Screening for hypertension in adults - the use of tonometric blood pressure monitoring.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000679
Bodil G Hornstrup, Jeppe B Rosenbæk, Nikolai Hoffmann-Petersen, Jesper N Bech
{"title":"Screening for hypertension in adults - the use of tonometric blood pressure monitoring.","authors":"Bodil G Hornstrup, Jeppe B Rosenbæk, Nikolai Hoffmann-Petersen, Jesper N Bech","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Arterial hypertension increases the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Reliable screening tools for diagnosing hypertension are important to ensure correct risk stratification of subjects. In this study, we aimed to analyse if a wrist-worn device using a tonometric technique for measuring of 24-hour blood pressure could be used to diagnose hypertension and non-dipping. A conventional device using oscillometric measurements was used as golden standard. Secondary aim was to compare the degree of discomfort related to monitoring with the two devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 89 subjects with a history of normal blood pressure and naive to ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), 24-hour ABPM was measured simultaneously with A&D TM2430 (oscillometric technique) and BPro (tonometric technique).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing measurements from the two devices, we found that the tonometric device misclassified 46% of hypertensive subjects and 69% of non-dippers. The tonometric device measured significantly lower systolic 24-hour and daytime blood pressure. The subjects reported less discomfort related to the tonometric than the oscillometric device.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite less discomfort related to usage of the tonometric device for 24-hour blood pressure monitoring compared to an oscillometric device, misclassification of hypertension and non-dipping makes the tonometric device inappropriate as a screening instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10766095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Arterial hypertension increases the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Reliable screening tools for diagnosing hypertension are important to ensure correct risk stratification of subjects. In this study, we aimed to analyse if a wrist-worn device using a tonometric technique for measuring of 24-hour blood pressure could be used to diagnose hypertension and non-dipping. A conventional device using oscillometric measurements was used as golden standard. Secondary aim was to compare the degree of discomfort related to monitoring with the two devices.

Methods: In 89 subjects with a history of normal blood pressure and naive to ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), 24-hour ABPM was measured simultaneously with A&D TM2430 (oscillometric technique) and BPro (tonometric technique).

Results: When comparing measurements from the two devices, we found that the tonometric device misclassified 46% of hypertensive subjects and 69% of non-dippers. The tonometric device measured significantly lower systolic 24-hour and daytime blood pressure. The subjects reported less discomfort related to the tonometric than the oscillometric device.

Conclusion: Despite less discomfort related to usage of the tonometric device for 24-hour blood pressure monitoring compared to an oscillometric device, misclassification of hypertension and non-dipping makes the tonometric device inappropriate as a screening instrument.

成人高血压筛查--使用眼压计监测血压。
目的:动脉高血压会增加罹患心血管疾病的风险。诊断高血压的可靠筛查工具对于确保对受试者进行正确的风险分层非常重要。在这项研究中,我们旨在分析使用眼压测量技术测量 24 小时血压的腕戴式设备是否可用于诊断高血压和非浸润性高血压。我们将使用示波测量法的传统设备作为黄金标准。次要目的是比较两种设备在监测过程中的不适程度:方法:在 89 名血压正常且对非卧床血压监测(ABPM)一无所知的受试者中,使用 A&D TM2430(示波测量技术)和 BPro(眼压测量技术)同时测量 24 小时 ABPM:结果:在比较两种设备的测量结果时,我们发现测压设备误判了 46% 的高血压受试者和 69% 的非糖尿病患者。眼压测量仪测得的 24 小时收缩压和日间血压明显较低。受试者在使用测压设备时的不适感要少于使用示波测压设备时的不适感:结论:尽管与示波测量仪相比,使用气压测量仪进行 24 小时血压监测的不适感较小,但对高血压和非杓型血压的错误分类使气压测量仪不适合作为筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Blood Pressure Monitoring 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research. This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信