The Hoffmann parallax: a prospective study to determine the benefit of Hoffmann's sign.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2023-07-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.77875
Eric H Gruenberger, Sohrab K Vatsia, Rourke M Stay, Cameron Kersey, Mudassar A Khan, Douglas W Pahl
{"title":"The Hoffmann parallax: a prospective study to determine the benefit of Hoffmann's sign.","authors":"Eric H Gruenberger, Sohrab K Vatsia, Rourke M Stay, Cameron Kersey, Mudassar A Khan, Douglas W Pahl","doi":"10.52965/001c.77875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of age-related spinal cord dysfunction worldwide. Despite the widespread use of provocative physical exam maneuvers in the workup of DCM, the clinical significance of Hoffmann's sign is controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of Hoffmann's sign for DCM in a cohort of patients treated by a single spine surgeon.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of a Hoffmann sign on physical examination. Advanced imaging studies were independently reviewed by four raters for confirmation of a diagnosis of cervical cord compression. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood, and relative risk ratios for the Hoffmann sign were calculated, with subsequent Chi-square and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to further characterize correlative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two patients were included - of whom, thirty-four (58.6%) patients presented with a Hoffmann sign, and eleven (21.1%) patients demonstrated cord compression on imaging. The Hoffmann sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 35.7% (LR = 0.32; 0.16-1.16). Chi-square analysis revealed that imaging findings positive for cord compression were proportionally greater for patients lacking a Hoffmann sign than those with a confirmed Hoffmann sign (<i>p</i> =0.032) ROC analysis demonstrated that a negative Hoffmann sign performed moderately well in predicting cord compression (AUC.721; <i>p</i> =0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Hoffmann sign is an unreliable marker for cervical cord compression, and the lack of a Hoffmann sign may be more predictive of cervical cord compression.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"15 ","pages":"77875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317513/pdf/orthopedicreviews_2023_15_77875.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.77875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of age-related spinal cord dysfunction worldwide. Despite the widespread use of provocative physical exam maneuvers in the workup of DCM, the clinical significance of Hoffmann's sign is controversial.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of Hoffmann's sign for DCM in a cohort of patients treated by a single spine surgeon.

Materials & methods: Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of a Hoffmann sign on physical examination. Advanced imaging studies were independently reviewed by four raters for confirmation of a diagnosis of cervical cord compression. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood, and relative risk ratios for the Hoffmann sign were calculated, with subsequent Chi-square and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to further characterize correlative findings.

Results: Fifty-two patients were included - of whom, thirty-four (58.6%) patients presented with a Hoffmann sign, and eleven (21.1%) patients demonstrated cord compression on imaging. The Hoffmann sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 35.7% (LR = 0.32; 0.16-1.16). Chi-square analysis revealed that imaging findings positive for cord compression were proportionally greater for patients lacking a Hoffmann sign than those with a confirmed Hoffmann sign (p =0.032) ROC analysis demonstrated that a negative Hoffmann sign performed moderately well in predicting cord compression (AUC.721; p =0.031).

Conclusions: The Hoffmann sign is an unreliable marker for cervical cord compression, and the lack of a Hoffmann sign may be more predictive of cervical cord compression.

霍夫曼视差:确定霍夫曼征的益处的前瞻性研究。
背景:退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)是全球最常见的老年性脊髓功能障碍的病因。尽管在 DCM 的检查中广泛使用了挑衅性体格检查手法,但霍夫曼征的临床意义仍存在争议:本研究旨在前瞻性地评估由一名脊柱外科医生治疗的一组患者中霍夫曼征对 DCM 的诊断效果:根据体格检查是否出现霍夫曼征将患者分为两组。先进的影像学检查由四位评定者独立审查,以确诊颈脊髓受压。计算霍夫曼征的患病率、敏感性、特异性、可能性和相对风险比,随后进行Chi-square和接收器操作特征(ROC)分析,以进一步确定相关结果的特征:共纳入 52 例患者,其中 34 例(58.6%)患者出现霍夫曼征,11 例(21.1%)患者在成像中显示脊髓受压。霍夫曼征的敏感性为 20%,特异性为 35.7%(LR = 0.32;0.16-1.16)。ROC分析表明,阴性霍夫曼征在预测脊髓压迫方面表现一般(AUC.721;P =0.031):结论:霍夫曼征是颈脊髓受压的不可靠标记,无霍夫曼征可能更能预测颈脊髓受压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信