Perspectives on Alternative Models of Medication Abortion Provision Among Abortion Patients in the United States

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Katherine Ehrenreich MSc, C. Finley Baba MPH, Sarah Raifman MSc, Daniel Grossman MD
{"title":"Perspectives on Alternative Models of Medication Abortion Provision Among Abortion Patients in the United States","authors":"Katherine Ehrenreich MSc,&nbsp;C. Finley Baba MPH,&nbsp;Sarah Raifman MSc,&nbsp;Daniel Grossman MD","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Restrictions on the availability of medication abortion are a barrier to accessing early abortion. People seeking medication abortion may be interested in obtaining the medications through alternative models. The purpose of this study was to explore patient perspectives on obtaining abortion medications in advance of pregnancy or over the counter (OTC).</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Between October 2017 and August 2018, we conducted 30 in-depth interviews with abortion patients who indicated support for alternative models. We recruited patients from 10 abortion clinics in states with a range of policy environments. We analyzed interviews using inductive and deductive iterative techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants identified logistical benefits of these alternative models, including eliminating travel to a clinic and multiple appointments, and increased privacy around decision-making. Participants were interested in advance provision for its convenience and the sense of preparedness that would come with having the pills available at home, yet some had concerns about the pills being found or stolen. Privacy was the key factor considered for OTC access, including both the privacy benefits of avoiding a clinic and the concern of having one's privacy compromised within the community if purchasing the medications in public.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>People who have previously had a medication abortion are interested in alternative methods of provision for reasons concerning convenience, privacy, and avoiding burdens related to hostile policy environments, such as long travel distances to clinics and multiple appointments. Concerns around these models were primarily safety concerns for young people. Further research is needed to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of these alternative models of providing medication abortion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":"33 5","pages":"Pages 481-488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723000774","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Restrictions on the availability of medication abortion are a barrier to accessing early abortion. People seeking medication abortion may be interested in obtaining the medications through alternative models. The purpose of this study was to explore patient perspectives on obtaining abortion medications in advance of pregnancy or over the counter (OTC).

Study Design

Between October 2017 and August 2018, we conducted 30 in-depth interviews with abortion patients who indicated support for alternative models. We recruited patients from 10 abortion clinics in states with a range of policy environments. We analyzed interviews using inductive and deductive iterative techniques.

Results

Participants identified logistical benefits of these alternative models, including eliminating travel to a clinic and multiple appointments, and increased privacy around decision-making. Participants were interested in advance provision for its convenience and the sense of preparedness that would come with having the pills available at home, yet some had concerns about the pills being found or stolen. Privacy was the key factor considered for OTC access, including both the privacy benefits of avoiding a clinic and the concern of having one's privacy compromised within the community if purchasing the medications in public.

Conclusions

People who have previously had a medication abortion are interested in alternative methods of provision for reasons concerning convenience, privacy, and avoiding burdens related to hostile policy environments, such as long travel distances to clinics and multiple appointments. Concerns around these models were primarily safety concerns for young people. Further research is needed to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of these alternative models of providing medication abortion.

对美国堕胎患者药物流产替代模式的展望
对药物流产的限制是获得早期堕胎的障碍。寻求药物流产的人可能有兴趣通过替代模式获得药物。本研究的目的是探讨患者对在怀孕前或非处方药(OTC)获得堕胎药物的看法。研究设计在2017年10月至2018年8月期间,我们对表示支持替代模式的堕胎患者进行了30次深入访谈。我们从有各种政策环境的州的10家堕胎诊所招募了患者。我们使用归纳和演绎迭代技术分析访谈。结果参与者确定了这些替代模式的后勤效益,包括取消去诊所的旅行和多次预约,以及增加决策的隐私。参与者对提前供应感兴趣,因为它的方便性和在家里提供药片所带来的准备感,但一些人担心药片会被发现或被盗。隐私是非处方药使用的关键因素,包括避免去诊所的隐私好处,以及如果在公共场合购买药物,在社区内隐私受到损害的担忧。结论以前进行过药物流产的人出于方便、隐私和避免与敌对政策环境相关的负担的原因,如长途前往诊所和多次预约,对其他提供药物的方法感兴趣。对这些车型的担忧主要是年轻人的安全问题。需要进一步的研究来评估这些提供药物流产的替代模式的安全性、有效性、可接受性和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信