Implementing Peer Specialists in Suicide Prevention Efforts in the Veterans Health Administration.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatric Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s11126-023-10034-x
Timothy Schmutte, Lauren S Krishnamurti, Larry Davidson, Anne Klee, Joshua Bullock, Raymond M Panas, Paul N Pfeiffer, Matthew Chinman
{"title":"Implementing Peer Specialists in Suicide Prevention Efforts in the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Timothy Schmutte, Lauren S Krishnamurti, Larry Davidson, Anne Klee, Joshua Bullock, Raymond M Panas, Paul N Pfeiffer, Matthew Chinman","doi":"10.1007/s11126-023-10034-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) recognizes peer support as an underused intervention in suicide prevention. PREVAIL is a peer-based suicide prevention intervention that was designed and piloted with non-veteran patients recently hospitalized for suicidal thoughts or behaviors. The purpose of this study was to elicit veteran and stakeholder feedback to inform the adaptation of PREVAIL for piloting with veterans flagged for high suicide risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with multiple stakeholders from a VHA medical center in the northeast. Interviews focused on the perceived benefits and concerns of peer specialists directly addressing suicide risk with veterans. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviewees included clinical directors (n = 3), suicide prevention coordinators (n = 1), outpatient psychologists (n = 2), peer specialists (n = 1), and high-risk veterans (n = 2). Overall, peer specialists were viewed as possessing many distinct strengths in engaging and helping high-risk veterans as part of a team approach. Concerns included liability, adequate training, clinical supervision and support, and self-care for peer specialists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicated support and confidence that peer support specialists would be a valuable addition and could help fill existing gap in VHA's suicide prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":"94 2","pages":"311-319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10424796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-023-10034-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) recognizes peer support as an underused intervention in suicide prevention. PREVAIL is a peer-based suicide prevention intervention that was designed and piloted with non-veteran patients recently hospitalized for suicidal thoughts or behaviors. The purpose of this study was to elicit veteran and stakeholder feedback to inform the adaptation of PREVAIL for piloting with veterans flagged for high suicide risk.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with multiple stakeholders from a VHA medical center in the northeast. Interviews focused on the perceived benefits and concerns of peer specialists directly addressing suicide risk with veterans. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis.

Results: Interviewees included clinical directors (n = 3), suicide prevention coordinators (n = 1), outpatient psychologists (n = 2), peer specialists (n = 1), and high-risk veterans (n = 2). Overall, peer specialists were viewed as possessing many distinct strengths in engaging and helping high-risk veterans as part of a team approach. Concerns included liability, adequate training, clinical supervision and support, and self-care for peer specialists.

Conclusions: Findings indicated support and confidence that peer support specialists would be a valuable addition and could help fill existing gap in VHA's suicide prevention efforts.

在退伍军人健康管理局的自杀预防工作中引入同伴专家。
目的:退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)认为同伴支持是一种未被充分利用的自杀预防干预措施。PREVAIL 是一种基于同伴的自杀预防干预措施,其设计和试点对象是最近因自杀想法或行为住院的非退伍军人患者。本研究旨在征求退伍军人和利益相关者的反馈意见,以便对 PREVAIL 进行调整,在标注为高自杀风险的退伍军人中进行试点:方法:对东北部一家退伍军人事务部医疗中心的多位利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。访谈的重点是同伴专家直接处理退伍军人自杀风险问题所带来的益处和顾虑。访谈采用快速定性分析法进行记录、转录和分析:受访者包括临床主任(n = 3)、自杀预防协调员(n = 1)、门诊心理学家(n = 2)、同伴专家(n = 1)和高危退伍军人(n = 2)。总体而言,同伴专家被认为在作为团队方法的一部分参与和帮助高风险退伍军人方面具有许多独特的优势。关注的问题包括同伴专家的责任、充分的培训、临床监督和支持以及自我保健:研究结果表明,人们支持并相信同伴支持专家将是一个有价值的补充,有助于填补退伍军人事务部预防自杀工作中的现有空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信