Examining reciprocal relations between disgust proneness and OCD symptoms: A four-wave longitudinal study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Bunmi O. Olatunji , Jingu Kim
{"title":"Examining reciprocal relations between disgust proneness and OCD symptoms: A four-wave longitudinal study","authors":"Bunmi O. Olatunji ,&nbsp;Jingu Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Although disgust proneness has been implicated in the development of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), available studies have largely employed cross-sectional designs and the prospective and potentially reciprocal association between disgust proneness and OCD symptoms remains unclear. The present study employs cross lagged panel analysis to examine the prospective and reciprocal association between disgust proneness and OCD symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A community sample of adults (<em>N</em> = 307) completed symptom measures of disgust proneness and OCD symptoms at four time points with 1 month intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed that the cross-lagged paths from disgust proneness to OCD symptoms were significant (average <em>β =</em> 0.07, <em>p'</em>s &lt; 0.001) when controlling for depression. However, the paths from total OCD symptoms to disgust proneness were not significant. In contrast, the cross-lagged paths from disgust proneness to washing OCD symptoms were not significant. However, the paths from washing OCD symptoms to disgust proneness were significant (average <em>β =</em> 0.05, <em>p'</em>s &lt; 0.01) when controlling for depression.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The study is limited is limited by exclusive reliance on self-report in a nonclinical sample.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings offer preliminary evidence suggesting that disgust proneness may be a cause and consequence of OCD depending on the nature of the symptoms. Thus, the longitudinal relation between disgust proneness and OCD may be transactional where one influences the effect of the other.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 101907"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791623000745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Although disgust proneness has been implicated in the development of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), available studies have largely employed cross-sectional designs and the prospective and potentially reciprocal association between disgust proneness and OCD symptoms remains unclear. The present study employs cross lagged panel analysis to examine the prospective and reciprocal association between disgust proneness and OCD symptoms.

Method

A community sample of adults (N = 307) completed symptom measures of disgust proneness and OCD symptoms at four time points with 1 month intervals.

Results

The results showed that the cross-lagged paths from disgust proneness to OCD symptoms were significant (average β = 0.07, p's < 0.001) when controlling for depression. However, the paths from total OCD symptoms to disgust proneness were not significant. In contrast, the cross-lagged paths from disgust proneness to washing OCD symptoms were not significant. However, the paths from washing OCD symptoms to disgust proneness were significant (average β = 0.05, p's < 0.01) when controlling for depression.

Limitations

The study is limited is limited by exclusive reliance on self-report in a nonclinical sample.

Conclusions

The findings offer preliminary evidence suggesting that disgust proneness may be a cause and consequence of OCD depending on the nature of the symptoms. Thus, the longitudinal relation between disgust proneness and OCD may be transactional where one influences the effect of the other.

研究厌恶倾向和强迫症症状之间的相互关系:一项四波纵向研究
背景和目的虽然厌恶倾向与强迫症(OCD)的发展有关,但现有的研究大多采用横断面设计,厌恶倾向与强迫症症状之间的前瞻性和潜在的相互关联尚不清楚。本研究采用交叉滞后面板分析来检验厌恶倾向与强迫症症状之间的前瞻性和反向关联。方法社区抽样成人307例,分别在4个时间点完成厌恶倾向和强迫症症状测量,时间间隔为1个月。结果厌恶倾向到强迫症症状的交叉滞后路径显著(平均β = 0.07, p's <0.001)。然而,从完全的强迫症症状到厌恶倾向的路径并不显著。相反,从厌恶倾向到洗涤强迫症症状的交叉滞后路径不显著。然而,从洗涤强迫症症状到厌恶倾向的路径是显著的(平均β = 0.05, p's <0.01)。局限性:本研究的局限性在于完全依赖于非临床样本的自我报告。这些发现提供了初步证据,表明厌恶倾向可能是强迫症的原因和结果,这取决于症状的性质。因此,厌恶倾向和强迫症之间的纵向关系可能是事务性的,其中一个影响另一个的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信