Biochemical markers of iron status and iron accumulation in peritoneal dialysis patients treated with ferric citrate.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Peritoneal Dialysis International Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-10 DOI:10.1177/08968608231197361
José E Navarrete, Oyintayo Ajiboye, Janice I Lea
{"title":"Biochemical markers of iron status and iron accumulation in peritoneal dialysis patients treated with ferric citrate.","authors":"José E Navarrete, Oyintayo Ajiboye, Janice I Lea","doi":"10.1177/08968608231197361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperphosphataemia is a common complication of kidney disease. Current dialysis techniques do not provide enough phosphorus clearance, hence the need to use phosphorus binders. Treatment options include calcium carbonate, calcium acetate, lanthanum carbonate, sevelamer hydrochloride and iron-based binders. Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) with sustained elevated ferritin levels exceeding 800 ng/mL are at a higher risk of death. We identify PD patients treated with iron-based binders and compare ferritin and risk of iron accumulation to patients treated with non-iron-based binders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All records of patients receiving PD at Emory dialysis centres until 30 October 2021 were reviewed for phosphorus binders. Basic demographics and laboratory data were time-referenced to the days on treatment with a particular binder. Patients were followed until discontinuation of the phosphorus binder, death, transplant, transfer to another dialysis provider or censoring at 36 months after medication was started.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to calcium acetate and sevelamer, ferric citrate utilisation in PD patients resulted in a sustained increase in ferritin. The proportion of patients with a ferritin equal to or greater than 800 ng/dL and transferrin saturation greater than 40% increased over time in patients treated with ferric citrate and was higher during the second and third year of follow-up compared to baseline values and to patients treated with calcium acetate or sevelamer. Two patients (7%) treated with ferric citrate developed clinically significant haemosiderosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of ferric citrated in PD resulted in significant iron accumulation as judged by ferritin levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":" ","pages":"133-140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608231197361","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hyperphosphataemia is a common complication of kidney disease. Current dialysis techniques do not provide enough phosphorus clearance, hence the need to use phosphorus binders. Treatment options include calcium carbonate, calcium acetate, lanthanum carbonate, sevelamer hydrochloride and iron-based binders. Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) with sustained elevated ferritin levels exceeding 800 ng/mL are at a higher risk of death. We identify PD patients treated with iron-based binders and compare ferritin and risk of iron accumulation to patients treated with non-iron-based binders.

Methods: All records of patients receiving PD at Emory dialysis centres until 30 October 2021 were reviewed for phosphorus binders. Basic demographics and laboratory data were time-referenced to the days on treatment with a particular binder. Patients were followed until discontinuation of the phosphorus binder, death, transplant, transfer to another dialysis provider or censoring at 36 months after medication was started.

Results: Compared to calcium acetate and sevelamer, ferric citrate utilisation in PD patients resulted in a sustained increase in ferritin. The proportion of patients with a ferritin equal to or greater than 800 ng/dL and transferrin saturation greater than 40% increased over time in patients treated with ferric citrate and was higher during the second and third year of follow-up compared to baseline values and to patients treated with calcium acetate or sevelamer. Two patients (7%) treated with ferric citrate developed clinically significant haemosiderosis.

Conclusions: Use of ferric citrated in PD resulted in significant iron accumulation as judged by ferritin levels.

使用枸橼酸铁治疗腹膜透析患者铁状态和铁蓄积的生化指标。
背景:高磷血症是肾病的常见并发症。目前的透析技术无法提供足够的磷清除率,因此需要使用磷结合剂。治疗方法包括碳酸钙、醋酸钙、碳酸镧、盐酸司维拉姆和铁基结合剂。接受腹膜透析(PD)且铁蛋白水平持续升高超过 800 纳克/毫升的患者死亡风险较高。我们确定了接受铁基结合剂治疗的腹膜透析患者,并将铁蛋白和铁累积风险与接受非铁基结合剂治疗的患者进行了比较:我们查阅了截至 2021 年 10 月 30 日埃默里透析中心所有接受磷结合剂治疗的腹膜透析患者的记录。将基本人口统计学和实验室数据与使用特定粘合剂治疗的天数进行时间参照。对患者进行随访,直至停用磷结合剂、死亡、移植、转到另一家透析机构或在开始用药后36个月进行普查:结果:与醋酸钙和司维拉莫相比,PD 患者使用枸橼酸铁可使铁蛋白持续增加。在接受枸橼酸铁治疗的患者中,铁蛋白大于或等于800 ng/dL且转铁蛋白饱和度大于40%的患者比例随着时间的推移而增加,与基线值以及接受醋酸钙或司维拉莫治疗的患者相比,在随访的第二年和第三年中,铁蛋白大于或等于800 ng/dL且转铁蛋白饱和度大于40%的患者比例更高。两名接受枸橼酸铁治疗的患者(7%)出现了临床上明显的血色素沉着症:结论:根据铁蛋白水平判断,在腹膜透析患者中使用枸橼酸铁会导致严重的铁蓄积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信