Diversity, equity, and inclusion in genitourinary clinical trials leading to FDA novel drug approval: An assessment of the FDA center for drug evaluation and research drug trials snapshot

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Asia N. Matthew-Onabanjo , Gabrielle Nortey , Richard S. Matulewicz , Ramsankar Basak , Donna A. Culton , Kimberly N. Weaver , Kristalyn K. Gallagher , Hung-Jui Tan , Tracy L. Rose , Matthew Milowsky , Marc A. Bjurlin
{"title":"Diversity, equity, and inclusion in genitourinary clinical trials leading to FDA novel drug approval: An assessment of the FDA center for drug evaluation and research drug trials snapshot","authors":"Asia N. Matthew-Onabanjo ,&nbsp;Gabrielle Nortey ,&nbsp;Richard S. Matulewicz ,&nbsp;Ramsankar Basak ,&nbsp;Donna A. Culton ,&nbsp;Kimberly N. Weaver ,&nbsp;Kristalyn K. Gallagher ,&nbsp;Hung-Jui Tan ,&nbsp;Tracy L. Rose ,&nbsp;Matthew Milowsky ,&nbsp;Marc A. Bjurlin","doi":"10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.100958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>To determine the distribution of race and ethnicity among genitourinary oncology trial participants leading to FDA approval of novel molecular entities/biologics. Secondarily, we evaluated whether the proportion of Black participants in </span>clinical trials<span> increased over time. We quired the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Drug Trials Snapshot (DTS) between 2015 and 2020 for urologic oncology<span> clinical trials leading to FDA approval of novel drugs<span>. Enrollment data was stratified by race and ethnicity. Cochran-Armitage Trend tests were used to examine changes in Black patient participation over years. Nine clinical trials were identified that led to FDA approval of 5 novel molecular entities for prostate and 4 molecular entities for urothelial carcinoma<span><span> treatment. Trials for </span>prostate cancer included 5202 participants of which 69.8% were White, 4.0% Black, 11.0% Asian, 3.6% Hispanic, &lt;1% American Indian/Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 3% other. Trials in urothelial carcinoma had 704 participants of which 75.1% were male, 80.8% White, 2.3% Black, 2.4% Hispanic, &lt;1% American Indian/Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 5% other. Black participation rates over time did not change for urothelial (</span></span></span></span></span><em>P</em> = 0.59) or the combined cancer cohort <em>(P</em> = 0.29). Prostate cancer enrollment trends among Black participant declined over time (<em>P</em> = 0.03). Participants in genitourinary clinical trials leading to FDA approval of novel drugs are overwhelmingly white. Involving stakeholders who represent the needs and interests of underrepresented populations in the design and implementation of clinical trials of novel agents may be a strategy to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion among genitourinary clinical trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55193,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cancer","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 100958"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523926/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147027223000119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To determine the distribution of race and ethnicity among genitourinary oncology trial participants leading to FDA approval of novel molecular entities/biologics. Secondarily, we evaluated whether the proportion of Black participants in clinical trials increased over time. We quired the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Drug Trials Snapshot (DTS) between 2015 and 2020 for urologic oncology clinical trials leading to FDA approval of novel drugs. Enrollment data was stratified by race and ethnicity. Cochran-Armitage Trend tests were used to examine changes in Black patient participation over years. Nine clinical trials were identified that led to FDA approval of 5 novel molecular entities for prostate and 4 molecular entities for urothelial carcinoma treatment. Trials for prostate cancer included 5202 participants of which 69.8% were White, 4.0% Black, 11.0% Asian, 3.6% Hispanic, <1% American Indian/Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 3% other. Trials in urothelial carcinoma had 704 participants of which 75.1% were male, 80.8% White, 2.3% Black, 2.4% Hispanic, <1% American Indian/Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 5% other. Black participation rates over time did not change for urothelial (P = 0.59) or the combined cancer cohort (P = 0.29). Prostate cancer enrollment trends among Black participant declined over time (P = 0.03). Participants in genitourinary clinical trials leading to FDA approval of novel drugs are overwhelmingly white. Involving stakeholders who represent the needs and interests of underrepresented populations in the design and implementation of clinical trials of novel agents may be a strategy to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion among genitourinary clinical trials.

泌尿生殖系统临床试验的多样性、公平性和包容性导致美国食品药品监督管理局新药批准:美国食品药品管理局药物评估和研究中心药物试验快照评估。
确定泌尿生殖肿瘤试验参与者的种族和民族分布,从而获得美国食品药品监督管理局对新型分子实体/生物制品的批准。其次,我们评估了临床试验中黑人参与者的比例是否随着时间的推移而增加。2015年至2020年间,我们获得了美国食品药品监督管理局药物评估与研究中心的药物试验快照(DTS),用于泌尿肿瘤临床试验,从而获得美国食品药品管理局的新药批准。入学数据按种族和民族进行分层。Cochran-Armitage趋势测试用于检查多年来黑人患者参与度的变化。已确定9项临床试验,导致美国食品药品监督管理局批准了5种用于前列腺的新型分子实体和4种用于治疗尿路上皮癌的分子实体。前列腺癌症试验包括5202名参与者,其中69.8%为白人,4.0%为黑人,11.0%为亚洲人,3.6%为西班牙裔,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Problems in Cancer
Current Problems in Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Cancer seeks to promote and disseminate innovative, transformative, and impactful data on patient-oriented cancer research and clinical care. Specifically, the journal''s scope is focused on reporting the results of well-designed cancer studies that influence/alter practice or identify new directions in clinical cancer research. These studies can include novel therapeutic approaches, new strategies for early diagnosis, cancer clinical trials, and supportive care, among others. Papers that focus solely on laboratory-based or basic science research are discouraged. The journal''s format also allows, on occasion, for a multi-faceted overview of a single topic via a curated selection of review articles, while also offering articles that present dynamic material that influences the oncology field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信