Strategy-based motor learning decreases the post-movement β power

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Betina Korka , Matthias Will , Izel Avci , Fabio Dukagjini , Max-Philipp Stenner
{"title":"Strategy-based motor learning decreases the post-movement β power","authors":"Betina Korka ,&nbsp;Matthias Will ,&nbsp;Izel Avci ,&nbsp;Fabio Dukagjini ,&nbsp;Max-Philipp Stenner","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Motor learning depends on the joint contribution of several processes including cognitive strategies aiming at goal achievement and prediction error-driven implicit adaptation. Understanding this functional interplay and its clinical implications requires insight into the individual learning processes, including at a neural level. Here, we set out to examine the impact of learning a cognitive strategy, over and above implicit adaptation, on the oscillatory post-movement β rebound (PMBR), which typically decreases in power following (visuo)motor perturbations. Healthy participants performed reaching movements towards a target, with online visual feedback replacing the view of their moving hand. The feedback was sometimes rotated, either relative to their movements (visuomotor rotation) or invariant to their movements (and relative to the target; clamped feedback), always for two consecutive trials interspersed between non-rotated trials. In both conditions, the first trial with a rotation was unpredictable. On the second trial, the task was either to re-aim, and thereby compensate for the rotation experienced in the first trial (visuomotor rotation; <em>Compensate</em> condition), or to ignore the rotation and keep on aiming at the target (clamped feedback; <em>Ignore</em> condition). After-effects did not differ between conditions, indicating that the amount of implicit learning was similar, while large differences in movement direction in the second rotated trial between conditions indicated that participants successfully acquired re-aiming strategies. Importantly, PMBR power following the first rotated trial was modulated differently in the two conditions. Specifically, it decreased in both conditions, but this effect was larger when participants had to acquire a cognitive strategy and prepare to re-aim. Our results therefore suggest that the PMBR is modulated by cognitive demands of motor learning, possibly reflecting the evaluation of a behaviourally significant goal achievement error.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"166 ","pages":"Pages 43-58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945223001090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motor learning depends on the joint contribution of several processes including cognitive strategies aiming at goal achievement and prediction error-driven implicit adaptation. Understanding this functional interplay and its clinical implications requires insight into the individual learning processes, including at a neural level. Here, we set out to examine the impact of learning a cognitive strategy, over and above implicit adaptation, on the oscillatory post-movement β rebound (PMBR), which typically decreases in power following (visuo)motor perturbations. Healthy participants performed reaching movements towards a target, with online visual feedback replacing the view of their moving hand. The feedback was sometimes rotated, either relative to their movements (visuomotor rotation) or invariant to their movements (and relative to the target; clamped feedback), always for two consecutive trials interspersed between non-rotated trials. In both conditions, the first trial with a rotation was unpredictable. On the second trial, the task was either to re-aim, and thereby compensate for the rotation experienced in the first trial (visuomotor rotation; Compensate condition), or to ignore the rotation and keep on aiming at the target (clamped feedback; Ignore condition). After-effects did not differ between conditions, indicating that the amount of implicit learning was similar, while large differences in movement direction in the second rotated trial between conditions indicated that participants successfully acquired re-aiming strategies. Importantly, PMBR power following the first rotated trial was modulated differently in the two conditions. Specifically, it decreased in both conditions, but this effect was larger when participants had to acquire a cognitive strategy and prepare to re-aim. Our results therefore suggest that the PMBR is modulated by cognitive demands of motor learning, possibly reflecting the evaluation of a behaviourally significant goal achievement error.

基于策略的运动学习降低了运动后β功率
运动学习依赖于几个过程的共同贡献,包括旨在实现目标的认知策略和预测错误驱动的内隐适应。了解这种功能相互作用及其临床意义需要深入了解个体的学习过程,包括在神经层面。在这里,我们开始研究学习一种认知策略,除了内隐适应之外,对振荡运动后β反弹(PMBR)的影响,后者通常在运动扰动(visuo)后功率下降。健康的参与者向目标进行伸手动作,在线视觉反馈取代了他们移动的手的视图。反馈有时是旋转的,要么是相对于它们的运动(视觉马达旋转),要么是与它们的运动无关(以及相对于目标;钳制反馈),总是在非旋转试验之间穿插的两个连续试验中进行。在这两种情况下,第一次轮换试验都是不可预测的。在第二次试验中,任务是重新瞄准,从而补偿第一次试验中经历的旋转(视觉马达旋转;补偿条件),或者忽略旋转并继续瞄准目标(箝位反馈;忽略条件)。不同条件下的后效应没有差异,这表明内隐学习的量是相似的,而在不同条件下第二次轮换试验中,运动方向的巨大差异表明参与者成功地获得了重新瞄准策略。重要的是,第一次旋转试验后的PMBR功率在两种条件下被不同地调节。具体来说,在这两种情况下,它都会减少,但当参与者必须获得认知策略并准备重新瞄准时,这种影响更大。因此,我们的研究结果表明,PMBR受到运动学习的认知需求的调节,可能反映了对行为上显著的目标实现错误的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信