Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Closed Abdominal Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in wound care Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1089/wound.2023.0052
Maharjan Manik, Amaranathan Anandhi, Sathasivam Sureshkumar, Andi Rajendharan Keerthi, Mahalingam Sudharshan, Vikram Kate
{"title":"Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Closed Abdominal Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Maharjan Manik, Amaranathan Anandhi, Sathasivam Sureshkumar, Andi Rajendharan Keerthi, Mahalingam Sudharshan, Vikram Kate","doi":"10.1089/wound.2023.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (PNPWT) in reducing the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and other wound complications in closed abdominal incisions. <b>Approach:</b> This was a prospective, single-center, open-label parallel arm superiority randomized controlled trial conducted over 2 years. Participants were randomly assigned to PNPWT and standard surgical dressing (SSD) group. The occurrence of postoperative SSI within 30 days, other wound-related complications, length of hospital (LOH) stay, and readmission within 1 month among both the study group were studied. <b>Results:</b> A total of 140 participants were included, with 70 each randomized to the PNPWT and SSD groups. In this study, 28.5% and 5.8% developed SSI in the SSD and PNPWT groups, respectively (relative risk = 0.26; 95% confidence interval = 0.08-0.80; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Similarly, the incidence of seroma (7.2% vs. 18.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.016), wound dehiscence (0% vs. 4.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.244), superficial and deep SSI (5.7% vs. 24.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and (0% vs. 4.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.244), and LOH stay (days) (9 vs. 10.5, <i>p</i> = 0.07) were less in PNPWT compared to SSD group. <b>Innovation:</b> Despite the advances in surgical care, SSI rates continue to be high. The present findings might facilitate the use of PNPWT as a novel preventive strategy to reduce SSI in closed abdominal incision. <b>Conclusion:</b> The PNPWT in closed incisions following elective laparotomy can reduce the incidence of SSI when compared to SSD. The use of PNPWT was associated with a lower incidence of superficial SSI and seroma but without significant reduction in hospital stay. <b>Clinical Trial Registry India:</b> CTRI/2020/11/028795.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"123-130"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (PNPWT) in reducing the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and other wound complications in closed abdominal incisions. Approach: This was a prospective, single-center, open-label parallel arm superiority randomized controlled trial conducted over 2 years. Participants were randomly assigned to PNPWT and standard surgical dressing (SSD) group. The occurrence of postoperative SSI within 30 days, other wound-related complications, length of hospital (LOH) stay, and readmission within 1 month among both the study group were studied. Results: A total of 140 participants were included, with 70 each randomized to the PNPWT and SSD groups. In this study, 28.5% and 5.8% developed SSI in the SSD and PNPWT groups, respectively (relative risk = 0.26; 95% confidence interval = 0.08-0.80; p = 0.001). Similarly, the incidence of seroma (7.2% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.016), wound dehiscence (0% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.244), superficial and deep SSI (5.7% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.001) and (0% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.244), and LOH stay (days) (9 vs. 10.5, p = 0.07) were less in PNPWT compared to SSD group. Innovation: Despite the advances in surgical care, SSI rates continue to be high. The present findings might facilitate the use of PNPWT as a novel preventive strategy to reduce SSI in closed abdominal incision. Conclusion: The PNPWT in closed incisions following elective laparotomy can reduce the incidence of SSI when compared to SSD. The use of PNPWT was associated with a lower incidence of superficial SSI and seroma but without significant reduction in hospital stay. Clinical Trial Registry India: CTRI/2020/11/028795.

预防性负压伤口治疗减少腹部闭合切口手术部位感染:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在评估预防性负压伤口治疗(PNPWT)在降低闭合性腹部切口手术部位感染(SSI)和其他伤口并发症发生率方面的疗效。方法:这是一项为期2年的前瞻性、单中心、开放标签平行臂优势随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到PNPWT和标准外科敷料(SSD)组。研究了两个研究组术后30天内SSI的发生率、其他伤口相关并发症、住院时间(LOH)和1个月内再次入院的情况。结果:共有140名参与者被纳入,其中70人随机分为PNPWT组和SSD组。在本研究中,SSD组和PNPWT组分别有28.5%和5.8%的患者出现SSI(相对风险 = 0.26;95%置信区间 = 0.08-0.80;p = 0.001)。同样,血清瘤的发生率(7.2%vs.18.5%,p = 0.016),伤口裂开(0%对4.2%,p = 0.244),浅层和深层SSI(5.7%对24.3%,p = 0.001)和(0%对4.2%,p = 0.244)和LOH停留时间(天)(9对10.5,p = 0.07)与SSD组相比减少。创新:尽管外科护理取得了进步,SSI率仍然很高。目前的研究结果可能有助于使用PNPWT作为一种新的预防策略,以减少腹部闭合切口中的SSI。结论:与SSD相比,择期剖腹术后闭合切口PNPWT可降低SSI的发生率。PNPWT的使用与浅表SSI和血清瘤的发生率较低有关,但住院时间没有显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信