Using Coronary Artery Calcium Score as Diagnostic Tool in Symptomatic Chronic Coronary Syndrome Patients in a Real-Life Setting.

IF 2.6 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
M Patrick Witvliet, E Karin Arkenbout, Pieter W Kamphuisen
{"title":"Using Coronary Artery Calcium Score as Diagnostic Tool in Symptomatic Chronic Coronary Syndrome Patients in a Real-Life Setting.","authors":"M Patrick Witvliet,&nbsp;E Karin Arkenbout,&nbsp;Pieter W Kamphuisen","doi":"10.2147/VHRM.S422458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score can be used to increase (CAC score > 0) or decrease (CAC score = 0) the likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD). We compared the CAC score with the pre-test probability (PTP) for CAD (low, intermediate, and high). Furthermore, we compared the CAC score with exercise electrocardiography (ECG) and compared both tests with coronary angiography.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients with angina and/or dyspnea for whom CAC score was used to increase or decrease the likelihood of CAD. Of 882 patients, majority had low (45%) or intermediate (44%) PTP. Patients with higher PTP had significantly higher CAC scores (Cramer's V = 0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Most patients (57%) had a CAC score of zero, especially those with low (73%) and intermediate (49%) PTP. However, 20% of patients with high PTP had CAC score of zero. Higher CAC scores were observed in patients with abnormal exercise ECG, but association was weak and not significant (Cramer's V = 0.13, <i>p</i> = 0.08). Moreover, more than 40% of patients with an abnormal exercise ECG had CAC score of zero. Higher CAC scores were associated with more severe abnormalities on coronary angiography (Cramer's V = 0.43, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), whereas there was no association between results of exercise ECG and coronary angiography (Cramer's V = 0.11, <i>p</i> = 0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAC score can be used in addition to PTP to increase or decrease the likelihood of CAD, and it might be more useful than exercise ECG in the diagnostic work-up of chest pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":23597,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","volume":"19 ","pages":"571-582"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/4f/vhrm-19-571.PMC10492558.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S422458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score can be used to increase (CAC score > 0) or decrease (CAC score = 0) the likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD). We compared the CAC score with the pre-test probability (PTP) for CAD (low, intermediate, and high). Furthermore, we compared the CAC score with exercise electrocardiography (ECG) and compared both tests with coronary angiography.

Methods and results: We retrospectively identified patients with angina and/or dyspnea for whom CAC score was used to increase or decrease the likelihood of CAD. Of 882 patients, majority had low (45%) or intermediate (44%) PTP. Patients with higher PTP had significantly higher CAC scores (Cramer's V = 0.29, p < 0.0001). Most patients (57%) had a CAC score of zero, especially those with low (73%) and intermediate (49%) PTP. However, 20% of patients with high PTP had CAC score of zero. Higher CAC scores were observed in patients with abnormal exercise ECG, but association was weak and not significant (Cramer's V = 0.13, p = 0.08). Moreover, more than 40% of patients with an abnormal exercise ECG had CAC score of zero. Higher CAC scores were associated with more severe abnormalities on coronary angiography (Cramer's V = 0.43, p < 0.0001), whereas there was no association between results of exercise ECG and coronary angiography (Cramer's V = 0.11, p = 0.91).

Conclusion: CAC score can be used in addition to PTP to increase or decrease the likelihood of CAD, and it might be more useful than exercise ECG in the diagnostic work-up of chest pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

冠状动脉钙化评分在慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断中的应用
背景:冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分可用于增加(CAC评分> 0)或降低(CAC评分= 0)冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的可能性。我们将CAC评分与CAD的预测概率(PTP)(低、中、高)进行比较。此外,我们将CAC评分与运动心电图(ECG)进行比较,并将这两项测试与冠状动脉造影进行比较。方法和结果:我们回顾性地确定了使用CAC评分来增加或减少冠心病可能性的心绞痛和/或呼吸困难患者。在882例患者中,大多数PTP为低(45%)或中等(44%)。PTP越高的患者CAC评分越高(Cramer’s V = 0.29, p < 0.0001)。大多数患者(57%)的CAC评分为零,特别是低(73%)和中等(49%)PTP的患者。然而,20%的高PTP患者的CAC评分为零。运动心电图异常患者的CAC评分较高,但相关性较弱且不显著(Cramer’s V = 0.13, p = 0.08)。此外,超过40%的运动心电图异常患者的CAC评分为零。CAC评分越高,冠状动脉造影异常越严重(Cramer’s V = 0.43, p < 0.0001),而运动心电图结果与冠状动脉造影结果无相关性(Cramer’s V = 0.11, p = 0.91)。结论:CAC评分可与PTP联合用于增加或减少冠心病发生的可能性,在胸痛诊断中可能比运动心电图更有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular Health and Risk Management
Vascular Health and Risk Management PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies on the processes involved in the maintenance of vascular health; the monitoring, prevention, and treatment of vascular disease and its sequelae; and the involvement of metabolic disorders, particularly diabetes. In addition, the journal will also seek to define drug usage in terms of ultimate uptake and acceptance by the patient and healthcare professional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信