Linking the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale and the Severe Impairment Battery: evidence from individual participant data from five randomised clinical trials of donepezil.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Stephen Z Levine, Kazufumi Yoshida, Yair Goldberg, Myrto Samara, Andrea Cipriani, Orestis Efthimiou, Takeshi Iwatsubo, Stefan Leucht, Toshi A Furukawa
{"title":"Linking the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale and the Severe Impairment Battery: evidence from individual participant data from five randomised clinical trials of donepezil.","authors":"Stephen Z Levine,&nbsp;Kazufumi Yoshida,&nbsp;Yair Goldberg,&nbsp;Myrto Samara,&nbsp;Andrea Cipriani,&nbsp;Orestis Efthimiou,&nbsp;Takeshi Iwatsubo,&nbsp;Stefan Leucht,&nbsp;Toshi A Furukawa","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) are widely used rating scales to assess cognition in Alzheimer's disease.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the correspondence between these rating scales, we aimed to examine the linkage of MMSE with the ADAS-Cog and SIB total and change scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used individual-level data on participants with Alzheimer's disease (n=2925) from five pivotal clinical trials of donepezil. Data were collected at baseline and scheduled visits for up to 6 months. We used equipercentile linking to identify the correspondence between simultaneous measurements of MMSE with ADAS-Cog, and SIB total and change ratings.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Spearman's correlation coefficients were of strong magnitude between the MMSE total score and the ADAS-Cog (rs from -0.82 to -0.87; p<0.05) and SIB total scores (rs from 0.70 to 0.75; p<0.05). Weaker correlations between the change scores were observed between the MMSE change score and the ADAS-Cog (week 1: r=-0.11, p=0.18; rs thereafter: -0.28 to -0.45; p<0.05) and SIB change scores (rs from 0.31 to 0.44; p<0.05). Linking suggested that the MMSE total scores were sensitive to moderate and severe cognitive impairment levels. Despite weak to moderate correlations for the change scores, moderate change levels linked well, indicating ceiling and floor effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current results can be used in meta-analyses, data harmonisation and may contribute to increasing statistical power when pooling data from multiple sources.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The current study results help clinicians to understand these cognitive rating scale scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231617/pdf/ebmental-2020-300184.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) are widely used rating scales to assess cognition in Alzheimer's disease.

Objective: To understand the correspondence between these rating scales, we aimed to examine the linkage of MMSE with the ADAS-Cog and SIB total and change scores.

Methods: We used individual-level data on participants with Alzheimer's disease (n=2925) from five pivotal clinical trials of donepezil. Data were collected at baseline and scheduled visits for up to 6 months. We used equipercentile linking to identify the correspondence between simultaneous measurements of MMSE with ADAS-Cog, and SIB total and change ratings.

Findings: Spearman's correlation coefficients were of strong magnitude between the MMSE total score and the ADAS-Cog (rs from -0.82 to -0.87; p<0.05) and SIB total scores (rs from 0.70 to 0.75; p<0.05). Weaker correlations between the change scores were observed between the MMSE change score and the ADAS-Cog (week 1: r=-0.11, p=0.18; rs thereafter: -0.28 to -0.45; p<0.05) and SIB change scores (rs from 0.31 to 0.44; p<0.05). Linking suggested that the MMSE total scores were sensitive to moderate and severe cognitive impairment levels. Despite weak to moderate correlations for the change scores, moderate change levels linked well, indicating ceiling and floor effects.

Conclusions: The current results can be used in meta-analyses, data harmonisation and may contribute to increasing statistical power when pooling data from multiple sources.

Clinical implications: The current study results help clinicians to understand these cognitive rating scale scores.

连接迷你精神状态检查,阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知亚量表和严重损伤电池:来自多奈哌齐五项随机临床试验的个体参与者数据的证据。
背景:迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)、阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知亚量表(ADAS-Cog)和严重损害量表(SIB)是广泛应用于阿尔茨海默病认知评估的评定量表。目的:为了了解这些评定量表之间的对应关系,我们旨在研究MMSE与ADAS-Cog和SIB总得分和变化得分的联系。方法:我们使用了来自多奈哌齐5项关键临床试验的阿尔茨海默病患者的个体水平数据(n=2925)。数据收集在基线和计划访问长达6个月。我们使用等百分位链接来确定ADAS-Cog同时测量的MMSE与SIB总量和变化评级之间的对应关系。结果:MMSE总分与ADAS-Cog之间的Spearman相关系数较强(rs为-0.82 ~ -0.87;结论:当前的结果可用于荟萃分析、数据协调,并可能有助于在汇集来自多个来源的数据时提高统计能力。临床意义:目前的研究结果有助于临床医生理解这些认知评定量表得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信