Optimal Small Bowel Limb Lengths of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

IF 9.5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Current Obesity Reports Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-19 DOI:10.1007/s13679-023-00513-4
Justin Eagleston, Abdelrahman Nimeri
{"title":"Optimal Small Bowel Limb Lengths of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.","authors":"Justin Eagleston,&nbsp;Abdelrahman Nimeri","doi":"10.1007/s13679-023-00513-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) have come full circle, from a loop configuration to a Roux-en-Y and finally back to a loop configuration as one anastomosis gastric bypass and single-anastomosis duodenal switch. Most surgeons performing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) do not measure the common channel (CC) length and most surgeons performing BPD do not measure the biliopancreatic limb length (BPL).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The small bowel length in humans is variable from as short as < 400 cm to as long as > 1000 cm. The combination of these two facts means that even if surgeons keep the limb lengths constant, surgeons will get variable limb length due to the variability of small bowel length in patients. Hence, outcomes of weight loss, resolution of medical problems, or developing nutritional deficiencies which are related to limb length are variable. In this article, we evaluate the published literature related to the effect of varying the Roux limb, BPL, CC, and total alimentary limb lengths on the outcomes of RYGB. We have focused on historical and current randomized controlled trials as well as systematic reviews and meta-analysis to outline the current literature and our interpretation of this literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":10846,"journal":{"name":"Current Obesity Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Obesity Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-023-00513-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) have come full circle, from a loop configuration to a Roux-en-Y and finally back to a loop configuration as one anastomosis gastric bypass and single-anastomosis duodenal switch. Most surgeons performing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) do not measure the common channel (CC) length and most surgeons performing BPD do not measure the biliopancreatic limb length (BPL).

Recent findings: The small bowel length in humans is variable from as short as < 400 cm to as long as > 1000 cm. The combination of these two facts means that even if surgeons keep the limb lengths constant, surgeons will get variable limb length due to the variability of small bowel length in patients. Hence, outcomes of weight loss, resolution of medical problems, or developing nutritional deficiencies which are related to limb length are variable. In this article, we evaluate the published literature related to the effect of varying the Roux limb, BPL, CC, and total alimentary limb lengths on the outcomes of RYGB. We have focused on historical and current randomized controlled trials as well as systematic reviews and meta-analysis to outline the current literature and our interpretation of this literature.

Abstract Image

Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的最佳小肠肢体长度。
综述目的:胃分流术和胆胰分流术(BPD)已经完成了一个完整的循环,从环状结构到Roux-en-Y,最后又回到环状结构,即单吻合胃分流和单吻合十二指肠开关。大多数进行Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)的外科医生不测量共管(CC)长度,大多数进行BPD的外科医生也不测量胆胰肢体长度(BPL)  1000厘米。这两个事实的结合意味着,即使外科医生保持肢体长度不变,由于患者小肠长度的可变性,外科医生也会得到可变的肢体长度。因此,与肢体长度有关的体重减轻、医疗问题的解决或营养缺乏的结果是可变的。在这篇文章中,我们评估了与改变Roux肢体、BPL、CC和总消化道肢体长度对RYGB结果的影响相关的已发表文献。我们专注于历史和当前的随机对照试验,以及系统综述和荟萃分析,以概述当前的文献和我们对这些文献的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Obesity Reports
Current Obesity Reports Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The main objective of Current Obesity Reports is to provide expert review articles on recent advancements in the interdisciplinary field of obesity research. Our aim is to offer clear, insightful, and balanced contributions that will benefit all individuals involved in the treatment and prevention of obesity, as well as related conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, endocrine disorders, gynecological issues, cancer, mental health, respiratory complications, and rheumatological diseases. We strive to redefine the way knowledge is expressed and provide organized content for the benefit of our readership.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信