Perceptions of social media utilization among orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Mehdi S Salimy, Ankur S Narain, Patrick B Curtin, Eric C Bellinger, Abhay R Patel
{"title":"Perceptions of social media utilization among orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons.","authors":"Mehdi S Salimy, Ankur S Narain, Patrick B Curtin, Eric C Bellinger, Abhay R Patel","doi":"10.1186/s13047-023-00658-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing social media presence in healthcare has provided physicians with new ways to engage with patients. However, foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons have been found to underuse social media platforms despite their known benefits for patients and surgeons. Thus, this study sought to investigate the reasons for this phenomenon and to identify potential barriers to social media utilization in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 19-question survey was distributed to active attending physicians identified through the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society membership database. The survey included demographic, practice characteristics, and social media use questions assessed by a 5-point Likert scale. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of positive attitudes toward social media.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight surgeons were included. Most respondents were male (n = 43, 74.1%), in private practice (n = 31, 53.5%), and described their practice to be greater than 51% elective procedures (n = 46, 79.4%). The average years in practice was 14.8 years (standard deviation, SD: 10.0 years). A total of 32.8% (n = 19) of surgeons reported using social media as part of their clinical practice. Facebook (n = 19, 32.8%), a professional website or blog (n = 18, 31.0%), and LinkedIn (n = 15, 25.9%) were the most used platforms-primarily for practice marketing or brand development (n = 19, 32.8%). A total of 58.6% (n = 34) of surgeons reported they did not use social media. The primary reasons were the time commitment (n = 31, 53.5%), concerns about obscuring professional boundaries (n = 22, 37.9%), and concerns regarding confidentiality (n = 11, 19.0%). Many surgeons reported that social media positively influences foot and ankle surgery (n = 23, 39.7%), although no individual predictors for these views could be identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons tended to view social media use positively, but the time investment and concerns over professionalism and confidentiality pose challenges to its use. Given the influence of a surgeon's social media identity on patient satisfaction and practice building, efforts should be made to streamline social media use for foot and ankle surgeons to establish their online presence.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, cross-sectional study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00658-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growing social media presence in healthcare has provided physicians with new ways to engage with patients. However, foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons have been found to underuse social media platforms despite their known benefits for patients and surgeons. Thus, this study sought to investigate the reasons for this phenomenon and to identify potential barriers to social media utilization in clinical practice.

Methods: A 19-question survey was distributed to active attending physicians identified through the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society membership database. The survey included demographic, practice characteristics, and social media use questions assessed by a 5-point Likert scale. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of positive attitudes toward social media.

Results: Fifty-eight surgeons were included. Most respondents were male (n = 43, 74.1%), in private practice (n = 31, 53.5%), and described their practice to be greater than 51% elective procedures (n = 46, 79.4%). The average years in practice was 14.8 years (standard deviation, SD: 10.0 years). A total of 32.8% (n = 19) of surgeons reported using social media as part of their clinical practice. Facebook (n = 19, 32.8%), a professional website or blog (n = 18, 31.0%), and LinkedIn (n = 15, 25.9%) were the most used platforms-primarily for practice marketing or brand development (n = 19, 32.8%). A total of 58.6% (n = 34) of surgeons reported they did not use social media. The primary reasons were the time commitment (n = 31, 53.5%), concerns about obscuring professional boundaries (n = 22, 37.9%), and concerns regarding confidentiality (n = 11, 19.0%). Many surgeons reported that social media positively influences foot and ankle surgery (n = 23, 39.7%), although no individual predictors for these views could be identified.

Conclusions: Foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons tended to view social media use positively, but the time investment and concerns over professionalism and confidentiality pose challenges to its use. Given the influence of a surgeon's social media identity on patient satisfaction and practice building, efforts should be made to streamline social media use for foot and ankle surgeons to establish their online presence.

Level of evidence: Level IV, cross-sectional study.

骨科足和踝关节外科医生对社交媒体使用的看法。
背景:越来越多的社交媒体出现在医疗保健领域,为医生提供了与患者互动的新方式。然而,足部和踝关节整形外科医生被发现没有充分利用社交媒体平台,尽管社交媒体平台对患者和外科医生都有好处。因此,本研究试图调查这一现象的原因,并确定在临床实践中使用社交媒体的潜在障碍。方法:通过美国骨科足踝协会会员数据库向活跃的主治医生分发19个问题的调查。该调查包括人口统计、实践特征和社交媒体使用问题,采用5分李克特量表进行评估。采用逻辑回归来确定对社交媒体的积极态度的预测因素。结果:纳入58名外科医生。大多数受访者为男性(n = 43, 74.1%),在私人执业(n = 31, 53.5%),并描述他们的执业超过51%的选择性手术(n = 46, 79.4%)。平均执业年数14.8年(标准差:10.0年)。共有32.8% (n = 19)的外科医生报告将社交媒体作为其临床实践的一部分。Facebook (n = 19, 32.8%)、专业网站或博客(n = 18, 31.0%)和LinkedIn (n = 15, 25.9%)是最常用的平台,主要用于实践营销或品牌发展(n = 19, 32.8%)。共有58.6% (n = 34)的外科医生报告他们不使用社交媒体。主要原因是时间投入(n = 31, 53.5%),对模糊专业界限的担忧(n = 22, 37.9%)和对机密性的担忧(n = 11, 19.0%)。许多外科医生报告说,社交媒体对足部和踝关节手术有积极影响(n = 23, 39.7%),尽管无法确定这些观点的个体预测因素。结论:足踝关节骨科医生倾向于积极看待社交媒体的使用,但时间投入以及对专业性和保密性的担忧对其使用构成挑战。鉴于外科医生的社交媒体身份对患者满意度和实践建设的影响,应该努力简化足部和踝关节外科医生在社交媒体上的使用,以建立他们的在线形象。证据等级:四级,横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信