Naomi Myhill, Dan Weaving, Mark Robinson, Steve Barrett, Stacey Emmonds
{"title":"Concurrent validity and between-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit to measure velocity during team sport activity.","authors":"Naomi Myhill, Dan Weaving, Mark Robinson, Steve Barrett, Stacey Emmonds","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2023.2237493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concurrent validity and between-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (F-IMU) was investigated during linear and change of direction running drills. Sixteen individuals performed four repetitions of two drills (maximal acceleration and flying 10 m sprint) and five repetitions of a multi-directional movement protocol. Participants wore two F-IMUs (Playermaker) and 10 retro-reflective markers to allow for comparisons to the criterion system (Qualisys). Validity of the F-IMU derived velocity was assessed via root-mean-square error (RMSE), 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI). Between-unit reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation (ICC) with 90% CI and 95% LoA. The mean difference for instantaneous velocity for all participants and drills combined was -0.048 ± 0.581 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>, the LoA were from -1.09 to -1.186 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup> and RMSE was 0.583 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>. The ICC ranged from 0.84 to 1, with LoA from -7.412 to 2.924 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>. Differences were dependent on the reference speed, with the greatest absolute difference (-0.66 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>) found at velocities above 7 m ∙ s<sup>-1</sup>. Between-unit reliability of the F-IMU ranges from good to excellent for all locomotor characteristics. Playermaker has good agreement with 3D motion capture for velocity and good to excellent between-unit reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":74767,"journal":{"name":"Science & medicine in football","volume":" ","pages":"308-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & medicine in football","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2023.2237493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concurrent validity and between-unit reliability of a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (F-IMU) was investigated during linear and change of direction running drills. Sixteen individuals performed four repetitions of two drills (maximal acceleration and flying 10 m sprint) and five repetitions of a multi-directional movement protocol. Participants wore two F-IMUs (Playermaker) and 10 retro-reflective markers to allow for comparisons to the criterion system (Qualisys). Validity of the F-IMU derived velocity was assessed via root-mean-square error (RMSE), 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI). Between-unit reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation (ICC) with 90% CI and 95% LoA. The mean difference for instantaneous velocity for all participants and drills combined was -0.048 ± 0.581 m ∙ s-1, the LoA were from -1.09 to -1.186 m ∙ s-1 and RMSE was 0.583 m ∙ s-1. The ICC ranged from 0.84 to 1, with LoA from -7.412 to 2.924 m ∙ s-1. Differences were dependent on the reference speed, with the greatest absolute difference (-0.66 m ∙ s-1) found at velocities above 7 m ∙ s-1. Between-unit reliability of the F-IMU ranges from good to excellent for all locomotor characteristics. Playermaker has good agreement with 3D motion capture for velocity and good to excellent between-unit reliability.