EPA Consensus Project Paper: The Influence of Prosthetic Factors on the Incidence of Peri-implantitis Around Single Implants: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
G Papavasiliou, A Tsigarida, I Papathanasiou, E A Kotsailidi, A B Barmak
{"title":"EPA Consensus Project Paper: The Influence of Prosthetic Factors on the Incidence of Peri-implantitis Around Single Implants: A Systematic Review.","authors":"G Papavasiliou,&nbsp;A Tsigarida,&nbsp;I Papathanasiou,&nbsp;E A Kotsailidi,&nbsp;A B Barmak","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2533Papavasiliou10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate how prosthetic factors affect the incidence of peri-implantitis in patients treated with single implant restorations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic and manual search of two indexed databases up to April 2023 were conducted, to identify clinical studies reporting on the effect of different prosthetic factors on the incidence of peri-implantitis around single implants and with at least 1 year follow-up. The risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist, the ROB2 and the ROBINS-I tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 521 screened articles, 11 studies (1 randomized controlled trial, 7 cross-sectional, 3 retrospective) met the inclusion criteria. Based on three studies, emergence angle⟩30°, convex emergence profile and external connection are associated with a higher incidence of peri-implantitis. Nine studies pertaining to the effect of retention type on the prevalence of peri-implantitis reported conflicting results. Six out of eleven included studies presented some risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is insufficient evidence regarding the influence of prosthetic factors on the incidence of peri-implantitis around single implants. Further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2533Papavasiliou10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate how prosthetic factors affect the incidence of peri-implantitis in patients treated with single implant restorations.

Methods: Electronic and manual search of two indexed databases up to April 2023 were conducted, to identify clinical studies reporting on the effect of different prosthetic factors on the incidence of peri-implantitis around single implants and with at least 1 year follow-up. The risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist, the ROB2 and the ROBINS-I tools.

Results: From the 521 screened articles, 11 studies (1 randomized controlled trial, 7 cross-sectional, 3 retrospective) met the inclusion criteria. Based on three studies, emergence angle⟩30°, convex emergence profile and external connection are associated with a higher incidence of peri-implantitis. Nine studies pertaining to the effect of retention type on the prevalence of peri-implantitis reported conflicting results. Six out of eleven included studies presented some risk of bias.

Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence regarding the influence of prosthetic factors on the incidence of peri-implantitis around single implants. Further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on this issue.

EPA共识项目论文:假体因素对单个假体周围种植体炎发生率的影响:系统综述。
简介:本系统综述的目的是评估假体因素如何影响单种植体修复患者种植体周围炎的发生率。方法:对截至2023年4月的两个索引数据库进行电子和人工检索,找出不同假体因素对单个假体周围种植体炎发生率影响的临床研究报告,并进行至少1年的随访。使用Joanna Briggs研究所关键评估清单、ROB2和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。结果:在521篇筛选文章中,11项研究(1项随机对照试验,7项横断面试验,3项回顾性研究)符合纳入标准。根据三项研究,萌发角⟩30°,凸出轮廓和外部连接与较高的种植体周围炎发生率相关。关于保留类型对种植体周围炎患病率的影响的九项研究报告了相互矛盾的结果。11项纳入的研究中有6项存在一定的偏倚风险。结论:假体因素对单种植体周围种植体炎发生率的影响证据不足。需要进一步的研究才能对这个问题得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信