Effects of Pre-Hospital Dexamethasone Administration on Outcomes of Patients with COPD and Asthma Exacerbation; a Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.9 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Thongpitak Huabbangyang, Agasak Silakoon, Chunlanee Sangketchon, Jareeda Sukhuntee, Jukkit Kumkong, Tanut Srithanayuchet, Parinya Chamnanpol, Theeraphat Meechai
{"title":"Effects of Pre-Hospital Dexamethasone Administration on Outcomes of Patients with COPD and Asthma Exacerbation; a Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Thongpitak Huabbangyang,&nbsp;Agasak Silakoon,&nbsp;Chunlanee Sangketchon,&nbsp;Jareeda Sukhuntee,&nbsp;Jukkit Kumkong,&nbsp;Tanut Srithanayuchet,&nbsp;Parinya Chamnanpol,&nbsp;Theeraphat Meechai","doi":"10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma exacerbation are two common emergency situations. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pre-hospital dexamethasone initiation on treatment outcomes of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cross-sectional and comparative study, data from the emergency medical service (EMS) care report of patients with a final diagnosis of asthma or COPD, coded with Thailand's emergency medical triage protocol, collected between January 1, 2021, and October 31, 2022, were used. Data on baseline characteristics, emergency department length of stay (ED-LOS), and hospital admission rates were collected from electronic medical records and compared between cases with and without pre-hospital dexamethasone administration by EMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>200 patients with COPD (n = 93) and asthma (n = 107) exacerbation were enrolled. The dexamethasone-treated group had a lower but statistically non-significant hospital admission rate (71.0% versus 81.0%, absolute difference: -10%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -21.76, 1.76; p = 0.100). In patients with asthma, the dexamethasone-treated had lower median ED-LOS time (235 (IQR: 165.5-349.5) versus 322 (IQR: 238-404) minutes; p = 0.003). Dexamethasone-treated asthma patients had lower but statistically non-significant hospital admission rates (60.4% versus 78.0%, absolute difference: -17.55%, 95% CI: -34.96, -0.14; p = 0.510). In COPD patients the dexamethasone-treated and untreated groups had non-significantly lower hospital admission rates (80.8% versus 85.40%, absolute difference: -4.60%, 95% CI: -19.82, 10.63; p = 0.561) and non-significantly lower ED-LOS (232 (IQR: 150 - 346) versus 296 (IQR: 212 - 330) minutes, absolute difference: -59 (-130.81, 12.81); p = 0.106).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dexamethasone administration by EMS in pre-hospital setting for management of asthma and COPD patients is beneficial in reducing the ED-LOS and need for hospital admission but its effects are not statistically significant, except regarding the ED-LOS of asthma exacerbation cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"e56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6d/49/aaem-11-e56.PMC10475744.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma exacerbation are two common emergency situations. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pre-hospital dexamethasone initiation on treatment outcomes of these patients.

Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional and comparative study, data from the emergency medical service (EMS) care report of patients with a final diagnosis of asthma or COPD, coded with Thailand's emergency medical triage protocol, collected between January 1, 2021, and October 31, 2022, were used. Data on baseline characteristics, emergency department length of stay (ED-LOS), and hospital admission rates were collected from electronic medical records and compared between cases with and without pre-hospital dexamethasone administration by EMS.

Results: 200 patients with COPD (n = 93) and asthma (n = 107) exacerbation were enrolled. The dexamethasone-treated group had a lower but statistically non-significant hospital admission rate (71.0% versus 81.0%, absolute difference: -10%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -21.76, 1.76; p = 0.100). In patients with asthma, the dexamethasone-treated had lower median ED-LOS time (235 (IQR: 165.5-349.5) versus 322 (IQR: 238-404) minutes; p = 0.003). Dexamethasone-treated asthma patients had lower but statistically non-significant hospital admission rates (60.4% versus 78.0%, absolute difference: -17.55%, 95% CI: -34.96, -0.14; p = 0.510). In COPD patients the dexamethasone-treated and untreated groups had non-significantly lower hospital admission rates (80.8% versus 85.40%, absolute difference: -4.60%, 95% CI: -19.82, 10.63; p = 0.561) and non-significantly lower ED-LOS (232 (IQR: 150 - 346) versus 296 (IQR: 212 - 330) minutes, absolute difference: -59 (-130.81, 12.81); p = 0.106).

Conclusion: The dexamethasone administration by EMS in pre-hospital setting for management of asthma and COPD patients is beneficial in reducing the ED-LOS and need for hospital admission but its effects are not statistically significant, except regarding the ED-LOS of asthma exacerbation cases.

院前给药地塞米松对COPD合并哮喘加重患者预后的影响横断面研究
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘加重是两种常见的紧急情况。本研究旨在探讨院前地塞米松启动对这些患者治疗结果的影响。方法:在这项回顾性横断面比较研究中,使用了2021年1月1日至2022年10月31日期间收集的急诊医疗服务(EMS)护理报告数据,这些数据由泰国紧急医疗分诊方案编码,最终诊断为哮喘或COPD。从电子病历中收集基线特征、急诊科住院时间(ED-LOS)和住院率的数据,并比较EMS给予和未给予院前地塞米松的病例。结果:纳入200例COPD加重患者(n = 93)和哮喘加重患者(n = 107)。地塞米松治疗组住院率较低,但无统计学意义(71.0% vs 81.0%,绝对差异为-10%,95%可信区间(CI): -21.76, 1.76;P = 0.100)。在哮喘患者中,地塞米松治疗组ED-LOS时间中位数较低(235 (IQR: 165.5-349.5) vs 322 (IQR: 238-404)分钟;P = 0.003)。地塞米松治疗的哮喘患者住院率较低,但无统计学意义(60.4% vs 78.0%,绝对差异:-17.55%,95% CI: -34.96, -0.14;P = 0.510)。在慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,地塞米松治疗组和未治疗组的住院率无显著降低(80.8%对85.40%,绝对差异:-4.60%,95% CI: -19.82, 10.63;p = 0.561), ED-LOS无显著降低(232 (IQR: 150 - 346) vs 296 (IQR: 212 - 330)分钟,绝对差异:-59 (-130.81,12.81);P = 0.106)。结论:院前EMS给药地塞米松治疗哮喘和COPD患者有利于降低ED-LOS和住院次数,但除哮喘加重患者ED-LOS外,其他效果均无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信