[IEHT or inpatient treatment? - First results of the multicenter AKtiV study on inpatient-equivalent home treatment regarding the study population and index treatment].
Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Stefan Weinmann, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Peter Brieger, Jürgen Timm, Tamara Waldmann, Lasse Fischer, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Martin Holzke, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Johannes Hamann, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Andreas Bechdolf
{"title":"[IEHT or inpatient treatment? - First results of the multicenter AKtiV study on inpatient-equivalent home treatment regarding the study population and index treatment].","authors":"Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Stefan Weinmann, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Peter Brieger, Jürgen Timm, Tamara Waldmann, Lasse Fischer, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Martin Holzke, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Johannes Hamann, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Andreas Bechdolf","doi":"10.1055/a-2138-8920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The quasi-experimental AKtiV study investigates the effects inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT). This paper describes the study population based on demographic and clinical parameters at baseline and compares the index treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a period of 12 months 200 IEHT users were included in the intervention group (IG) and 200 inpatients were included in the control group (CG). The comparability of the two groups was ensured by propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In addition to the PSM variables, IG and CG did not differ significantly from each other variables at study inclusion. The duration of the index treatment was significantly longer in the IG (M=37.2 days) compared to the CG (M=27.9 days; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The similarity of the two groups enables comparisons over 12 months, investigating IEHT effects on long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":"407-414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2138-8920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The quasi-experimental AKtiV study investigates the effects inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT). This paper describes the study population based on demographic and clinical parameters at baseline and compares the index treatment.
Methods: Over a period of 12 months 200 IEHT users were included in the intervention group (IG) and 200 inpatients were included in the control group (CG). The comparability of the two groups was ensured by propensity score matching (PSM).
Results: In addition to the PSM variables, IG and CG did not differ significantly from each other variables at study inclusion. The duration of the index treatment was significantly longer in the IG (M=37.2 days) compared to the CG (M=27.9 days; p<0.001).
Conclusion: The similarity of the two groups enables comparisons over 12 months, investigating IEHT effects on long-term outcomes.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
