Using the "Patient Generated Index" in Spine Surgery in an Appalachian Population.

Patricia Dekeseredy, Robert Marsh, Cara L Sedney
{"title":"Using the \"Patient Generated Index\" in Spine Surgery in an Appalachian Population.","authors":"Patricia Dekeseredy,&nbsp;Robert Marsh,&nbsp;Cara L Sedney","doi":"10.21885/wvmj.2019.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In most health care fields, outcomes are becoming increasingly scrutinized and may play a role in \"pay for performance;\" therefore, selecting the most appropriate outcomes measures for the populations being studied or treated has evolved into a key aspect of outcomes monitoring. One way to assess patient goals is to administer a \"patient generated index\" (PGI). The philosophical underpinning of the PGI is that the person living the life is the best judge of the quality of that life. The PGI has been utilized in low back pain, as well as in adult spinal deformity surgery, however, it has not been previously utilized in an Appalachian population. The PGI was administered by means of self-report to 80 new patients with back pain who presented for assessment in the neurosurgery clinic. Participants completed an acceptability survey and written comments as well as compliance were analyzed. Findings indicate that the PGI in its earliest form did not meet acceptable levels for use in this Appalachian subspecialist clinic setting. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on patient reported outcomes and more specifically, the importance of utilizing patient generated responses to map improvements in quality of life for patients over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":23032,"journal":{"name":"The West Virginia medical journal","volume":"115 3","pages":"21-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457017/pdf/nihms-1872762.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The West Virginia medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21885/wvmj.2019.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In most health care fields, outcomes are becoming increasingly scrutinized and may play a role in "pay for performance;" therefore, selecting the most appropriate outcomes measures for the populations being studied or treated has evolved into a key aspect of outcomes monitoring. One way to assess patient goals is to administer a "patient generated index" (PGI). The philosophical underpinning of the PGI is that the person living the life is the best judge of the quality of that life. The PGI has been utilized in low back pain, as well as in adult spinal deformity surgery, however, it has not been previously utilized in an Appalachian population. The PGI was administered by means of self-report to 80 new patients with back pain who presented for assessment in the neurosurgery clinic. Participants completed an acceptability survey and written comments as well as compliance were analyzed. Findings indicate that the PGI in its earliest form did not meet acceptable levels for use in this Appalachian subspecialist clinic setting. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on patient reported outcomes and more specifically, the importance of utilizing patient generated responses to map improvements in quality of life for patients over time.

Abstract Image

在阿巴拉契亚人口脊柱外科中使用“患者生成索引”。
在大多数卫生保健领域,对结果的审查越来越严格,并可能在"按绩效付费"中发挥作用;因此,为所研究或治疗的人群选择最适当的结果措施已演变为结果监测的一个关键方面。评估患者目标的一种方法是实施“患者生成指数”(PGI)。PGI的哲学基础是,生活的人是生活质量的最佳评判者。PGI已被用于治疗下腰痛和成人脊柱畸形手术,然而,它尚未在阿巴拉契亚人群中使用。采用自我报告的方式对80名在神经外科诊所接受评估的新背痛患者进行PGI测试。参与者完成了可接受性调查,并对书面评论和遵从性进行了分析。研究结果表明,早期形式的PGI不符合在阿巴拉契亚亚专科诊所使用的可接受水平。这项研究有助于增加患者报告结果的知识体系,更具体地说,利用患者产生的反应来绘制患者生活质量随时间的改善的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信