Therapeutic outcomes of early and delayed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage in patients with obstructive severe acute biliary pancreatitis.

Xue Ling Zhang, Jia Huan Sun, Yue Wu, Min Xie, Cong Cong Li, Dong Lv, Wei Yu, Pei Lin Cui
{"title":"Therapeutic outcomes of early and delayed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage in patients with obstructive severe acute biliary pancreatitis.","authors":"Xue Ling Zhang,&nbsp;Jia Huan Sun,&nbsp;Yue Wu,&nbsp;Min Xie,&nbsp;Cong Cong Li,&nbsp;Dong Lv,&nbsp;Wei Yu,&nbsp;Pei Lin Cui","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive severe acute biliary pancreatitis (SABP) is a clinical emergency with a high rate of mortality that can be alleviated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) selectively. However, the optimal timing of ERCP and PTCD requires elucidation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome parameters in patients with SABP subjected to ERCP and PTCD compared to SABP patients who were not subjected to any form of invasive intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 62 patients with obstructive SABP who had been treated from July 2013 to July 2019 were included in this retrospective case-control study and stratified into a PTCD group (N = 22), ERCP group (N = 24), and conservative treatment group (N = 16, control). Patients in the PTCD and ERCP groups were substratified into early (≤72 h) and delayed (>72 h) treatment groups based on the timing of the intervention after diagnosis. Clinical chemistry, hospitalization days, liver function, abdominal pain, and complications were determined to assess the treatment efficacy and safety of each modality and to establish the optimal timing for PTCD and ERCP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average hospitalization time, time to abdominal pain relief, and time to normalization of hematological and clinical chemistry parameters (leukocyte count, amylase, alanine transaminase [ALT], and total bilirubin [TBiL]) were shorter in the PTCD and ERCP groups compared to the conservative treatment group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The average hospitalization time in the ERCP group (16.7 ± 4.0 d) was shorter compared to the PTCD group (19.6 ± 4.3 d) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Compared to the conservative treatment group (62.5%), there were more complications in patients treated with ERCP and PTCD (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the early ERCP group, the average hospitalization time (13.9 ± 3.3 d) and the time to normalization of leukocyte count (6.3 ± 0.9 d) and TBiL (9.1 ± 2.0 d) were lower than in the delayed ERCP group (18.6 ± 4.1 d, 9.9 ± 2.4 d, 11.8 ± 2.9 d, respectively) and early PTCD group (16.4 ± 3.7 d, 8.5 ± 2.1 d, 10.9 ± 3.1 d, respectively) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the delayed ERCP group, the average hospitalization time (18.6 ± 4.1 d) and ALT recovery time (12.2 ± 2.6 d) were lower than in the delayed PTCD group (21.9 ± 4.3 d and 14.9 ± 3.9 d, respectively) (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERCP and PTCD effectively relieve SABP-associated biliary obstruction with comparable overall incidence of complications. It is recommended that ERCP is performed within 72 h after diagnosis; and PTCD drainage may be considered an alternative approach in cases where patients are unable or unwilling to undergo ERCP, or when ERCP is unsuccessful.</p><p><strong>Relevance for patients: </strong>ERCP and PTCD in patients with obstructive SABP can resolve biliary obstruction and delay progression of the disease. Performing ERCP and PTCD within 72 h (i.e., optimal treatment time window) can be beneficial to patients, especially in terms of post-operative recovery. Visual biliary endoscopy (oral or percutaneous transhepatic) may be used for concomitant therapeutic interventions in the biliary system.</p>","PeriodicalId":15482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Research","volume":"9 3","pages":"160-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/60/f1/jclintranslres-2023-9-3-160.PMC10339408.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstructive severe acute biliary pancreatitis (SABP) is a clinical emergency with a high rate of mortality that can be alleviated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) selectively. However, the optimal timing of ERCP and PTCD requires elucidation.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome parameters in patients with SABP subjected to ERCP and PTCD compared to SABP patients who were not subjected to any form of invasive intervention.

Methods: A total of 62 patients with obstructive SABP who had been treated from July 2013 to July 2019 were included in this retrospective case-control study and stratified into a PTCD group (N = 22), ERCP group (N = 24), and conservative treatment group (N = 16, control). Patients in the PTCD and ERCP groups were substratified into early (≤72 h) and delayed (>72 h) treatment groups based on the timing of the intervention after diagnosis. Clinical chemistry, hospitalization days, liver function, abdominal pain, and complications were determined to assess the treatment efficacy and safety of each modality and to establish the optimal timing for PTCD and ERCP.

