What We Know and Need to Know about Literacy Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties and Disabilities, including Dyslexia.

IF 3.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Reading Research Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-12 DOI:10.1002/rrq.458
Stephanie Al Otaiba, Kristen McMaster, Jeanne Wanzek, Mai W Zaru
{"title":"What We Know and Need to Know about Literacy Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties and Disabilities, including Dyslexia.","authors":"Stephanie Al Otaiba, Kristen McMaster, Jeanne Wanzek, Mai W Zaru","doi":"10.1002/rrq.458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to describe what we know and what we still need to learn about literacy intervention for children who experience significant difficulties learning to read. We reviewed 14 meta-analyses and systematic reviews of experimental and quasi-experimental studies published in the last decade that examined the effects of reading and writing interventions in the elementary grades, including research focused on students with reading difficulties and disabilities, including dyslexia. We attended to moderator analyses, when available, to further refine what we know and need to learn about interventions. Findings from these reviews indicate that explicit and systematic intervention focusing on the code <i>and</i> meaning dimensions of reading and writing, and delivered one-to-one or in small groups, are likely to improve foundational code-based reading skills, and to a lesser extent, meaning-based skills, across elementary grade levels. Findings, at least in the upper elementary grades, indicate that some intervention features including standardized protocols, multiple components, and longer duration can yield stronger effects. And, integrating reading and writing interventions shows promise. We still need to learn more about specific instructional routines and components that provide more robust effects on students' ability to comprehend and individual differences in response to interventions. We discuss limitations of this review of reviews and suggest directions for future research to optimize implementation, particularly to understand <i>for whom</i> and <i>under what conditions</i> literacy interventions work best.</p>","PeriodicalId":48160,"journal":{"name":"Reading Research Quarterly","volume":"58 2","pages":"313-332"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.458","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe what we know and what we still need to learn about literacy intervention for children who experience significant difficulties learning to read. We reviewed 14 meta-analyses and systematic reviews of experimental and quasi-experimental studies published in the last decade that examined the effects of reading and writing interventions in the elementary grades, including research focused on students with reading difficulties and disabilities, including dyslexia. We attended to moderator analyses, when available, to further refine what we know and need to learn about interventions. Findings from these reviews indicate that explicit and systematic intervention focusing on the code and meaning dimensions of reading and writing, and delivered one-to-one or in small groups, are likely to improve foundational code-based reading skills, and to a lesser extent, meaning-based skills, across elementary grade levels. Findings, at least in the upper elementary grades, indicate that some intervention features including standardized protocols, multiple components, and longer duration can yield stronger effects. And, integrating reading and writing interventions shows promise. We still need to learn more about specific instructional routines and components that provide more robust effects on students' ability to comprehend and individual differences in response to interventions. We discuss limitations of this review of reviews and suggest directions for future research to optimize implementation, particularly to understand for whom and under what conditions literacy interventions work best.

我们对阅读困难和残疾(包括阅读障碍)小学生识字干预的了解和需要了解。
本文的目的是描述我们对学习阅读遇到重大困难的儿童的识字干预的了解和需要了解的内容。我们回顾了过去十年中发表的14项荟萃分析和实验和准实验研究的系统综述,这些研究考察了阅读和写作干预对小学年级的影响,包括针对有阅读困难和残疾(包括阅读障碍)的学生的研究。我们参加了主持人分析(如有),以进一步完善我们对干预措施的了解和需要了解的内容。这些综述的结果表明,专注于阅读和写作的代码和意义维度的明确和系统的干预,一对一或小组进行,可能会提高基础的基于代码的阅读技能,并在较小程度上提高小学各年级的基于意义的技能。至少在小学高年级的研究结果表明,一些干预特征,包括标准化方案、多个组成部分和更长的持续时间,可以产生更强的效果。而且,将阅读和写作干预结合起来显示出希望。我们仍然需要更多地了解具体的教学程序和组成部分,这些程序和组成对学生的理解能力和对干预措施的个体差异产生更有力的影响。我们讨论了这篇综述的局限性,并为未来的研究提出了优化实施的方向,特别是了解扫盲干预措施对谁以及在什么条件下最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: For more than 40 years, Reading Research Quarterly has been essential reading for those committed to scholarship on literacy among learners of all ages. The leading research journal in the field, each issue of RRQ includes •Reports of important studies •Multidisciplinary research •Various modes of investigation •Diverse viewpoints on literacy practices, teaching, and learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信