A comprehensive intervention to enhance inpatient colon preparation quality for colonoscopy.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Andrew J Gawron, Brian Horner, Rudi Zurbuchen, Kathleen Boynton, John Fang
{"title":"A comprehensive intervention to enhance inpatient colon preparation quality for colonoscopy.","authors":"Andrew J Gawron,&nbsp;Brian Horner,&nbsp;Rudi Zurbuchen,&nbsp;Kathleen Boynton,&nbsp;John Fang","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5985.21.02766-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate colon preparation is a critical component of high-quality colonoscopy especially for inpatients undergoing colonoscopy for acute indications. Inpatient colonoscopy has a high incidence of inadequate preparations. We report implementation of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention to improve inpatient colonoscopy preparations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bowel preparation quality from inpatient colonoscopies performed for the 12 months prior to the comprehensive intervention were compared to colonoscopies performed for 12 months following the intervention. The intervention had multiple components including: 1) EMR-based colonoscopy preparation order set; 2) automated EMR alerts prompting nursing assessment of preparation progress; 3) standardized nursing charting processes for tracking preparation progress; and 4) standardized education for nursing staff and ordering providers on adequate colon preparation, assessment of colon preparation quality, and use of the above processes; and print and video patient education materials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-eight inpatient colonoscopies were performed in the preintervention assessment period and 163 colonoscopies in the postintervention period. Median preintervention Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) was 6 and 26% of patients had inadequate colon preparation. Median postintervention BBPS was 8 with 16% inadequate colon preparation (P=0.016). The postintervention group had less ASA class I patients and used a lower dose of fentanyl than the preintervention group. There were no other significant differences between the pre- and postintervention groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a comprehensive colon preparation quality intervention resulted in significantly improved inpatient colon preparation quality and decreased frequency of inadequate preparations. The intervention consisting of an EMR-based order-set, nursing alerts and charting process, and patient education materials is continually being refined.</p>","PeriodicalId":18653,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterology","volume":"69 3","pages":"351-358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.21.02766-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adequate colon preparation is a critical component of high-quality colonoscopy especially for inpatients undergoing colonoscopy for acute indications. Inpatient colonoscopy has a high incidence of inadequate preparations. We report implementation of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention to improve inpatient colonoscopy preparations.

Methods: Bowel preparation quality from inpatient colonoscopies performed for the 12 months prior to the comprehensive intervention were compared to colonoscopies performed for 12 months following the intervention. The intervention had multiple components including: 1) EMR-based colonoscopy preparation order set; 2) automated EMR alerts prompting nursing assessment of preparation progress; 3) standardized nursing charting processes for tracking preparation progress; and 4) standardized education for nursing staff and ordering providers on adequate colon preparation, assessment of colon preparation quality, and use of the above processes; and print and video patient education materials.

Results: Two hundred thirty-eight inpatient colonoscopies were performed in the preintervention assessment period and 163 colonoscopies in the postintervention period. Median preintervention Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) was 6 and 26% of patients had inadequate colon preparation. Median postintervention BBPS was 8 with 16% inadequate colon preparation (P=0.016). The postintervention group had less ASA class I patients and used a lower dose of fentanyl than the preintervention group. There were no other significant differences between the pre- and postintervention groups.

Conclusions: Implementation of a comprehensive colon preparation quality intervention resulted in significantly improved inpatient colon preparation quality and decreased frequency of inadequate preparations. The intervention consisting of an EMR-based order-set, nursing alerts and charting process, and patient education materials is continually being refined.

综合干预提高住院患者结肠镜检查结肠准备质量。
背景:充分的结肠准备是高质量结肠镜检查的关键组成部分,特别是对急性适应症的住院患者进行结肠镜检查。住院结肠镜检查有很高的发生率准备不足。我们报告实施了多方面的质量改善干预措施,以改善住院患者结肠镜检查的准备工作。方法:将综合干预前12个月的住院患者结肠镜检查的肠道准备质量与干预后12个月的结肠镜检查进行比较。干预包括多个组成部分:1)基于emr的结肠镜检查准备顺序设置;2)自动EMR警报,提示护理评估准备进度;3)标准化护理图表流程,跟踪制剂进度;4)对护理人员和订餐提供者进行结肠准备、结肠准备质量评估及上述流程使用的规范化教育;打印和录制患者教育材料。结果:干预前评估期住院患者结肠镜检查238例,干预后评估期住院患者结肠镜检查163例。干预前波士顿肠道准备评分(BBPS)中位数为6分,26%的患者结肠准备不足。干预后BBPS中位数为8,16%结肠准备不足(P=0.016)。干预后组ASA I级患者较少,使用的芬太尼剂量低于干预前组。干预前后两组之间没有其他显著差异。结论:全面结肠准备质量干预的实施显著提高了住院患者结肠准备质量,减少了准备不足的频率。干预措施包括基于电子病历的订单集,护理警报和图表处理,以及患者教育材料正在不断完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva gastroenterology
Minerva gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信