Patient-controlled intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine with nalbuphine versus sufentanil for post cesarean delivery analgesia: A retrospective observational study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Wei-Wei Li, Bei Zheng, Rong Shi, Yue-Ming Jiang, Yan-Nan Liu, Zhi-Wei Wang
{"title":"Patient-controlled intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine with nalbuphine versus sufentanil for post cesarean delivery analgesia: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Wei-Wei Li,&nbsp;Bei Zheng,&nbsp;Rong Shi,&nbsp;Yue-Ming Jiang,&nbsp;Yan-Nan Liu,&nbsp;Zhi-Wei Wang","doi":"10.1002/kjm2.12689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective observational study aims to investigate the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) of dexmedetomidine (DEX) with nalbuphine (NAL) versus sufentanil (SUF) for post-cesarean delivery management. A total of 300 women were evaluated who underwent cesarean section surgery with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. After surgery, all patients were connected to a patient-controlled analgesia pump. The PCIA protocol was programmed with 0.11 μg/kg/h DEX in combination with 0.03 μg/kg/h SUF in Group I (n = 150) or 0.11 μg/kg/h DEX in combination with 0.03 mg/kg/h NAL in Group II (n = 150). There was no significant difference in incision pain and sedation level between the two groups within 48 h after the surgery assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation scale, respectively. However, at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, visceral pain at rest and at mobilization was alleviated in the Group II as compared with the Group I with lower VAS scores. Moreover, fewer adverse reactions were found in the Group II when compared with Group I, including postpartum respiratory depression, nausea/vomiting, urinary retention, and cardiovascular events. Overall, there was an increased patient satisfaction in the Group II as compared with the Group I. Based on the results of this study, it seems that adding NAL to PCIA with DEX, as compared to SUF with DEX, have an effect on reducing the intensity of visceral pain after cesarean section with less adverse reactions and higher patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":49946,"journal":{"name":"Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"39 7","pages":"740-747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12689","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective observational study aims to investigate the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) of dexmedetomidine (DEX) with nalbuphine (NAL) versus sufentanil (SUF) for post-cesarean delivery management. A total of 300 women were evaluated who underwent cesarean section surgery with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. After surgery, all patients were connected to a patient-controlled analgesia pump. The PCIA protocol was programmed with 0.11 μg/kg/h DEX in combination with 0.03 μg/kg/h SUF in Group I (n = 150) or 0.11 μg/kg/h DEX in combination with 0.03 mg/kg/h NAL in Group II (n = 150). There was no significant difference in incision pain and sedation level between the two groups within 48 h after the surgery assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation scale, respectively. However, at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, visceral pain at rest and at mobilization was alleviated in the Group II as compared with the Group I with lower VAS scores. Moreover, fewer adverse reactions were found in the Group II when compared with Group I, including postpartum respiratory depression, nausea/vomiting, urinary retention, and cardiovascular events. Overall, there was an increased patient satisfaction in the Group II as compared with the Group I. Based on the results of this study, it seems that adding NAL to PCIA with DEX, as compared to SUF with DEX, have an effect on reducing the intensity of visceral pain after cesarean section with less adverse reactions and higher patient satisfaction.

患者控制静脉给药右美托咪定与纳布啡对比舒芬太尼用于剖宫产后镇痛:一项回顾性观察研究。
本回顾性观察性研究旨在探讨右美托咪定(DEX)联合纳布啡(NAL)与舒芬太尼(SUF)在剖宫产后患者静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)的效果。共有300名妇女接受剖宫产手术与脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉进行评估。手术后,所有患者都连接到患者控制的镇痛泵。PCIA方案采用0.11 μg/kg/h DEX联合0.03 μg/kg/h SUF组(n = 150)或0.11 μg/kg/h DEX联合0.03 mg/kg/h NAL组(n = 150)。两组术后48 h内切口疼痛及镇静水平分别用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Ramsay镇静评分进行评分,差异均无统计学意义。然而,在术后2、6、12和24小时,与VAS评分较低的I组相比,II组静息和活动时内脏疼痛减轻。此外,与第一组相比,第二组的不良反应更少,包括产后呼吸抑制、恶心/呕吐、尿潴留和心血管事件。总体而言,与i组相比,II组的患者满意度有所提高。根据本研究的结果,与SUF与DEX相比,在PCIA与DEX的基础上添加NAL,似乎可以减轻剖宫产术后内脏疼痛的强度,不良反应更少,患者满意度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences (KJMS), is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan. The journal was launched in 1985 to promote clinical and scientific research in the medical sciences in Taiwan, and to disseminate this research to the international community. It is published monthly by Wiley. KJMS aims to publish original research and review papers in all fields of medicine and related disciplines that are of topical interest to the medical profession. Authors are welcome to submit Perspectives, reviews, original articles, short communications, Correspondence and letters to the editor for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信