Evaluation of a behavioural intervention to reduce perioperative midazolam administration to older adults

Scott Seki , Molly Candon , Sushila Murthy , Gurmukh Sahota , Rachel R. Kelz , Mark D. Neuman
{"title":"Evaluation of a behavioural intervention to reduce perioperative midazolam administration to older adults","authors":"Scott Seki ,&nbsp;Molly Candon ,&nbsp;Sushila Murthy ,&nbsp;Gurmukh Sahota ,&nbsp;Rachel R. Kelz ,&nbsp;Mark D. Neuman","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Older patients commonly receive benzodiazepines during anaesthesia despite guidelines recommending avoidance. Interventions to reduce perioperative benzodiazepine use are not well studied. We hypothesized an automated electronic medical record alert targeting anaesthesia providers would reduce administration of benzodiazepines to older adults undergoing general anaesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study of adults who underwent surgery at 5 hospitals within one US academic health system. One of the hospitals received an intervention consisting of provider education and an automated electronic medical record alert discouraging benzodiazepine administration to patients aged 70 years or older. We used difference-in-differences analysis to compare patterns of midazolam use 12-months before and after intervention at the intervention hospital, using the 4 non-intervention hospitals as contemporaneous comparators.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The primary analysis sample included 20,347 cases among patients aged 70 and older. At the intervention hospital, midazolam was administered in 454/4,240 (10.7%) cases pre-alert versus 250/3,750 (6.7%) post-alert (p&lt;0.001). At comparator hospitals, respective rates were 3,186/6,366 (50.0%) versus 2,935/5,991 (49.0%) (p=0.24). After adjustment, the intervention was associated with a 3.2 percentage point (p.p.) reduction in the percentage of cases with midazolam administration (95% CI: (-5.2, -1.1); p=0.002). Midazolam dose was unaffected (adjusted mean difference -0.01 mg, 95% CI: (-0.20, 0.18); p=0.90). In 76,735 cases among patients aged 18–69, the percentage of cases with midazolam administration decreased by 6.9 p. p. (95% CI: (-8.0, -5.7); p&lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Provider-facing alerts in the intraoperative electronic medical record, coupled with education, can reduce midazolam administration to older patients presenting for surgery but may affect care of younger patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609623000850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Older patients commonly receive benzodiazepines during anaesthesia despite guidelines recommending avoidance. Interventions to reduce perioperative benzodiazepine use are not well studied. We hypothesized an automated electronic medical record alert targeting anaesthesia providers would reduce administration of benzodiazepines to older adults undergoing general anaesthesia.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of adults who underwent surgery at 5 hospitals within one US academic health system. One of the hospitals received an intervention consisting of provider education and an automated electronic medical record alert discouraging benzodiazepine administration to patients aged 70 years or older. We used difference-in-differences analysis to compare patterns of midazolam use 12-months before and after intervention at the intervention hospital, using the 4 non-intervention hospitals as contemporaneous comparators.

Results

The primary analysis sample included 20,347 cases among patients aged 70 and older. At the intervention hospital, midazolam was administered in 454/4,240 (10.7%) cases pre-alert versus 250/3,750 (6.7%) post-alert (p<0.001). At comparator hospitals, respective rates were 3,186/6,366 (50.0%) versus 2,935/5,991 (49.0%) (p=0.24). After adjustment, the intervention was associated with a 3.2 percentage point (p.p.) reduction in the percentage of cases with midazolam administration (95% CI: (-5.2, -1.1); p=0.002). Midazolam dose was unaffected (adjusted mean difference -0.01 mg, 95% CI: (-0.20, 0.18); p=0.90). In 76,735 cases among patients aged 18–69, the percentage of cases with midazolam administration decreased by 6.9 p. p. (95% CI: (-8.0, -5.7); p<0.001).

Conclusion

Provider-facing alerts in the intraoperative electronic medical record, coupled with education, can reduce midazolam administration to older patients presenting for surgery but may affect care of younger patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

减少老年人围手术期咪达唑仑给药的行为干预评估
背景老年患者通常在麻醉期间服用苯二氮卓类药物,尽管指南建议避免使用。减少围手术期苯二氮卓类药物使用的干预措施没有得到很好的研究。我们假设,针对麻醉提供者的自动电子病历警报将减少接受全身麻醉的老年人服用苯二氮卓类药物的次数。方法我们对在美国一个学术卫生系统内的5家医院接受手术的成年人进行了回顾性研究。其中一家医院接受了由提供者教育和自动电子病历警报组成的干预,阻止70岁或以上的患者服用苯二氮卓类药物。我们使用差异中的差异分析来比较干预医院干预前后12个月咪达唑仑的使用模式,使用4家非干预医院作为同期对照。结果主要分析样本包括20347例70岁及以上患者。在干预医院,454/4240例(10.7%)病例在警报前服用咪唑安定,250/3750例(6.7%)在警报后服用咪唑安定(p<0.001)。在对照医院,分别为3186/6366例(50.0%)和2935/5991例(49.0%)(p=0.24)。调整后,干预与咪达唑仑给药的病例百分比降低3.2个百分点(p.p.)相关(95%CI:(-5.2,-1.1);p=0.002)。咪唑安定剂量不受影响(调整后的平均差异-0.01 mg,95%置信区间:(-0.20,0.18);p=0.90)。在年龄为18-69岁的76735例患者中,咪达唑仑给药的病例百分比下降了6.9 p.p.(95%置信区间:(-8.0,-5.7);p<;0.001)。结论术中电子病历中面对提供者的警报,再加上教育,可以减少对接受手术的老年患者的咪达唑仑给药,但可能影响对年轻患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信