Functional morphological integration related to feeding biomechanics in the hominine skull

IF 3.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Hyunwoo Jung , David Strait , Campbell Rolian , Karen L. Baab
{"title":"Functional morphological integration related to feeding biomechanics in the hominine skull","authors":"Hyunwoo Jung ,&nbsp;David Strait ,&nbsp;Campbell Rolian ,&nbsp;Karen L. Baab","doi":"10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantifying and characterizing the pattern of trait covariances is crucial for understanding how population-level patterns of integration might constrain or facilitate craniofacial evolution related to the feeding system. This study addresses an important gap in our knowledge by investigating magnitudes and patterns of morphological integration of biomechanically informative traits in the skulls of <span><em>Homo sapiens</em></span>, <span><em>Pan troglodytes</em></span>, and <em>Gorilla gorilla</em>. We predicted a lower magnitude of integration among human biomechanical traits since humans eat a softer, less biomechanically challenging diet than apes. Indeed, compared to African apes, the magnitudes of integration were lower in <em>H. sapiens</em><span> skulls for form data (raw dimensions) but were similar or higher for shape data (raw dimensions scaled by geometric mean). Patterns of morphological integration were generally similar, but not identical, across the three species, particularly for the form data compared to the shape data. Traits that load heavily on the primary axis of variation in morphospace are generally associated with size and/or shape of the temporalis and masseter muscles and with dimensions related to the constrained lever model of jaw biomechanics. Given the conserved nature of morphological integration, skull adaptations for food processing in African apes and humans may have been constrained to occur along certain paths of high evolvability. The conserved pattern of functional integration also indicates that extant hominine species can operate as reasonable analogues for extinct hominins in studies that require population-level patterns of trait variance/covariance.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Evolution","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 103401"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248423000805","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Quantifying and characterizing the pattern of trait covariances is crucial for understanding how population-level patterns of integration might constrain or facilitate craniofacial evolution related to the feeding system. This study addresses an important gap in our knowledge by investigating magnitudes and patterns of morphological integration of biomechanically informative traits in the skulls of Homo sapiens, Pan troglodytes, and Gorilla gorilla. We predicted a lower magnitude of integration among human biomechanical traits since humans eat a softer, less biomechanically challenging diet than apes. Indeed, compared to African apes, the magnitudes of integration were lower in H. sapiens skulls for form data (raw dimensions) but were similar or higher for shape data (raw dimensions scaled by geometric mean). Patterns of morphological integration were generally similar, but not identical, across the three species, particularly for the form data compared to the shape data. Traits that load heavily on the primary axis of variation in morphospace are generally associated with size and/or shape of the temporalis and masseter muscles and with dimensions related to the constrained lever model of jaw biomechanics. Given the conserved nature of morphological integration, skull adaptations for food processing in African apes and humans may have been constrained to occur along certain paths of high evolvability. The conserved pattern of functional integration also indicates that extant hominine species can operate as reasonable analogues for extinct hominins in studies that require population-level patterns of trait variance/covariance.

与人类颅骨进食生物力学相关的功能形态整合
量化和描述性状协方差的模式对于理解种群水平的整合模式如何约束或促进与喂养系统相关的颅面进化至关重要。本研究通过调查智人、泛类人猿和大猩猩头骨中生物力学信息特征的形态整合的大小和模式,解决了我们知识上的一个重要空白。我们预测人类生物力学特征之间的整合程度较低,因为人类吃的食物比类人猿更柔软,对生物力学的挑战更小。的确,与非洲猿类相比,智人头骨的形状数据(原始尺寸)的整合程度较低,但形状数据(按几何平均值缩放的原始尺寸)的整合程度相似或更高。形态整合的模式大致相似,但不完全相同,特别是形态数据与形状数据的比较。在形态空间变异的主轴上负荷较大的特征通常与颞肌和咬肌的大小和/或形状以及与颌骨生物力学受限杠杆模型相关的尺寸有关。考虑到形态整合的保守性,非洲猿和人类的头骨对食物加工的适应可能受到限制,只能沿着某些高进化路径发生。功能整合的保守模式也表明,在需要种群水平性状方差/协方差模式的研究中,现存人类物种可以作为已灭绝人类的合理类似物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Human Evolution
Journal of Human Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Evolution concentrates on publishing the highest quality papers covering all aspects of human evolution. The central focus is aimed jointly at paleoanthropological work, covering human and primate fossils, and at comparative studies of living species, including both morphological and molecular evidence. These include descriptions of new discoveries, interpretative analyses of new and previously described material, and assessments of the phylogeny and paleobiology of primate species. Submissions should address issues and questions of broad interest in paleoanthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信