Understanding the Benefit-Cost Relationship in Long-standing Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: Findings from the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Laurie Lachance, Chris M Coombe, Barbara L Brush, Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee, Megan Jensen, Brianna Taffe, Prachi Bhardwaj, Michael Muhammad, Eliza Wilson-Powers, Zachary Rowe, Cleopatra H Caldwell, Barbara A Israel
{"title":"Understanding the Benefit-Cost Relationship in Long-standing Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: Findings from the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Study.","authors":"Laurie Lachance,&nbsp;Chris M Coombe,&nbsp;Barbara L Brush,&nbsp;Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee,&nbsp;Megan Jensen,&nbsp;Brianna Taffe,&nbsp;Prachi Bhardwaj,&nbsp;Michael Muhammad,&nbsp;Eliza Wilson-Powers,&nbsp;Zachary Rowe,&nbsp;Cleopatra H Caldwell,&nbsp;Barbara A Israel","doi":"10.1177/0021886320972193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study, we investigated the relationship between benefits and costs of participation in long-standing community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships using social exchange theory as a theoretical framework. Three major findings were identified: (1) the concept of benefits and costs operating as a ratio, where individual benefits must outweigh costs for participation, applies to early stages of CBPR partnership formation; (2) as CBPR partnerships develop, the benefits and costs of participation include each other's needs and the needs of the group as a whole; and (3) there is a shift in the relationship of benefits and costs over time in long-standing CBPR partnerships, in which partners no longer think in terms of costs but rather investments that contribute to mutual benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0021886320972193","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320972193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

As part of the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study, we investigated the relationship between benefits and costs of participation in long-standing community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships using social exchange theory as a theoretical framework. Three major findings were identified: (1) the concept of benefits and costs operating as a ratio, where individual benefits must outweigh costs for participation, applies to early stages of CBPR partnership formation; (2) as CBPR partnerships develop, the benefits and costs of participation include each other's needs and the needs of the group as a whole; and (3) there is a shift in the relationship of benefits and costs over time in long-standing CBPR partnerships, in which partners no longer think in terms of costs but rather investments that contribute to mutual benefits.

长期社区参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系中的收益-成本关系:来自伙伴关系成功测量方法(MAPS)研究的结果。
作为伙伴关系成功测量方法(MAPS)研究的一部分,我们以社会交换理论为理论框架,研究了长期社区参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系中参与的收益和成本之间的关系。研究发现了三个主要发现:(1)收益和成本作为一个比率运作的概念,即个人收益必须大于参与成本,适用于CBPR伙伴关系形成的早期阶段;(2)随着CBPR伙伴关系的发展,参与的收益和成本包括彼此的需求和整个群体的需求;(3)随着时间的推移,长期CBPR合作伙伴关系的收益和成本关系发生了变化,合作伙伴不再考虑成本,而是考虑有助于互惠互利的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信