Managing cholesteatomas with labyrinthine fistula.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Singapore medical journal Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-22 DOI:10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-377
Natalie Min Yi Aw, Jiun Fong Thong, Barrie Yau Boon Tan, Vanessa Yee Jueen Tan
{"title":"Managing cholesteatomas with labyrinthine fistula.","authors":"Natalie Min Yi Aw, Jiun Fong Thong, Barrie Yau Boon Tan, Vanessa Yee Jueen Tan","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A retrospective study (2011 to 2018) was conducted to evaluate the management of cholesteatomas with labyrinthine fistulae (LFs), clinical characteristics and postoperative hearing outcomes in a hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic data of patients with primary middle ear mastoidectomies for cholesteatoma were extracted. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) temporal bone and intraoperative findings, and hearing levels preoperatively and postoperatively were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the middle ear cholesteatomas, 15.6% ( n = 14) of ears were complicated by LF. HRCT scans showed 92.9% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity in the identification of LFs. Intraoperative findings of LFs include stapes erosion (78.6%), malleus erosion (78.6%), incus erosion (92.9%), dehiscence of tegmen tympani (28.6%) and tympanic facial canal (64.3%). Compared to the non-LF group, the LF group showed significantly higher incidence of stapes erosion ( P < 0.001), tegmen tympani dehiscence ( P = 0.016) and semicircular canal dehiscence ( P < 0.001). Matrix was removed completely in 85.7% ( n = 12) and was left behind in 14.3% ( n = 2) of ears. Also, 21.5% ( n = 3) had preoperative dead ears. Postoperative hearing results had a mean follow-up time of 2.1 (standard deviation 1.5, range 0.14-4.84) years. In the matrix removal group ( n = 9), 77.9% had unchanged hearing levels, 11.1% showed improvement and 11.1% showed decrease in hearing levels. The matrix preservation group ( n = 2) had deteriorated hearing levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preservation of hearing in LFs is possible with cautious matrix removal. Despite matrix preservation to preserve hearing in large LFs, our patients' hearing deteriorated postoperatively. Longer follow-up of hearing with matrix preservation may show poorer hearing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21752,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":"601-605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12680296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A retrospective study (2011 to 2018) was conducted to evaluate the management of cholesteatomas with labyrinthine fistulae (LFs), clinical characteristics and postoperative hearing outcomes in a hospital.

Methods: Demographic data of patients with primary middle ear mastoidectomies for cholesteatoma were extracted. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) temporal bone and intraoperative findings, and hearing levels preoperatively and postoperatively were evaluated.

Results: Of the middle ear cholesteatomas, 15.6% ( n = 14) of ears were complicated by LF. HRCT scans showed 92.9% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity in the identification of LFs. Intraoperative findings of LFs include stapes erosion (78.6%), malleus erosion (78.6%), incus erosion (92.9%), dehiscence of tegmen tympani (28.6%) and tympanic facial canal (64.3%). Compared to the non-LF group, the LF group showed significantly higher incidence of stapes erosion ( P < 0.001), tegmen tympani dehiscence ( P = 0.016) and semicircular canal dehiscence ( P < 0.001). Matrix was removed completely in 85.7% ( n = 12) and was left behind in 14.3% ( n = 2) of ears. Also, 21.5% ( n = 3) had preoperative dead ears. Postoperative hearing results had a mean follow-up time of 2.1 (standard deviation 1.5, range 0.14-4.84) years. In the matrix removal group ( n = 9), 77.9% had unchanged hearing levels, 11.1% showed improvement and 11.1% showed decrease in hearing levels. The matrix preservation group ( n = 2) had deteriorated hearing levels.

Conclusion: Preservation of hearing in LFs is possible with cautious matrix removal. Despite matrix preservation to preserve hearing in large LFs, our patients' hearing deteriorated postoperatively. Longer follow-up of hearing with matrix preservation may show poorer hearing outcomes.

迷路瘘合并胆脂瘤的治疗。
前言:回顾性研究某医院胆脂瘤合并迷路瘘(LFs)的治疗、临床特点及术后听力结局。方法:收集中耳胆脂瘤原发乳突切除术患者的人口学资料。评估术前颞骨高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)和术中发现,以及术前和术后听力水平。结果:中耳胆脂瘤中,15.6% (n = 14)耳合并LF。HRCT扫描对LFs的识别灵敏度为92.9%,特异性为94.7%。术中表现为镫骨糜烂(78.6%)、锤骨糜烂(78.6%)、母牙糜烂(92.9%)、鼓膜被膜开裂(28.6%)、鼓膜面管开裂(64.3%)。与非LF组相比,LF组镫骨糜烂(P < 0.001)、鼓膜开裂(P = 0.016)和半规管开裂(P < 0.001)的发生率显著高于非LF组。85.7% (n = 12)耳基质完全去除,14.3% (n = 2)耳基质残留。21.5% (n = 3)患者术前有死耳。术后听力结果的平均随访时间为2.1年(标准差1.5,范围0.14-4.84)。在基质去除组(n = 9), 77.9%的人听力水平不变,11.1%的人听力水平改善,11.1%的人听力水平下降。基质保存组(n = 2)听力水平下降。结论:采用谨慎的基质去除术可以保留LFs患者的听力。尽管在大LFs中保留基质以保持听力,但我们的患者的听力在术后恶化。听力基质保存随访时间较长,听力效果较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Singapore medical journal
Singapore medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ) is the monthly publication of Singapore Medical Association (SMA). The Journal aims to advance medical practice and clinical research by publishing high-quality articles that add to the clinical knowledge of physicians in Singapore and worldwide. SMJ is a general medical journal that focuses on all aspects of human health. The Journal publishes commissioned reviews, commentaries and editorials, original research, a small number of outstanding case reports, continuing medical education articles (ECG Series, Clinics in Diagnostic Imaging, Pictorial Essays, Practice Integration & Life-long Learning [PILL] Series), and short communications in the form of letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书