, after comparing the 2 groups, no statistically significant difference was found.

Conclusions: Compared with the conventional endoscopic system, the novel wireless endoscopic system does not cause additional visual discomfort for experienced surgeons.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腹腔镜手术中无线内镜与传统内镜下外科医生视觉不适的比较。
背景:本研究旨在介绍一种新的无线内镜系统。研发是基于第五代传输技术。比较腹腔镜盆腔手术前和手术中,新型内镜系统与传统内镜系统引起的眼部症状和视觉不适。材料和方法:20名外科医生成功地使用常规内镜系统和无线内镜系统进行了腹腔镜盆腔手术。测量主观和客观数据,评估术前和术后2小时的视觉不适。结果:常规内镜组与无线内镜组术前、术后问卷调查差异无统计学意义。两组患者术后泪膜破裂次数均显著减少。但两组比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:与传统内镜系统相比,新型无线内镜系统不会给有经验的外科医生带来额外的视觉不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Urology
Current Urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信