Effectiveness of Lactational Amenorrhea Method in Ethiopia: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tadesse Gure Eticha, Sagni Girma, Galana Mamo, Fekede Asefa, Abdi Birhanu, Bedasa Taye, Addisu Alemu, Kabtamu Nigussie, Abel Gedefaw, Tinsae Genet, Demisew Amenu, Thomas Mekuria, Abera Kenay Tura
{"title":"Effectiveness of Lactational Amenorrhea Method in Ethiopia: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Tadesse Gure Eticha,&nbsp;Sagni Girma,&nbsp;Galana Mamo,&nbsp;Fekede Asefa,&nbsp;Abdi Birhanu,&nbsp;Bedasa Taye,&nbsp;Addisu Alemu,&nbsp;Kabtamu Nigussie,&nbsp;Abel Gedefaw,&nbsp;Tinsae Genet,&nbsp;Demisew Amenu,&nbsp;Thomas Mekuria,&nbsp;Abera Kenay Tura","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S425574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) is one of the most commonly used contraception methods during the first six months of a woman's postpartum period, there has been little research on its effectiveness in general and particularly in Ethiopia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of LAM and the experiences of Ethiopian women who used it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multi-center prospective cohort study of postpartum women from five Ethiopian regions and one city administration. All pregnant women who gave birth in these randomly selected hospitals and five health centers directly referring to the hospitals were invited to the study if they selected LAM and were followed monthly at home. Each month, trained researchers visited the woman at her home and collected information about breast feeding, the return of menses, the resumption of sex, the use of another contraceptive, and a pregnancy test using urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Women who reported starting new contraceptive methods, resumption of menses, starting complementary feeding, neonatal death, getting pregnant, or refusing were excluded from the cohort. The data were collected using ODK Collect and exported to Stata 14 for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2162 women who selected LAM as a contraceptive, 2022 were enrolled in the cohort study, and 901 completed the follow-up. At the end of the sixth month, eight women got pregnant, corresponding to an effectiveness of 99.1%. More than half of the cohort were excluded from the follow-up for reasons of transitioning to other types of contraception, resumption of menses, or refusal to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effectiveness of LAM is high and should be recommended for postpartum women, with proper counseling provided. A study should be conducted to examine the effectiveness of breast feeding as a contraceptive beyond the Bellagio consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/29/oajc-14-149.PMC10488729.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S425574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) is one of the most commonly used contraception methods during the first six months of a woman's postpartum period, there has been little research on its effectiveness in general and particularly in Ethiopia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of LAM and the experiences of Ethiopian women who used it.

Methods: This was a multi-center prospective cohort study of postpartum women from five Ethiopian regions and one city administration. All pregnant women who gave birth in these randomly selected hospitals and five health centers directly referring to the hospitals were invited to the study if they selected LAM and were followed monthly at home. Each month, trained researchers visited the woman at her home and collected information about breast feeding, the return of menses, the resumption of sex, the use of another contraceptive, and a pregnancy test using urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Women who reported starting new contraceptive methods, resumption of menses, starting complementary feeding, neonatal death, getting pregnant, or refusing were excluded from the cohort. The data were collected using ODK Collect and exported to Stata 14 for analysis.

Results: Among the 2162 women who selected LAM as a contraceptive, 2022 were enrolled in the cohort study, and 901 completed the follow-up. At the end of the sixth month, eight women got pregnant, corresponding to an effectiveness of 99.1%. More than half of the cohort were excluded from the follow-up for reasons of transitioning to other types of contraception, resumption of menses, or refusal to follow-up.

Conclusion: The effectiveness of LAM is high and should be recommended for postpartum women, with proper counseling provided. A study should be conducted to examine the effectiveness of breast feeding as a contraceptive beyond the Bellagio consensus.

Abstract Image

埃塞俄比亚哺乳期闭经法的有效性:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
背景:虽然哺乳期闭经法(LAM)是妇女产后前六个月最常用的避孕方法之一,但对其有效性的研究很少,特别是在埃塞俄比亚。本研究的目的是评估LAM的有效性和使用它的埃塞俄比亚妇女的经验。方法:这是一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,来自埃塞俄比亚五个地区和一个城市管理部门的产后妇女。所有在这些随机选择的医院和五家直接涉及医院的保健中心分娩的孕妇都被邀请参加研究,如果她们选择了LAM,并每月在家中进行随访。每个月,训练有素的研究人员到该妇女的家中,收集有关母乳喂养、月经恢复、性生活恢复、使用其他避孕药具以及使用尿液人类绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)进行妊娠试验的信息。报告开始使用新的避孕方法、恢复月经、开始补充喂养、新生儿死亡、怀孕或拒绝的妇女被排除在队列之外。使用ODK Collect收集数据,并导出到Stata 14进行分析。结果:在2162名选择LAM作为避孕药的女性中,有2022名纳入队列研究,901名完成随访。在第六个月结束时,有8名妇女怀孕,对应的有效性为99.1%。超过一半的队列由于过渡到其他避孕方式、月经恢复或拒绝随访的原因被排除在随访之外。结论:LAM疗效高,应推荐用于产后妇女,并给予适当的咨询。应该进行一项研究,以检验母乳喂养作为一种避孕措施的有效性,而不是贝拉吉奥共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信