Perceptions of medical students toward assessors in interprofessional education.

Korean journal of medical education Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.3946/kjme.2023.268

Kyung Hye Park

{"title":"Perceptions of medical students toward assessors in interprofessional education.","authors":"Kyung Hye Park","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2023.268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aims to establish if medical students think it is fair to be assessed by nursing professors in interprofessional education (IPE) and why.Methods: Eighty-seven third-year medical students who participated in the IPE in 2022 submitted self-reflection essays. They were asked how they perceived the assessors, and 86 medical students responded to content analyses.Results: Sixty-seven students (77.9%) agreed to be assessed by nursing professors. They believed that interprofessional assessment is possible because it is an IPE. They also believed that this was an opportunity to be assessed from various perspectives. Nineteen students (22.1%) objected because the assessment criteria may be different and nursing professors would not understand the learning experiences of medical students.Conclusion: Regarding the reasons medical students oppose it, IPE developers should supplement the development of assessment criteria and understand learners' experiences during planning assessment.","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"35 3","pages":"297-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/09/kjme-2023-268.PMC10493405.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2023.268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to establish if medical students think it is fair to be assessed by nursing professors in interprofessional education (IPE) and why.

Methods: Eighty-seven third-year medical students who participated in the IPE in 2022 submitted self-reflection essays. They were asked how they perceived the assessors, and 86 medical students responded to content analyses.

Results: Sixty-seven students (77.9%) agreed to be assessed by nursing professors. They believed that interprofessional assessment is possible because it is an IPE. They also believed that this was an opportunity to be assessed from various perspectives. Nineteen students (22.1%) objected because the assessment criteria may be different and nursing professors would not understand the learning experiences of medical students.

Conclusion: Regarding the reasons medical students oppose it, IPE developers should supplement the development of assessment criteria and understand learners' experiences during planning assessment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

医学生对跨专业教育评核员的看法。

目的:本研究旨在探讨医学生是否认为在跨专业教育(IPE)中被护理教授评估是公平的及其原因。方法:87名参与2022年国际医学研究中心的医三学生提交自我反思论文。他们被问及如何看待评估员，86名医学生对内容分析做出了回应。结果:67名学生(77.9%)同意接受护理教授的评估。他们认为，跨专业评估是可能的，因为它是一个IPE。他们还认为，这是一个从不同角度进行评估的机会。19名学生(22.1%)反对，理由是评估标准可能不同，护理教授不了解医学生的学习经历。结论:针对医学生反对的原因，IPE开发者应补充评估标准的制定，并在规划评估中了解学习者的经历。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.