Perioperative Oncology Health Care Providers and Transgender Health: A Single-Institution Survey to Gauge Attitudes, Knowledge, Behaviors, and Education.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences
Richard Shi, Cindy Yeoh, Jasme Lee, Kay See Tan, Gloria Yang, Kelly Haviland, Chasity Walters, Luis Tollinche
{"title":"Perioperative Oncology Health Care Providers and Transgender Health: A Single-Institution Survey to Gauge Attitudes, Knowledge, Behaviors, and Education.","authors":"Richard Shi, Cindy Yeoh, Jasme Lee, Kay See Tan, Gloria Yang, Kelly Haviland, Chasity Walters, Luis Tollinche","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2021.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients identifying as transgender report that a lack of access to providers with trans-specific medical knowledge represents one of the largest barriers to equitable health care access. Through an institutional survey, we assessed and analyzed the attitudes, knowledge, behaviors, and education of perioperative clinical staff when caring for transgender patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was distributed to 1100 perioperative clinical staff at the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in New York City between January 14, 2020, and February 28, 2020, and received 276 responses. The survey instrument consisted of 42 nondemographic questions about attitudes, knowledge, behaviors, and education regarding transgender health care and 14 demographic questions. Questions were presented as a mix of Yes/No, free text response, and a 5-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Certain demographic groups (younger, lesbian, gay, or bisexual [LGB], fewer years employment at the institution) held more favorable attitudes toward the transgender population and were more knowledgeable regarding their health needs. Respondents underreported the rates of mental illness and risk factors for cancer like HIV and substance use among the transgender population. A greater proportion of respondents identifying as LGB endorsed witnessing an interaction wherein a colleague exhibited attitudes/beliefs about the transgender population that were barriers to care. Only 23.2% of respondents were ever trained on the health needs of transgender patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need for institutions to assess the cultural competency of perioperative clinical staff toward transgender health, especially within certain demographics. This survey may inform quality education initiatives to eliminate biases and knowledge gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":37265,"journal":{"name":"Transgender Health","volume":"8 3","pages":"254-263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2021.0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients identifying as transgender report that a lack of access to providers with trans-specific medical knowledge represents one of the largest barriers to equitable health care access. Through an institutional survey, we assessed and analyzed the attitudes, knowledge, behaviors, and education of perioperative clinical staff when caring for transgender patients with cancer.

Methods: A web-based survey was distributed to 1100 perioperative clinical staff at the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in New York City between January 14, 2020, and February 28, 2020, and received 276 responses. The survey instrument consisted of 42 nondemographic questions about attitudes, knowledge, behaviors, and education regarding transgender health care and 14 demographic questions. Questions were presented as a mix of Yes/No, free text response, and a 5-point Likert scale.

Results: Certain demographic groups (younger, lesbian, gay, or bisexual [LGB], fewer years employment at the institution) held more favorable attitudes toward the transgender population and were more knowledgeable regarding their health needs. Respondents underreported the rates of mental illness and risk factors for cancer like HIV and substance use among the transgender population. A greater proportion of respondents identifying as LGB endorsed witnessing an interaction wherein a colleague exhibited attitudes/beliefs about the transgender population that were barriers to care. Only 23.2% of respondents were ever trained on the health needs of transgender patients.

Conclusion: There is a need for institutions to assess the cultural competency of perioperative clinical staff toward transgender health, especially within certain demographics. This survey may inform quality education initiatives to eliminate biases and knowledge gaps.

肿瘤围手术期医护人员与变性人健康:一项旨在衡量态度、知识、行为和教育的单一机构调查。
目的:变性患者报告称,缺乏具备变性医学知识的医疗服务提供者是阻碍公平医疗服务的最大障碍之一。通过一项机构调查,我们评估并分析了围手术期临床工作人员在护理癌症变性患者时的态度、知识、行为和教育情况:2020年1月14日至2020年2月28日期间,我们向纽约市国家癌症研究所(NCI)指定的综合癌症中心的1100名围手术期临床工作人员发放了一份网络调查问卷,共收到276份回复。调查工具包括 42 个有关变性人医疗保健的态度、知识、行为和教育的非人口统计学问题和 14 个人口统计学问题。问题以 "是/否"、自由文本回答和 5 点李克特量表的混合形式呈现:结果:某些人口统计学群体(年轻、女同性恋、男同性恋或双性恋、在该机构工作年限较短)对变性人持有更有利的态度,并对他们的健康需求有更多了解。受访者低估了跨性别人群中的精神疾病发病率和癌症风险因素(如 HIV 和药物使用)。有较大比例的受访者认为自己是女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人,并表示曾亲眼目睹同事对变性人的态度/信念成为医疗保健的障碍。只有 23.2% 的受访者接受过有关变性患者健康需求的培训:各医疗机构有必要评估围手术期临床医护人员对变性人健康的文化胜任能力,尤其是在某些人群中。这项调查可为质量教育活动提供信息,以消除偏见和知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transgender Health
Transgender Health Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
122
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信