External Validation of Two Scoring Tools to Predict the Operative Duration and Open Conversion of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Mexican Population.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gustavo Martínez-Mier, Daniel Mendez-Rico, José Manuel Reyes-Ruiz, Pedro Ivan Moreno-Ley, Victor Bernal-Dolores, Octavio Avila-Mercado
{"title":"External Validation of Two Scoring Tools to Predict the Operative Duration and Open Conversion of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Mexican Population.","authors":"Gustavo Martínez-Mier,&nbsp;Daniel Mendez-Rico,&nbsp;José Manuel Reyes-Ruiz,&nbsp;Pedro Ivan Moreno-Ley,&nbsp;Victor Bernal-Dolores,&nbsp;Octavio Avila-Mercado","doi":"10.1159/000531087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) operative time (CholeS score) and conversion to an open procedure (CLOC score) outside their validation dataset in Mexican population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients &gt;18 years who underwent elective LC were analyzed in a single-center retrospective chart review study. Association between scores (CholeS and CLOC) with operative time and conversion to open procedures was assessed with Spearman correlation. The predictive accuracy of the CholeS score and CLOC score was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>200 patients were included in the study (33 excluded for emergency case or missing data). Spearman coefficient correlations between CholeS or CLOC score and operative time were 0.456 (p &lt; 0.0001) and 0.356 (p &lt; 0.0001), respectively. Area under the curve (AUC) for operative prediction time (&gt;90 min) by CholeS score was 0.786 with a 3.5-point cutoff (80% sensitivity and 63.2% specificity). AUC for open conversion (CLOC score) was 0.78 with a 5-point cutoff (60% sensitivity and 91% specificity). The CLOC score had a 0.740 AUC (64% sensitivity and 72.8% specificity) for operative time &gt;90 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CholeS and the CLOC scores predicted LC long operative time and risk for conversion to an open procedure, respectively, outside their original validation set.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":"40 3-4","pages":"108-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) operative time (CholeS score) and conversion to an open procedure (CLOC score) outside their validation dataset in Mexican population.

Methods: Patients >18 years who underwent elective LC were analyzed in a single-center retrospective chart review study. Association between scores (CholeS and CLOC) with operative time and conversion to open procedures was assessed with Spearman correlation. The predictive accuracy of the CholeS score and CLOC score was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic.

Results: 200 patients were included in the study (33 excluded for emergency case or missing data). Spearman coefficient correlations between CholeS or CLOC score and operative time were 0.456 (p < 0.0001) and 0.356 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Area under the curve (AUC) for operative prediction time (>90 min) by CholeS score was 0.786 with a 3.5-point cutoff (80% sensitivity and 63.2% specificity). AUC for open conversion (CLOC score) was 0.78 with a 5-point cutoff (60% sensitivity and 91% specificity). The CLOC score had a 0.740 AUC (64% sensitivity and 72.8% specificity) for operative time >90 min.

Conclusions: The CholeS and the CLOC scores predicted LC long operative time and risk for conversion to an open procedure, respectively, outside their original validation set.

两种评分工具预测墨西哥人群择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术时间和开放转换的外部验证。
简介:本研究旨在评估墨西哥人群在验证数据集之外使用腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)手术时间(CholeS评分)和转换为开放式手术(CLOC评分)。方法:在一项单中心回顾性图表回顾研究中,对18岁的选择性LC患者进行分析。采用Spearman相关性评估评分(CholeS和CLOC)与手术时间和转开腹手术的关系。采用受者操作者特征评价CholeS评分和CLOC评分的预测准确性。结果:200例患者纳入研究(33例因急诊病例或资料缺失而被排除)。CholeS或CLOC评分与手术时间的Spearman系数相关性为0.456 (p <0.0001)和0.356 (p <分别为0.0001)。通过CholeS评分预测手术时间(>90 min)的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.786,截止点为3.5分(敏感性80%,特异性63.2%)。开放转换的AUC (CLOC评分)为0.78,临界值为5分(60%的敏感性和91%的特异性)。手术时间为90分钟时,CLOC评分为0.740 AUC(64%敏感性和72.8%特异性)。结论:CholeS和CLOC评分分别预测了LC较长的手术时间和转换为开放手术的风险,超出了其原始验证集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Surgery
Digestive Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Digestive Surgery'' presents a comprehensive overview in the field of gastrointestinal surgery. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal keeps the specialist aware of advances in all fields that contribute to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Particular emphasis is given to articles that evaluate not only recent clinical developments, especially clinical trials and technical innovations such as new endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures, but also relevant translational research. Each contribution is carefully aligned with the need of the digestive surgeon. Thus, the journal is an important component of the continuing medical education of surgeons who want their practice to benefit from a familiarity with new knowledge in all its dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信