Leisure Participation of Autistic Adults: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Feasibility Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Wei Song, Linda Zheng, Renáta Tichá, Brian Abery, Viann N Nguyen-Feng
{"title":"Leisure Participation of Autistic Adults: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Feasibility Study.","authors":"Wei Song,&nbsp;Linda Zheng,&nbsp;Renáta Tichá,&nbsp;Brian Abery,&nbsp;Viann N Nguyen-Feng","doi":"10.1352/1944-7558-128.4.319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autistic adults participate less and express lower satisfaction in leisure activities than nonautistic adults, although literature is limited. The multifaceted nature of leisure participation makes it challenging to measure, with most measures being retrospective. Ecological momentary assessments (EMA) can reduce recall bias. This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of EMA among autistic adults. Participants (N = 40) were recruited via email and online. After completing a baseline interview, participants were asked to complete a once-daily survey for 30 days, in which they received survey links through a text messaging smartphone app. Surveys asked participants to report whether they participated in any leisure activities during the day, their level of enjoyment, with whom they interacted, and where they participated. The EMA appeared feasible in this sample, as participants completed the daily survey on average 27.05 (SD = 3.92) days. Regarding acceptability, most agreed that survey timing was convenient, that it was easy to enter responses and answer questions daily, and that they had enough response time. Overall, this study supports the use of EMA methodology among autistic adults. Future research should follow and improve upon these EMA data collection practices to examine daily behavior and well-being among autistic adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51508,"journal":{"name":"Ajidd-American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":"128 4","pages":"319-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ajidd-American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-128.4.319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autistic adults participate less and express lower satisfaction in leisure activities than nonautistic adults, although literature is limited. The multifaceted nature of leisure participation makes it challenging to measure, with most measures being retrospective. Ecological momentary assessments (EMA) can reduce recall bias. This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of EMA among autistic adults. Participants (N = 40) were recruited via email and online. After completing a baseline interview, participants were asked to complete a once-daily survey for 30 days, in which they received survey links through a text messaging smartphone app. Surveys asked participants to report whether they participated in any leisure activities during the day, their level of enjoyment, with whom they interacted, and where they participated. The EMA appeared feasible in this sample, as participants completed the daily survey on average 27.05 (SD = 3.92) days. Regarding acceptability, most agreed that survey timing was convenient, that it was easy to enter responses and answer questions daily, and that they had enough response time. Overall, this study supports the use of EMA methodology among autistic adults. Future research should follow and improve upon these EMA data collection practices to examine daily behavior and well-being among autistic adults.

自闭症成年人的休闲参与:一项生态瞬时评估的可行性研究。
尽管文献有限,但自闭症成年人在休闲活动中的参与度和满意度都低于非自闭症成年人。休闲参与的多方面性质使得衡量具有挑战性,大多数衡量都是回顾性的。生态瞬时评估(EMA)可以减少回忆偏差。这项试点研究评估了EMA在自闭症成年人中的可行性和可接受性。参与者(N=40)通过电子邮件和在线招募。在完成基线访谈后,参与者被要求完成一项为期30天的每日一次的调查,在调查中,他们通过短信智能手机应用程序收到调查链接。调查要求参与者报告他们白天是否参加过任何休闲活动,他们的享受程度,与谁互动,以及在哪里参加。EMA在该样本中似乎是可行的,因为参与者平均在27.05天(SD=3.92)完成了每日调查。关于可接受性,大多数人都认为调查时间很方便,每天输入回复和回答问题很容易,而且他们有足够的回复时间。总的来说,这项研究支持在自闭症成年人中使用EMA方法。未来的研究应该遵循并改进这些EMA数据收集实践,以检查自闭症成年人的日常行为和幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (Print ISSN: 1944–7515; Online ISSN: 1944–7558) is published by the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. It is a scientifi c, scholarly, and archival multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions of the highest quality to knowledge of intellectual disabilities, its causes, treatment, and prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信