Results: The average hospitalization time, time to abdominal pain relief, and time to normalization of hematological and clinical chemistry parameters (leukocyte count, amylase, alanine transaminase [ALT], and total bilirubin [TBiL]) were shorter in the PTCD and ERCP groups compared to the conservative treatment group (p < 0.05). The average hospitalization time in the ERCP group (16.7 ± 4.0 d) was shorter compared to the PTCD group (19.6 ± 4.3 d) (p < 0.05). Compared to the conservative treatment group (62.5%), there were more complications in patients treated with ERCP and PTCD (p < 0.05). In the early ERCP group, the average hospitalization time (13.9 ± 3.3 d) and the time to normalization of leukocyte count (6.3 ± 0.9 d) and TBiL (9.1 ± 2.0 d) were lower than in the delayed ERCP group (18.6 ± 4.1 d, 9.9 ± 2.4 d, 11.8 ± 2.9 d, respectively) and early PTCD group (16.4 ± 3.7 d, 8.5 ± 2.1 d, 10.9 ± 3.1 d, respectively) (p < 0.05). In the delayed ERCP group, the average hospitalization time (18.6 ± 4.1 d) and ALT recovery time (12.2 ± 2.6 d) were lower than in the delayed PTCD group (21.9 ± 4.3 d and 14.9 ± 3.9 d, respectively) (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: ERCP and PTCD effectively relieve SABP-associated biliary obstruction with comparable overall incidence of complications. It is recommended that ERCP is performed within 72 h after diagnosis; and PTCD drainage may be considered an alternative approach in cases where patients are unable or unwilling to undergo ERCP, or when ERCP is unsuccessful.

Relevance for patients: ERCP and PTCD in patients with obstructive SABP can resolve biliary obstruction and delay progression of the disease. Performing ERCP and PTCD within 72 h (i.e., optimal treatment time window) can be beneficial to patients, especially in terms of post-operative recovery. Visual biliary endoscopy (oral or percutaneous transhepatic) may be used for concomitant therapeutic interventions in the biliary system.

Abstract Image

早期和延迟内镜逆行胰胆管造影及经皮经肝胆管引流治疗梗阻性重症急性胆源性胰腺炎的疗效。
背景:梗阻性严重急性胆道性胰腺炎(SABP)是一种死亡率高的临床急症,可通过内镜逆行胆管造影术(ERCP)和选择性经皮经肝胆管引流术(PTCD)缓解。然而,ERCP和PTCD的最佳时机需要阐明。目的:本研究的目的是评估接受ERCP和PTCD的SABP患者与未接受任何形式侵入性干预的SABP患者的结局参数。方法:将2013年7月至2019年7月收治的62例阻塞性SABP患者纳入回顾性病例对照研究,分为PTCD组(N = 22)、ERCP组(N = 24)和保守治疗组(N = 16,对照组)。根据诊断后干预时间将PTCD组和ERCP组患者分为早期(≤72 h)和延迟(>72 h)治疗组。通过测定临床化学、住院天数、肝功能、腹痛、并发症等指标,评估两种治疗方式的疗效和安全性,确定PTCD和ERCP的最佳时机。结果:PTCD组和ERCP组患者平均住院时间、腹痛缓解时间、血液学及临床化学指标(白细胞计数、淀粉酶、丙氨酸转氨酶、总胆红素)恢复正常时间均短于保守治疗组(p < 0.05)。ERCP组平均住院时间(16.7±4.0 d)短于PTCD组(19.6±4.3 d) (p < 0.05)。与保守治疗组(62.5%)相比,ERCP和PTCD治疗组并发症发生率更高(p < 0.05)。早期ERCP组平均住院时间(13.9±3.3 d)、白细胞计数(6.3±0.9 d)、TBiL(9.1±2.0 d)均低于延迟ERCP组(18.6±4.1 d、9.9±2.4 d、11.8±2.9 d)和早期PTCD组(16.4±3.7 d、8.5±2.1 d、10.9±3.1 d) (p < 0.05)。延迟ERCP组平均住院时间(18.6±4.1 d)和ALT恢复时间(12.2±2.6 d)低于延迟PTCD组(21.9±4.3 d和14.9±3.9 d) (p < 0.05)。结论:ERCP和PTCD可有效缓解sabp相关性胆道梗阻,且总并发症发生率相当。建议在诊断后72小时内行ERCP;在患者不能或不愿接受ERCP或ERCP不成功的情况下,PTCD引流可被视为一种替代方法。与患者的相关性:梗阻性SABP患者的ERCP和PTCD可以解决胆道阻塞并延缓疾病进展。在72小时内(即最佳治疗时间窗口)进行ERCP和PTCD对患者有益,特别是在术后恢复方面。胆道内窥镜检查(口服或经皮经肝)可用于胆道系统的联合治疗干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信