Potential role of thoracolumbar fascia in younger middle-aged patients with chronic low back pain.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
International Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1080/00207454.2023.2251671
S Gumruk Aslan, S Koylu Uyar, E Gurcay
{"title":"Potential role of thoracolumbar fascia in younger middle-aged patients with chronic low back pain.","authors":"S Gumruk Aslan, S Koylu Uyar, E Gurcay","doi":"10.1080/00207454.2023.2251671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to quantitatively assess the thickness of the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) and lumbar multifidus muscle through ultrasound imaging in younger-middle aged individuals, both those experiencing chronic low back pain (LBP) and those without LBP. Additionally, the study sought to explore the potential significance of these anatomical structures in relation to clinical and sonographic findings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted involving a cohort of 50 participants, divided into two groups: chronic LBP group (Group LBP, <i>n</i> = 30) and a group without LBP (Group control, <i>n</i> = 20). Participants from both groups underwent assessments pertaining to pain characteristics (intensity and quality), functional impairment, and kinesiophobia. The thicknesses of the thoracolumbar fascia and lumbar multifidus muscle were measured using ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants with chronic LBP, the thoracolumbar fascia displayed a statistically significant increase in thickness on the left side, whereas the lumbar multifidus muscle exhibited reduced thickness on the left side. Notably, positive correlations were observed between the thickness of the thoracolumbar fascia and scores from the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity (<i>r</i> = 0.472, <i>p</i> = 0.008) as well as the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) (<i>r</i> = 0.547, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Moreover, a positive correlation was established between the thickness of the lumbar multifidus muscle and the modified Schober test (<i>r</i> = 0.174, <i>p</i> = 0.040). However, the thickness of the lumbar multifidus muscle demonstrated a negative correlation with age (r = -0.304, <i>p</i> = 0.032). Multiple logistic regression analysis did not identify any significant predictors for the presence of LBP based on demographic or clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals afflicted with chronic LBP exhibited pronounced thickening of the thoracolumbar fascia and attenuation of the lumbar multifidus muscle in comparison to asymptomatic counterparts. Notably, increased thickness of the thoracolumbar fascia corresponded to heightened pain intensity, while reduction in lumbar multifidus muscle thickness was associated with decreased lumbar flexion ability. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating tailored regimens targeting both fascial and muscular components in the rehabilitation of individuals with LBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1198-1204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2023.2251671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to quantitatively assess the thickness of the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) and lumbar multifidus muscle through ultrasound imaging in younger-middle aged individuals, both those experiencing chronic low back pain (LBP) and those without LBP. Additionally, the study sought to explore the potential significance of these anatomical structures in relation to clinical and sonographic findings.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving a cohort of 50 participants, divided into two groups: chronic LBP group (Group LBP, n = 30) and a group without LBP (Group control, n = 20). Participants from both groups underwent assessments pertaining to pain characteristics (intensity and quality), functional impairment, and kinesiophobia. The thicknesses of the thoracolumbar fascia and lumbar multifidus muscle were measured using ultrasonography.

Results: Among participants with chronic LBP, the thoracolumbar fascia displayed a statistically significant increase in thickness on the left side, whereas the lumbar multifidus muscle exhibited reduced thickness on the left side. Notably, positive correlations were observed between the thickness of the thoracolumbar fascia and scores from the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity (r = 0.472, p = 0.008) as well as the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) (r = 0.547, p = 0.002). Moreover, a positive correlation was established between the thickness of the lumbar multifidus muscle and the modified Schober test (r = 0.174, p = 0.040). However, the thickness of the lumbar multifidus muscle demonstrated a negative correlation with age (r = -0.304, p = 0.032). Multiple logistic regression analysis did not identify any significant predictors for the presence of LBP based on demographic or clinical variables.

Conclusions: Individuals afflicted with chronic LBP exhibited pronounced thickening of the thoracolumbar fascia and attenuation of the lumbar multifidus muscle in comparison to asymptomatic counterparts. Notably, increased thickness of the thoracolumbar fascia corresponded to heightened pain intensity, while reduction in lumbar multifidus muscle thickness was associated with decreased lumbar flexion ability. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating tailored regimens targeting both fascial and muscular components in the rehabilitation of individuals with LBP.

胸腰筋膜在中青年慢性腰痛患者中的潜在作用。
目的:本研究旨在通过超声成像定量评估中青年慢性腰痛(LBP)和无腰痛(LBP)患者胸腰筋膜(TLF)和腰椎多裂肌的厚度。此外,本研究试图探讨这些解剖结构与临床和超声检查结果的潜在意义。方法:采用横断面研究方法,将50名受试者分为慢性下腰痛组(LBP组,n = 30)和非下腰痛组(对照组,n = 20)。两组的参与者都接受了疼痛特征(强度和质量)、功能损伤和运动恐惧症的评估。超声测量胸腰筋膜和腰椎多裂肌厚度。结果:在慢性腰痛患者中,左侧胸腰筋膜厚度有统计学意义的增加,而左侧腰多裂肌厚度减少。值得注意的是,胸腰筋膜厚度与疼痛强度数值评定量表(NRS)评分(r = 0.472, p = 0.008)和McGill疼痛问卷(MPQ)评分(r = 0.547, p = 0.002)呈正相关。此外,腰椎多裂肌厚度与修正Schober检验呈正相关(r = 0.174, p = 0.040)。然而,腰椎多裂肌的厚度与年龄呈负相关(r = -0.304, p = 0.032)。多元逻辑回归分析没有发现任何基于人口统计学或临床变量的显著预测因素。结论:与无症状的个体相比,患有慢性腰痛的个体表现出明显的胸腰筋膜增厚和腰椎多裂肌衰减。值得注意的是,胸腰筋膜厚度的增加与疼痛强度的增加相对应,而腰椎多裂肌厚度的减少与腰椎屈曲能力的下降有关。这些发现强调了在腰痛患者康复中结合针对筋膜和肌肉成分的量身定制方案的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neuroscience publishes original research articles, reviews, brief scientific reports, case studies, letters to the editor and book reviews concerned with problems of the nervous system and related clinical studies, epidemiology, neuropathology, medical and surgical treatment options and outcomes, neuropsychology and other topics related to the research and care of persons with neurologic disorders.  The focus of the journal is clinical and transitional research. Topics covered include but are not limited to: ALS, ataxia, autism, brain tumors, child neurology, demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, genetics, headache, lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, myopathy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, neuropharmacology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, pain, sleep disorders, stroke, and other areas related to the neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信