Meta-analysis of the effects of adjuvant drugs in co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorder

0 PSYCHIATRY
Joaquim Radua , Lydia Fortea , José Manuel Goikolea , Iñaki Zorrilla , Miquel Bernardo , Manuel Arrojo , Ruth Cunill , Xavi Castells , Elisardo Becoña , Ana López-Durán , Marta Torrens , Judit Tirado-Muñoz , Francina Fonseca , Belén Arranz , Marina Garriga , Pilar A. Sáiz , Gerardo Flórez , Luis San , Ana González-Pinto
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the effects of adjuvant drugs in co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorder","authors":"Joaquim Radua ,&nbsp;Lydia Fortea ,&nbsp;José Manuel Goikolea ,&nbsp;Iñaki Zorrilla ,&nbsp;Miquel Bernardo ,&nbsp;Manuel Arrojo ,&nbsp;Ruth Cunill ,&nbsp;Xavi Castells ,&nbsp;Elisardo Becoña ,&nbsp;Ana López-Durán ,&nbsp;Marta Torrens ,&nbsp;Judit Tirado-Muñoz ,&nbsp;Francina Fonseca ,&nbsp;Belén Arranz ,&nbsp;Marina Garriga ,&nbsp;Pilar A. Sáiz ,&nbsp;Gerardo Flórez ,&nbsp;Luis San ,&nbsp;Ana González-Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsm.2023.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with bipolar disorder<span> (BD) often have co-occurring substance use disorders (SUDs), which substantially impoverish the course of illness. Despite the importance of this dual diagnosis, the evidence of the efficacy and safety of adjuvant treatments is mostly unknown.</span></div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant drugs in patients with co-occurring BD and SUD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge until 30th April 2022 for randomized clinical trials<span> (RCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of adjuvant drugs compared to placebo in patients with a dual diagnosis of BD and SUD. We meta-analyzed the effect of adjuvant drugs on general outcomes (illness severity, mania, depression, anxiety, abstinence, substance craving, substance use, gamma-GT, adherence, and adverse events) and used the results to objectively assess the quality of the evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. For completeness, we also report the specific effects of specific adjuvant drugs in patients with specific substance disorders.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 15 RCT studies (9 alcohol, 3 cocaine, 2 nicotine, and 1 cannabis) comprising 628 patients allocated to treatment and 622 to placebo. There was low-quality evidence that adjuvant drugs may reduce illness severity (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.25, 95% CI: −0.44, −0.06), and very-low quality evidence that they may decrease substance use (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.23, 95% CI: −0.44, −0.02) and increase substance abstinence (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.21, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.38).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There is low-quality evidence that adjuvant drugs may help reduce illness severity, probably via facilitating abstinence and lower substance use. However, the evidence is weak; thus, these results should be considered cautiously until better evidence exists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 239-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S188898912300006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) often have co-occurring substance use disorders (SUDs), which substantially impoverish the course of illness. Despite the importance of this dual diagnosis, the evidence of the efficacy and safety of adjuvant treatments is mostly unknown.

Objective

To perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant drugs in patients with co-occurring BD and SUD.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge until 30th April 2022 for randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of adjuvant drugs compared to placebo in patients with a dual diagnosis of BD and SUD. We meta-analyzed the effect of adjuvant drugs on general outcomes (illness severity, mania, depression, anxiety, abstinence, substance craving, substance use, gamma-GT, adherence, and adverse events) and used the results to objectively assess the quality of the evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. For completeness, we also report the specific effects of specific adjuvant drugs in patients with specific substance disorders.

Results

We included 15 RCT studies (9 alcohol, 3 cocaine, 2 nicotine, and 1 cannabis) comprising 628 patients allocated to treatment and 622 to placebo. There was low-quality evidence that adjuvant drugs may reduce illness severity (g = −0.25, 95% CI: −0.44, −0.06), and very-low quality evidence that they may decrease substance use (g = −0.23, 95% CI: −0.44, −0.02) and increase substance abstinence (g = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.38).

Discussion

There is low-quality evidence that adjuvant drugs may help reduce illness severity, probably via facilitating abstinence and lower substance use. However, the evidence is weak; thus, these results should be considered cautiously until better evidence exists.
辅助药物对双相情感障碍和药物使用障碍并发症的影响的元分析。
背景:双相情感障碍(BD)患者通常同时患有药物使用障碍(SUD),这严重影响了患者的病程。尽管这种双重诊断非常重要,但辅助治疗的疗效和安全性证据却大多不详:目的:进行一项荟萃分析,评估辅助药物对并发 BD 和 SUD 患者的疗效和安全性:截至2022年4月30日,我们在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Knowledge上检索了评估辅助药物与安慰剂相比对BD和SUD双重诊断患者疗效和安全性的随机临床试验(RCT)。我们对辅助药物对一般结果(疾病严重程度、躁狂、抑郁、焦虑、戒断、药物渴求、药物使用、γ-GT、依从性和不良事件)的影响进行了荟萃分析,并根据建议评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)对结果进行了客观的证据质量评估。为完整起见,我们还报告了特定辅助药物对特定药物紊乱患者的具体效果:我们纳入了 15 项 RCT 研究(9 项酒精研究、3 项可卡因研究、2 项尼古丁研究和 1 项大麻研究),其中 628 名患者接受了治疗,622 名患者接受了安慰剂治疗。低质量证据表明,辅助药物可降低疾病的严重程度(g=-0.25,95% CI:-0.44,-0.06),极低质量证据表明,辅助药物可减少药物使用(g=-0.23,95% CI:-0.44,-0.02)并提高药物戒断率(g=0.21,95% CI:0.04,0.38):有低质量的证据表明,辅助药物可能有助于降低疾病的严重程度,这可能是通过促进戒断和减少药物使用来实现的。然而,这些证据还很薄弱;因此,在有更好的证据之前,应谨慎考虑这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信