In-hospital stroke and mortality trends after left ventricular assist device implantation in the United States from 2017 to 2019.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jose Lopez, Justin Mark, Waseem Wahood, Nader Lamaa, Mauricio Danckers
{"title":"In-hospital stroke and mortality trends after left ventricular assist device implantation in the United States from 2017 to 2019.","authors":"Jose Lopez,&nbsp;Justin Mark,&nbsp;Waseem Wahood,&nbsp;Nader Lamaa,&nbsp;Mauricio Danckers","doi":"10.1177/03913988231183723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The newer Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), the HeartMate 3 (HM3), was initially approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2017. We aimed to describe the temporal trends of in-hospital stroke and mortality among patients who underwent LVAD placement between 2017 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2017 to 2019 to identify all adults with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who underwent LVAD implantation using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. The Cochran-Armitage test was conducted to assess the linear trend of in-hospital stroke and mortality. In addition, multivariable regression analysis was conducted to assess the association of LVAD placement with in-hospital stroke and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5,087,280 patients met the selection criteria. Of those, 11,750 (0.2%) underwent LVAD implantation. There was a downtrend in in-hospital mortality per year (trend: -1.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.03), but not in the trend of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke per year. LVAD placement was associated with greater odds of stroke of any type (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.68-2.29, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.61, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found a significant downtrend in the in-hospital mortality rates among patients with LVAD without substantial changes in stroke rate trends over the study timeframe. As stroke rates remained steady, we hypothesize that improved management along with better control of blood pressure, could have played an important role in survival benefit over the study time frame.</p>","PeriodicalId":13932,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988231183723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The newer Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), the HeartMate 3 (HM3), was initially approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2017. We aimed to describe the temporal trends of in-hospital stroke and mortality among patients who underwent LVAD placement between 2017 and 2019.

Methods: The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2017 to 2019 to identify all adults with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who underwent LVAD implantation using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. The Cochran-Armitage test was conducted to assess the linear trend of in-hospital stroke and mortality. In addition, multivariable regression analysis was conducted to assess the association of LVAD placement with in-hospital stroke and death.

Results: A total of 5,087,280 patients met the selection criteria. Of those, 11,750 (0.2%) underwent LVAD implantation. There was a downtrend in in-hospital mortality per year (trend: -1.8%, p = 0.03), but not in the trend of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke per year. LVAD placement was associated with greater odds of stroke of any type (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.68-2.29, p < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.61, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our study found a significant downtrend in the in-hospital mortality rates among patients with LVAD without substantial changes in stroke rate trends over the study timeframe. As stroke rates remained steady, we hypothesize that improved management along with better control of blood pressure, could have played an important role in survival benefit over the study time frame.

2017年至2019年美国左心室辅助装置植入后住院卒中和死亡率趋势
背景:较新的左心室辅助装置(LVAD) HeartMate 3 (HM3)最初于2017年获得美国食品和药物管理局的批准。我们的目的是描述2017年至2019年期间接受LVAD安置的患者的住院卒中和死亡率的时间趋势。方法:对2017年至2019年的全国住院患者样本进行查询,使用国际疾病分类第十次修订代码对所有接受LVAD植入的心力衰竭和射血分数降低(HFrEF)的成年人进行鉴定。采用Cochran-Armitage检验评估住院卒中与死亡率的线性趋势。此外,我们还进行了多变量回归分析,以评估LVAD放置与院内卒中和死亡的关系。结果:共有5087280例患者符合入选标准。其中11,750例(0.2%)接受了LVAD植入。每年住院死亡率有下降趋势(趋势:-1.8%,p = 0.03),但每年缺血性和出血性卒中的趋势均无下降趋势。LVAD放置与任何类型的卒中发生率都有较大的相关性(OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.68-2.29, p p)。结论:我们的研究发现,在研究期间,LVAD患者的住院死亡率有显著下降趋势,但卒中发生率趋势没有实质性变化。由于中风率保持稳定,我们假设,在研究期间,改善管理以及更好地控制血压可能在生存获益中发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Artificial Organs
International Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Artificial Organs (IJAO) publishes peer-reviewed research and clinical, experimental and theoretical, contributions to the field of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs. The mission of the IJAO is to foster the development and optimization of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs, for implantation or use in procedures, to treat functional deficits of all human tissues and organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信