The emotionally exhausted treating the mentally unwell? A systematic review of burnout and stress interventions for psychologists

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Caitlin Bell, Genevieve L. R. Roberts, Prudence M. Millear, Andrew Allen, Andrew P. Wood, Lee Kannis-Dymand, Celine M. Jona, Jonathan Mason
{"title":"The emotionally exhausted treating the mentally unwell? A systematic review of burnout and stress interventions for psychologists","authors":"Caitlin Bell,&nbsp;Genevieve L. R. Roberts,&nbsp;Prudence M. Millear,&nbsp;Andrew Allen,&nbsp;Andrew P. Wood,&nbsp;Lee Kannis-Dymand,&nbsp;Celine M. Jona,&nbsp;Jonathan Mason","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Healthcare providers are at high risk of occupational burnout, which has negative implications on the individual, their profession, the organisation and their patients. Psychologists are particularly susceptible to the repercussions of burnout due to the emotionally draining nature and content of their work. However, research has failed to outline and evaluate effective interventions for burnout within the profession. This study aimed to investigate the treatment effectiveness of burnout through a systematic literature review. Systematic searches of four databases using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were conducted. A total of 4832 articles were identified, and 15 were included in the final analysis. The search was limited to scholarly and peer-reviewed journals published in the English language, which measured and utilised a form of intervention for the treatment of burnout or stress and included participants within the psychology profession. Interventions identified included mindfulness, training courses, self-care and other therapy-based forms of interventions. Approximately 60% of study participants reported moderate to high levels of stress. Interventions were largely variable in modality, frequency and duration of sessions and follow-up period. Of the 15 studies included within the review, only four measured burnout as an outcome variable, while the others measured stress. Findings of this systematic review indicate that mindfulness-based interventions may be a starting point for reducing stress; however, the most effective intervention for psychologists who have reached burnout is largely unclear. It is recommended that future studies focus on the identification and measurement of burnout, are more rigorously designed and reported and consider peer-based online support approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare providers are at high risk of occupational burnout, which has negative implications on the individual, their profession, the organisation and their patients. Psychologists are particularly susceptible to the repercussions of burnout due to the emotionally draining nature and content of their work. However, research has failed to outline and evaluate effective interventions for burnout within the profession. This study aimed to investigate the treatment effectiveness of burnout through a systematic literature review. Systematic searches of four databases using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were conducted. A total of 4832 articles were identified, and 15 were included in the final analysis. The search was limited to scholarly and peer-reviewed journals published in the English language, which measured and utilised a form of intervention for the treatment of burnout or stress and included participants within the psychology profession. Interventions identified included mindfulness, training courses, self-care and other therapy-based forms of interventions. Approximately 60% of study participants reported moderate to high levels of stress. Interventions were largely variable in modality, frequency and duration of sessions and follow-up period. Of the 15 studies included within the review, only four measured burnout as an outcome variable, while the others measured stress. Findings of this systematic review indicate that mindfulness-based interventions may be a starting point for reducing stress; however, the most effective intervention for psychologists who have reached burnout is largely unclear. It is recommended that future studies focus on the identification and measurement of burnout, are more rigorously designed and reported and consider peer-based online support approaches.

精神疲惫者治疗精神不健康者?对心理学家职业倦怠和压力干预措施的系统回顾
医疗服务提供者面临职业倦怠的高风险,这对个人、职业、组织和患者都会产生负面影响。心理学家由于其工作性质和内容耗费情绪,尤其容易受到职业倦怠的影响。然而,研究却未能概述和评估针对该行业职业倦怠的有效干预措施。本研究旨在通过系统的文献综述来调查职业倦怠的治疗效果。研究采用系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南对四个数据库进行了系统检索。共发现 4832 篇文章,其中 15 篇被纳入最终分析。搜索仅限于以英语出版的学术性同行评审期刊,这些期刊衡量并使用了某种形式的干预措施来治疗职业倦怠或压力,并包括心理学专业的参与者。所确定的干预措施包括正念、培训课程、自我保健和其他基于治疗的干预形式。约有 60% 的研究参与者表示有中度到高度的压力。干预的方式、频率、疗程和随访时间各不相同。在纳入综述的 15 项研究中,只有 4 项研究将职业倦怠作为结果变量进行了测量,而其他研究则对压力进行了测量。本系统综述的研究结果表明,以正念为基础的干预措施可能是减轻压力的一个起点;但是,对于已经达到职业倦怠的心理学家来说,最有效的干预措施在很大程度上还不明确。建议今后的研究重点关注职业倦怠的识别和测量,进行更严格的设计和报告,并考虑基于同伴的在线支持方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信