Ivabradine effects in hospitalized acute heart failure patients: a single center retrospective study.

IF 1.3
Mahmoud Abdelnabi, Juthipong Benjanuwattra, Yehia Saleh, Haitham Badran, Shadi Ahmed, Abdallah Almaghraby
{"title":"Ivabradine effects in hospitalized acute heart failure patients: a single center retrospective study.","authors":"Mahmoud Abdelnabi,&nbsp;Juthipong Benjanuwattra,&nbsp;Yehia Saleh,&nbsp;Haitham Badran,&nbsp;Shadi Ahmed,&nbsp;Abdallah Almaghraby","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increased heart rate (HR) is deleterious in patients with decompensated heart failure. Ivabradine, an HR lowering agent which acts by inhibiting the I<sub>f</sub> current in the sinoatrial node, is indicated for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, data regarding the safety and efficacy of ivabradine in acute decompensated heart failure is limited. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the effects of ivabradine on morbidity and short-term mortality of hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 998 patients with acute decompensated heart failure on top of a chronic status from 1/5/2014 to 1/5/2019 who were already on guideline-directed treatment including a beta-blocker were included. Patients were divided into two groups, the first group (No-ivabradine) where patients continued the same dose of beta-blocker alone while the second group (ivabradine group) ivabradine 5 mg BID was added in addition to the same dose of beta-blocker. Patients with hemodynamic instabilities were excluded from the study. Propensity matching was performed to exclude confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between groups regarding baseline patient characteristics, laboratory, and echocardiographic data. There were significant differences between groups regarding average HR (87 ± 15 and 90 ± 12 bpm in ivabradine and control groups, consecutively, P = 0.0006*) and length of hospital stay (5.3 ± 2.3 and 7.7 ± 5.6 days in ivabradine and control groups, consecutively, P < 0.0001*). However, there were no differences in rehospitalization and mortality rates at 1 month and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effects of ivabradine on morbidity and short-term mortality of hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Ivabradine was associated with significantly lower average HR and length of hospital stay. However, there was no benefit in the reduction of rehospitalization and mortality rates at 1- and 6-month follow-ups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7427,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","volume":"13 3","pages":"177-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352815/pdf/ajcd0013-0177.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An increased heart rate (HR) is deleterious in patients with decompensated heart failure. Ivabradine, an HR lowering agent which acts by inhibiting the If current in the sinoatrial node, is indicated for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, data regarding the safety and efficacy of ivabradine in acute decompensated heart failure is limited. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the effects of ivabradine on morbidity and short-term mortality of hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

Methods: A total of 998 patients with acute decompensated heart failure on top of a chronic status from 1/5/2014 to 1/5/2019 who were already on guideline-directed treatment including a beta-blocker were included. Patients were divided into two groups, the first group (No-ivabradine) where patients continued the same dose of beta-blocker alone while the second group (ivabradine group) ivabradine 5 mg BID was added in addition to the same dose of beta-blocker. Patients with hemodynamic instabilities were excluded from the study. Propensity matching was performed to exclude confounding factors.

Results: There was no significant difference between groups regarding baseline patient characteristics, laboratory, and echocardiographic data. There were significant differences between groups regarding average HR (87 ± 15 and 90 ± 12 bpm in ivabradine and control groups, consecutively, P = 0.0006*) and length of hospital stay (5.3 ± 2.3 and 7.7 ± 5.6 days in ivabradine and control groups, consecutively, P < 0.0001*). However, there were no differences in rehospitalization and mortality rates at 1 month and 6 months.

Conclusion: In a retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effects of ivabradine on morbidity and short-term mortality of hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Ivabradine was associated with significantly lower average HR and length of hospital stay. However, there was no benefit in the reduction of rehospitalization and mortality rates at 1- and 6-month follow-ups.

伊伐布雷定对住院急性心力衰竭患者的影响:单中心回顾性研究。
背景:心率(HR)增加对失代偿性心力衰竭患者是有害的。伊伐布雷定是一种降低心率的药物,通过抑制窦房结的If电流起作用,适用于射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭。然而,关于伊伐布雷定在急性失代偿性心力衰竭中的安全性和有效性的数据有限。本回顾性观察性研究旨在探讨伊伐布雷定对急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者发病率和短期死亡率的影响。方法:从2014年5月1日至2019年5月1日,共纳入998例慢性急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者,这些患者已经接受了包括β受体阻滞剂在内的指南指导治疗。患者被分为两组,第一组(无伊瓦布雷定)患者继续单独使用相同剂量的β受体阻滞剂,而第二组(伊瓦布雷定组)患者在相同剂量的β受体阻滞剂的基础上添加伊瓦布雷定5mg BID。血流动力学不稳定的患者被排除在研究之外。进行倾向匹配以排除混杂因素。结果:两组之间在基线患者特征、实验室和超声心动图数据方面无显著差异。各组间平均心率(伊伐布雷定组与对照组分别为87±15和90±12 bpm,连续P = 0.0006*)和住院时间(伊伐布雷定组与对照组分别为5.3±2.3和7.7±5.6天,连续P < 0.0001*)差异均有统计学意义。然而,1个月和6个月的再住院率和死亡率没有差异。结论:在一项回顾性队列研究中,旨在探讨伊伐布雷定对急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者发病率和短期死亡率的影响。伊伐布雷定与较低的平均HR和住院时间相关。然而,在1个月和6个月的随访中,在降低再住院率和死亡率方面没有任何益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of cardiovascular disease
American journal of cardiovascular disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信