Lydia Fortea, Alexander T. Ysbæk-Nielsen, Julian Macoveanu, Jeff Zarp Petersen, Patrick M. Fisher, Lars V. Kessing, Gitte M. Knudsen, Joaquim Radua, Eduard Vieta, Kamilla W. Miskowiak
{"title":"Aberrant resting-state functional connectivity underlies cognitive and functional impairments in remitted patients with bipolar disorder","authors":"Lydia Fortea, Alexander T. Ysbæk-Nielsen, Julian Macoveanu, Jeff Zarp Petersen, Patrick M. Fisher, Lars V. Kessing, Gitte M. Knudsen, Joaquim Radua, Eduard Vieta, Kamilla W. Miskowiak","doi":"10.1111/acps.13615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Bipolar disorder (BD) is commonly associated with cognitive impairments, that directly contribute to patients' functional disability. However, there is no effective treatment targeting cognition in BD. A key reason for the lack of pro-cognitive interventions is the limited insight into the brain correlates of cognitive impairments in these patients. This is the first study investigating the resting-state neural underpinnings of cognitive impairments in different neurocognitive subgroups of patients with BD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with BD in full or partial remission and healthy controls (final sample of <i>n</i> = 144 and <i>n</i> = 50, respectively) underwent neuropsychological assessment and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. We classified the patients into cognitively impaired (<i>n</i> = 83) and cognitively normal (<i>n</i> = 61) subgroups using hierarchical cluster analysis of the four cognitive domains. We used independent component analysis (ICA) to investigate the differences between the neurocognitive subgroups and healthy controls in resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in the default mode network (DMN), executive central network (ECN), and frontoparietal network (FPN).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Cognitively impaired patients displayed greater positive rsFC within the DMN and less negative rsFC within the ECN than healthy controls. Across cognitively impaired patients, lower positive connectivity within DMN and lower negative rsFC within ECN correlated with worse global cognitive performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Cognitive impairments in BD seem to be associated with a <i>hyper</i>-connectivity within the DMN, which may explain the failure to suppress task-irrelevant DMN activity during the cognitive performance, and blunted anticorrelation in the ECN. Thus, aberrant connectivity within the DMN and ECN may serve as brain targets for pro-cognitive interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":"148 6","pages":"570-582"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acps.13615","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Bipolar disorder (BD) is commonly associated with cognitive impairments, that directly contribute to patients' functional disability. However, there is no effective treatment targeting cognition in BD. A key reason for the lack of pro-cognitive interventions is the limited insight into the brain correlates of cognitive impairments in these patients. This is the first study investigating the resting-state neural underpinnings of cognitive impairments in different neurocognitive subgroups of patients with BD.
Method
Patients with BD in full or partial remission and healthy controls (final sample of n = 144 and n = 50, respectively) underwent neuropsychological assessment and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. We classified the patients into cognitively impaired (n = 83) and cognitively normal (n = 61) subgroups using hierarchical cluster analysis of the four cognitive domains. We used independent component analysis (ICA) to investigate the differences between the neurocognitive subgroups and healthy controls in resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in the default mode network (DMN), executive central network (ECN), and frontoparietal network (FPN).
Results
Cognitively impaired patients displayed greater positive rsFC within the DMN and less negative rsFC within the ECN than healthy controls. Across cognitively impaired patients, lower positive connectivity within DMN and lower negative rsFC within ECN correlated with worse global cognitive performance.
Conclusion
Cognitive impairments in BD seem to be associated with a hyper-connectivity within the DMN, which may explain the failure to suppress task-irrelevant DMN activity during the cognitive performance, and blunted anticorrelation in the ECN. Thus, aberrant connectivity within the DMN and ECN may serve as brain targets for pro-cognitive interventions.
期刊介绍:
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.